Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GIZZATOVA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (47)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87

  RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.01.2005 - 5124/03

  In this connection the Court recalls that the adequacy of the compensation would be diminished if it were to be paid without reference to various circumstances liable to reduce its value, such as an extended delay in enforcement (see Metaxas v. Greece, no. 8415/02, § 36, 27 May 2004; Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B, § 82).

• EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 32786/03

  SILCHENKO v. RUSSIA

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 19 et seq., ECHR 2002-III; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Gerasimova v. Russia, no. 24669/02, § 17 et seq., 13 October 2005).

  It recalls that the adequacy of the compensation would be diminished if it were to be paid without reference to various circumstances liable to reduce its value, such as an extended delay in enforcement (see Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 28, 13 January 2005; Metaxas v. Greece, no. 8415/02, § 36, 27 May 2004).

• EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 38720/03

  ALEKSANDR POPOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 19 et seq., ECHR 2002-III; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Gerasimova v. Russia, no. 24669/02, § 17 et seq., 13 October 2005).

  It recalls that the adequacy of the compensation would be diminished if it were to be paid without reference to various circumstances liable to reduce its value, such as an extended delay in enforcement (see Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 28, 13 January 2005; Metaxas v. Greece, no. 8415/02, § 36, 27 May 2004).

• EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 38719/03

  GLUSHAKOVA v. RUSSIA

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 19 et seq., ECHR 2002-III; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Gerasimova v. Russia, no. 24669/02, § 17 et seq., 13 October 2005).

  It recalls that the adequacy of the compensation would be diminished if it were to be paid without reference to various circumstances liable to reduce its value, such as an extended delay in enforcement (see Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 28, 13 January 2005; Metaxas v. Greece, no. 8415/02, § 36, 27 May 2004).

 
• EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 6558/06

  SAIDOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see Malinovskiy v. Russia, no. 41302/02, § 35 et seq., ECHR 2005; Teteriny v. Russia, no. 11931/03, § 41 et seq., 9 June 2005; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Burdov, cited above, § 34 et seq., ECHR 2002-III).

  The Court reiterates that the adequacy of the compensation would be diminished if it were to be paid without reference to various circumstances liable to reduce its value, such as an extended delay in enforcement (see Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 28, 13 January 2005; Metaxas v. Greece, no. 8415/02, § 36, 27 May 2004).

• EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 23287/05

  GLUSHAKOVA v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  Having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 19 et seq., ECHR 2002-III; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Gerasimova v. Russia, no. 24669/02, § 17 et seq., 13 October 2005), the Court finds that by failing for several years to comply with the enforceable judgment in the applicant's favour the domestic authorities impaired the essence of her right to a court and prevented her from receiving the money she could reasonably have expected to receive.

  The Court further reiterates that the adequacy of the compensation would be diminished if it were to be paid without reference to various circumstances liable to reduce its value, such as an extended delay in enforcement (see Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 28, 13 January 2005; Metaxas v. Greece, no. 8415/02, § 36, 27 May 2004).

• EGMR, 22.02.2007 - 5225/06

  VYALYKH v. RUSSIA

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 19 et seq., ECHR 2002-III; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Gerasimova v. Russia, no. 24669/02, § 17 et seq., 13 October 2005).

  It recalls that the adequacy of the compensation would be diminished if it were to be paid without reference to various circumstances liable to reduce the value of the award, such as an extended delay in enforcement (see Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 28, 13 January 2005; Metaxas v. Greece, no. 8415/02, § 36, 27 May 2004).

• EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 9800/02

  LAZAREV v. RUSSIA

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 19 et seq., ECHR 2002-III; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Gerasimova v. Russia, no. 24669/02, § 17 et seq., 13 October 2005).

  It recalls that the adequacy of the compensation would be diminished if it were to be paid without reference to various circumstances liable to reduce its value, such as an extended delay in enforcement (see Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 28, 13 January 2005; Metaxas v. Greece, no. 8415/02, § 36, 27 May 2004).

• EGMR, 16.12.2010 - 4532/04

  ROMOKHOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see Akashev, cited above, § 21 et seq.; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Petrushko v. Russia, no. 36494/02, § 23 et seq., 24 February 2005, and Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 34 et seq., ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 10.04.2008 - 21071/05

  WASSERMAN v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  La Cour a souvent conclu à la violation de l'article 6 § 1 de la Convention et de l'article 1 du Protocole no 1 dans des affaires qui soulevaient des questions similaires à celles posées en l'espèce (Reynbakh c. Russie, no 23405/03, §§ 23 et suivants, 29 septembre 2005, Gizzatova c. Russie, no 5124/03, §§ 19 et suivants, 13 janvier 2005, Petrushko c. Russie, no 6494/02, §§ 23 et suivants, 24 février 2005, Gorokhov et Roussyaïev c. Russie, no 38305/02, §§ 30 et suivants, 17 mars 2005, et Bourdov c. Russie, no 59498/00, §§ 34 et suivants, CEDH 2002-III).
• EGMR, 25.03.2008 - 11549/02

  FALIMONOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see Reynbakh v. Russia, no. 23405/03, § 23 et seq., 29 September 2005; Gizzatova v. Russia, no. 5124/03, § 19 et seq., 13 January 2005; Petrushko v. Russia, no. 36494/02, § 23 et seq., 24 February 2005; Gorokhov and Rusyayev v. Russia, no. 38305/02, § 30 et seq., 17 March 2005; Wasserman v. Russia, no. 15021/02, § 35 et seq., 18 November 2004; Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 34 et seq., ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 35016/03

  SALIYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 23405/03

  REYNBAKH v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 34336/10

  OOO TRUZHENIK-89 AND OOO FIRMA MOAZ v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.01.2008 - 75025/01

  ALEKSENTSEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 35259/04

  KUKSA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 39272/04

  KRAVTSOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 22.03.2011 - 36020/02

  BELAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.02.2011 - 6571/04

  IGOR VASILCHENKO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.04.2008 - 34150/04

  POGULYAYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.04.2008 - 12541/05

  IVAN NOVIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 3344/04

  MAYAMSIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.03.2008 - 13519/02

  GAYVORONSKIY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.03.2008 - 24229/03

  BRAGA, TIMOFEYEV AND KIRYUSHKINA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.03.2008 - 9769/04

  TRUNOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 24770/04

  USTALOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 34283/05

  OOO PKG 'SIB-YUKASS' v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 31296/02

  OSHER AND OSHER v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 966/03

  ALMAYEVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 3462/04

  VERSHININA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 7111/05

  PYLNOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 18762/06

  TELYATYEVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 21198/05

  AYRAPETYAN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 24842/04

  KLETSOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 26410/02

  KAZARTSEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 13910/04

  TARASOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 4171/04

  GRIDIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.12.2005 - 7363/04

  MIKRYUKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 25550/05

  KOROLEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 9253/06

  MIZYUK v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 20098/03

  KHVOROSTINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 374/03

  VOLOKITIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 2047/03

  SHAPOVALOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 10415/02

  CHERNYSHOV AND 11 OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 26089/02

  KORNEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 19798/04

  KORCHAGIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 1144/03

  ZAUGOLNOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 18557/06

  LYKOV v. RUSSIA