Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Doctrine(Abodienst, kostenloses Probeabo)
  Mit KI-Zusammenfassung und KI-Dialogfeld, um Fragen zur Entscheidung stellen.
  Doctrine ist die neue umfassende Rechts-KI-Plattform in Kooperation mit dejure.org. Mehr Informationen

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MANUKYAN v. ARMENIA

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• otto-schmidt.de (Kurzinformation)

  Recht auf Achtung des Privat- und Familienlebens - Armenien: Erhebung und Speicherung personenbezogener Daten durch Geheimdienst und Nötigung zur Zusammenarbeit

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MANUKYAN v. ARMENIA

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (11)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 215/19

  Diskriminierung: Deutschland hat Racial-Profiling-Vorwurf nicht genug geprüft

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2025 - 5778/17

  65286/13 57270/14, § 112, 10 January 2019; and Basu v. Germany, no. 215/19, § 32, 18 October 2022).
• EGMR, 10.01.2019 - 65286/13

  KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2025 - 5778/17

  65286/13 57270/14, § 112, 10 January 2019; and Basu v. Germany, no. 215/19, § 32, 18 October 2022).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  Britische DNA-Datenbanken verstoßen gegen die Europäische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2025 - 5778/17

  In any event, the mere storage by a public authority of information relating to an individual's private life amounts to an interference within the meaning of Article 8, irrespective of whether the data was subsequently used or whether the applicant experienced any inconvenience (see Amann, cited above, §§ 69-70; S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 67, ECHR 2008; and M.D. and Others v. Spain, no. 36584/17, § 55, 28 June 2022).

• EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 11519/20

  GLUKHIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2025 - 5778/17

  The Court has previously held that the collection and storage of data by a public authority on particular individuals constituted an interference with private life (see Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, §§ 65 and 69, ECHR 2000-II; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, §§ 43 and 46, ECHR 2000-V; and Glukhin v. Russia, no. 11519/20, § 67, 4 July 2023).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2025 - 5778/17

  In any event, the mere storage by a public authority of information relating to an individual's private life amounts to an interference within the meaning of Article 8, irrespective of whether the data was subsequently used or whether the applicant experienced any inconvenience (see Amann, cited above, §§ 69-70; S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 67, ECHR 2008; and M.D. and Others v. Spain, no. 36584/17, § 55, 28 June 2022).
• EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  INTIGAM ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2025 - 5778/17

  68762/14 and 71200/14, § 186, 20 September 2018; and Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 68817/14, § 156, 16 July 2020).
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 10851/13

  KIRÁLY AND DÖMÖTÖR v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2025 - 5778/17

  Personal autonomy constitutes an important principle underlying the interpretation of the guarantees afforded by Article 8 (see Király and Dömötör v. Hungary, no. 10851/13, § 41, 17 January 2017).
• EGMR, 16.07.2020 - 68817/14

  YUNUSOVA AND YUNUSOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2025 - 5778/17

  68762/14 and 71200/14, § 186, 20 September 2018; and Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 68817/14, § 156, 16 July 2020).
• EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 36584/17

  M.D. ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2025 - 5778/17

  In any event, the mere storage by a public authority of information relating to an individual's private life amounts to an interference within the meaning of Article 8, irrespective of whether the data was subsequently used or whether the applicant experienced any inconvenience (see Amann, cited above, §§ 69-70; S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 67, ECHR 2008; and M.D. and Others v. Spain, no. 36584/17, § 55, 28 June 2022).
• EGMR, 08.03.2022 - 53069/15

  SABANI c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2025 - 5778/17

  It was therefore for the Government, should they have chosen to do so, to discharge the burden of convincingly refuting the applicant's allegations (see, mutatis mutandis, Sabani v. Belgium, no. 53069/15, § 43, 8 March 2022).
• EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 42716/02

  TOMA AGAINST ROMANIA

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR - 4071/21 (anhängig)

  BOZKURT v. TÜRKİYE

  Did the State have a positive obligation under Article 8 of the Convention to conduct an effective investigation into the applicant's allegations? If so, was the conduct of the criminal proceedings against the police officers compatible with the procedural obligations inherent in Article 8 of the Convention (see Manukyan v. Armenia, no. 5778/17, §§ 65-67, 13 November 2025; M.Ş.D. v. Romania, no. 28935/21, § 125, 3 December 2024; M.D. and Others v. Spain, no. 36584/17, § 58, 28 June 2022; F.O. v. Croatia, cited above, § 91; and H.M. v. Turkey, no. 34494/97, §§ 26-30, 8 August 2006)?.