Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RUDEVITS v. LATVIA

  Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 4353/03

  TARARIEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 47590/06

  In addition, the positive obligations under Article 2 of the Convention require States to make regulations compelling hospitals, whether civil or prison, to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of patients" lives (see Tarariyeva v. Russia, no. 4353/03, § 74, ECHR 2006-XV (extracts), and Makharadze and Sikharulidze v. Georgia, no. 35254/07, § 73, 22 November 2011).
• EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 35254/07

  MAKHARADZE AND SIKHARULIDZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 47590/06

  In addition, the positive obligations under Article 2 of the Convention require States to make regulations compelling hospitals, whether civil or prison, to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of patients" lives (see Tarariyeva v. Russia, no. 4353/03, § 74, ECHR 2006-XV (extracts), and Makharadze and Sikharulidze v. Georgia, no. 35254/07, § 73, 22 November 2011).

• EGMR, 03.09.2020 - 4006/17

  KAMINSKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND

  In order to establish whether or not the respondent State complied with its obligation to protect J.F's life under Article 2 of the Convention, the Court must examine whether the relevant domestic authorities did everything that could have been required of them, in good faith and in a timely manner, to try to avert a fatal outcome (see Makharadze and Sikharulidze, cited above, § 74 and Rudevits v. Latvia (dec.), no. 47590/06, § 48, 26 June 2012).The Court will thus examine whether the medical treatment received in detention by the applicants" relative was timely and adequate (see Tarariyeva v. Russia, no. 4353/03, §§ 77-89, ECHR 2006-XV (extracts) and compare Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, no. 28005/08, § 166, 14 March 2013).