Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GAZSÓ v. HUNGARY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 13+6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 46 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 13+6-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial Non-pecuniary damage - award ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GAZSÓ v. HUNGARY - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Violation of Article 13+6-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 6-1 - Reasonable time;Article 6 - Right to a fair ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GAZSÓ v. HUNGARY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 48322/12
• EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 48322/12
• EGMR, 06.06.2019 - 48322/12
• EGMR, 03.09.2020 - 48322/12

Wird zitiert von ... (18)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01

  Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 48322/12

  It must further ensure that the remedy or remedies comply, both in theory and in practice, with the key criteria set by the Court (see Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, §§ 97-101, ECHR 2006-VII).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 48322/12

  30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 48322/12

  Such measures must also be taken in respect of other persons in the applicant's position, notably by solving the problems that have led to the Court's findings (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, §§ 94-95, ECHR 2005-X; and S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.

 
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 48322/12

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII. The Court reiterates that special diligence is necessary in employment disputes (see Ruotolo v. Italy, 27 February 1992, § 17, Series A no. 230-D; Mangualde Pinto v. France, no. 43491/98, § 27, 9 April 2002).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34884/97

  BOTTAZZI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 48322/12

  Accordingly, the situation in the present case must be qualified as resulting from a practice incompatible with the Convention (see Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 22, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2015 - 48322/12

  30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, ECHR 2008).

• EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 9988/23

  KOVÁCS v. HUNGARY

  In the leading case of Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015, the Court already found a violation of Article 6 because of the excessive length of civil proceedings.
• EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 13072/23

  BONUM TEAM KFT AND CSURAI v. HUNGARY

  In the leading case of Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015, the Court found a violation of Article 6 of the Convention in relation to the length of judicial proceedings.
• EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 14257/23

  DOLOWSCHIÁK v. HUNGARY

  In the leading case of Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015, the Court already found a violation of Article 6 because of the excessive length of civil proceedings.

 
• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 16771/23

  KAMARÁS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  In the leading case of Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015, the Court found a violation of Article 6 of the Convention in relation to the length of judicial proceedings.
• EGMR, 28.09.2023 - 32008/22

  PAPPNÉ KISPÁL v. HUNGARY

  The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the excessive length of civil proceedings (see, for example, Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015).
• EGMR, 19.05.2022 - 54765/20

  AVANTGARDE STÚDIÓ ÉS KIADÓ KFT. v. HUNGARY

  The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the excessive length of civil proceedings (see, for example, Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015).
• EGMR, 19.05.2022 - 25717/21

  ZSIFKOVICS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the excessive length of civil proceedings (see, for example, Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015).
• EGMR, 18.07.2017 - 31956/13

  LAKICS v. HUNGARY

  Having examined all the material submitted to it and having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement (see, mutatis mutandis, Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, § 17, 16 July 2015).
• EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 236/12

  KÉZDISZENTKERESZTI BÍRÓ v. HUNGARY

  Having examined all the material submitted to it and having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement (see, mutatis mutandis, Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, § 17, 16 July 2015).
• EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 20264/12

  RÁCZ v. HUNGARY

  Having examined all the material submitted to it and having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement (see, mutatis mutandis, Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, § 17, 16 July 2015).
• EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 42329/09

  VARGA v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 54602/11

  SINDELY v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 34384/21

  HARASZTIA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 07.04.2022 - 1572/21

  KECSKÉSNÉ TINKÓ AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 08.02.2018 - 40114/12

  NAGY v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 15.12.2015 - 29143/09

  KARACS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 76928/11

  MÁTYUS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 14.12.2017 - 80104/12

  BALOGH v. HUNGARY