Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KRZAK v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 34, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Inadmissible under Art. 6-1 with regard to criminal proceedings Inadmissible with regard to the second applicant Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim ...

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 51515/99

  Consequently, there is no justification for making any award to him under that head (see, mutatis mutandis Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 164, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 51515/99

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the criteria established by its case-law, particularly the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, Humen v. Poland [GC], no. 26614/95, § 60, 15 October 1999).

• EGMR, 03.09.2015 - 10161/13

  M. AND M. v. CROATIA

  The Court reiterates that the Convention does not guarantee a right to have criminal proceedings instituted against third persons or to have such persons convicted (see, among many other authorities, Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004-I, and Krzak v. Poland, no. 51515/99, § 24, 6 April 2004).
• EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 68747/11

  ZACHOULIS v. GREECE

  In this regard, the Court reiterates that the Convention does not guarantee the right to have criminal proceedings instituted against third persons or to have such persons convicted (see, among many other authorities, Perez v. France [GC], no. 7287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004 I, and Krzak v. Poland, no. 51515/99, § 24, 6 April 2004).
• EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 20940/03

  DUMBRAVEANU v. MOLDOVA

  They cited the cases of Burdov v. Russia (no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III), Slimane-Kaïd v. France (no. 3) (no. 45130/98, 6 April 2004) and Krzak v. Poland (no. 51515/99, 6 April 2004) where the applicants were awarded EUR 3, 000, EUR 8, 000 and EUR 3, 500 respectively for non-pecuniary damage.