Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LEDYAYEVA, DOBROKHOTOVA, ZOLOTAREVA and ROMASHINA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 8 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention and domestic proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 53157/99
• EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 53157/99, 53247/99, 56850/00, 53695/00

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 19.02.1998 - 14967/89

  GUERRA ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 53157/99

  As in the case Fadeyeva v. Russia (55723/00, judgment of 9 June 2005), without casting doubt on the Court's finding of a violation of Article 8, 1 would prefer to describe the violation as unjustified interference with the applicant's private life without mentioning "right to home" as it was done in the Guerra and Others v. Italy case (judgment of 19 February 1998, 14967/89, Reports 1998-I).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 53157/99

  Subject to monitoring by the Committee of Ministers, the respondent State remains free to choose the means by which it will discharge its legal obligation under Articles 41 and 46 of the Convention, provided that such means are compatible with the conclusions set out in the present judgment (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII), in particular, with the two alternative solutions examined by the Court (see paragraph 110 above).
• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 53157/99

  The Government concluded that these aspects of the present cases permitted to distinguish them from the case López Ostra v. Spain (judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 303-C, p. 46-47, § 16-22), where the plant had operated without the appropriate licence and had been finally closed.
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 53157/99

  Moreover, the level of persuasion necessary for reaching a particular conclusion and, in this connection, the distribution of the burden of proof are intrinsically linked to the specificity of the facts, the nature of the allegation made and the Convention right at stake (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 147, 6 July 2005, with further references).
• EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 11931/03

  TETERINY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 53157/99

  The population lived in those flats as life-long tenants under "social tenancy agreements" (for further details see Teteriny v. Russia, no. 11931/03, § 19 et seq.,, 30 June 2005).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 31612/09

  PAVLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  As in other cases concerning serious industrial pollution, in assessing whether the national authorities performed a balancing exercise in accordance with Article 8 of the Convention, the Court in the present case will examine primarily, although not exclusively, the findings of the domestic courts (see Ledyayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 53157/99 and three others, § 90, 26 October 2006,).

  Their homes are dispersed across the whole city at remote distances, ranging from 2 to 15 km from the polluting sites (contrast Fadeyeva, cited above, and Ledyayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 53157/99 and 3 others, 26 October 2006).

• EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 19437/05

  [ENG]

  53157/99, 53247/99, 56850/00 and 53695/00, 16 September 2004; and Fadayeva v. Russia (dec.), no. 55723/00, 16 October 2003, the last two as regards the complaints raised under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention).
• EGMR, 02.12.2010 - 12853/03

  IVAN ATANASOV v. BULGARIA

  The Court made similar findings in a later case concerning the same iron smelter (see Ledyayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 53157/99, 53247/99, 53695/00 and 56850/00, §§ 96-100, 26 October 2006).
• EGMR, 23.03.2006 - 63501/00

  KONOVALOV v. RUSSIA

  53157/99, 53695/00, 53247/99 and 56850/00, 16 September 2004).