Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  OKHRIMENKO v. UKRAINE

  Art. 3, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible No violations of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) No violation of Art. 34 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 53896/07
• EGMR, 21.10.2020 - 53896/07

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 53896/07

  The Court has emphasised on a number of occasions that the health of prisoners has to be adequately secured (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI).

  The assessment of this level is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, among other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI, and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III).

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 53896/07

  However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 53896/07

  The assessment of this level is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, among other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI, and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 30983/02

  GRISHIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 53896/07

  It further held that it was "prepared to accept that in principle the resources of medical facilities within the penitentiary system are limited compared to those of civil[ian] clinics" (see Grishin v. Russia, no. 30983/02, § 76, 15 November 2007).
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 40679/98

  DANKEVICH v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 53896/07

  Once this burden of proof has been satisfied, it falls to the applicant to establish that the remedy advanced by the Government was in fact used or was for some reason inadequate and ineffective in the particular circumstances of the case, or that there existed special circumstances absolving him or her from this requirement (see, for example, Dankevich v. Ukraine, no. 40679/98, § 107, 29 April 2003).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen