Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JENSEN v. DENMARK

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1, Art. 39 MRK
  Struck out of the list (friendly settlement) (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 20.09.2001 - 48470/99
• EGMR, 14.02.2002 - 48470/99

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Zitiert selbst (1)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 20.12.2001 - 44704/98

  NORMANN v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.02.2002 - 48470/99

  "I declare that, with a view to securing a friendly settlement of [the application registered under no. 44704/98], the Government of Denmark offer to pay 30, 000 Danish kroner to Leif Graaskov Jensen.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.11.2006 - 44574/98

  KOVACIC ET AUTRES c. SLOVENIE

  Toutefois, s'appuyant sur les affaires Eckle c. Allemagne (arrêt du 15 juillet 1982, série A no 51, p. 32, §§ 69 et ss.), Jensen c. Danemark (déc.), no 48470/99, CEDH 2001-X) et Kljajic c. Croatie (no 22681/02, § 23, 17 mars 2005), il a souligné que « le statut de victime d'un requérant peut dépendre de l'indemnisation qui lui a été accordée au niveau national pour la situation dont celui-ci se plaint devant la Cour ainsi que du fait que les autorités nationales ont reconnu, explicitement ou en substance, la violation de la Convention ".
• EGMR, 12.06.2003 - 68693/01

  PEDERSEN v. DENMARK

  In this respect, the Court reiterates that an individual may be deprived of his status as a victim within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention if the domestic courts acknowledge, at least in substance, a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and consequently meter out a more lenient sentence or exempt the defendant from defraying legal costs (see inter alia Graaskov Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X).
• EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 64229/01

  KOZAROV v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  The Court observes that the court settlement concluded between the applicant and the Fund did not acknowledge any failure to comply with the "reasonable time" requirement within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention or afford the applicant redress in an express and measurable manner (see Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X).
• EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 42986/02

  T. DALSGAARD AND J. DALSGAARD v. DENMARK

  Thus, even assuming that the applicants' request for leave to appeal against the High Court's judgment related specifically to the length-of-the-proceedings-issue and that such a request may be considered an effective remedy (see, among others, Delanghe v. Belgium (dec.), no. 49716/99, 18 September 2001, and mutatis mutandis, Ohlen v. Denmark (striking out), no. 63214/00, 24 February 2005 and Graaskov Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X), the applicants have already made use of it.
• EGMR, 06.03.2003 - 63214/00

  OHLEN v. DENMARK

  The Court recalls, as to the question whether the applicant may continue to claim to be a victim of a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on the grounds of the length of criminal proceedings brought against him, that in order to deprive the individual concerned of his status as a victim within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention, the national authorities must have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way the failure to observe the reasonable time requirement and provided redress in relation thereto e.g. by reducing the sentence in an express and measurable manner (see the Eckle v. Germany judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66, Beck v. Norway, no. 26390/95, 26 June 2001, § 27, Graaskov Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X and Normann v. Denmark (dec.), no. 44704/98, 14 June 2001, unpublished).