Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  A.D. AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  A.D. v. GEORGIA and 1 other application

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 17.01.2019 - 29683/16

  X v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2022 - 57864/17

  Other relevant international legal materials of a general nature concerning legal gender recognition in Europe, including those issued by various Council of Europe bodies, were summarised in the Court's judgment in X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (no. 29683/16, §§ 31-34, 17 January 2019).

  They submitted that the situation in Georgia was very similar to that described in X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (no. 29683/16, § 36, 17 January 2019), or even worse.

• RG, 13.02.1924 - V 29/23

  Muß der Testamentsvollstrecker den zur Vorbereitung der Erbteilung erforderlichen …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2022 - 57864/17

  In States that permit the modification of gender markers on identity documents abusive requirements can be imposed, such as forced or otherwise involuntary gender reassignment surgery, sterilization or other coercive medical procedures (A/HRC/29/23).

  In his report of 4 May 2015 to the Human Rights Council, entitled "Discriminatory laws and practices and acts of violence against individuals based on their sexual orientation and gender identity" (A/HRC/29/23), the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights observed the following (paragraphs 70 and 79):.

• EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 2145/16

  X. c. ROUMANIE et 1 autre affaire

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2022 - 57864/17

  Noting the Government's challenge to the applicability of Article 8 to the dispute over the change of sex/gender markers in civil-status records, the Court reiterates that issues relating to the legal recognition of the gender identity of transgender people - which are essentially construed around the question of whether and under which exact legal conditions sex/gender markers can be changed - fall squarely, by virtue of being an important component of transgender people's right to personal identity, development and physical and moral security, within the scope of the right to respect for private life under Article 8 of the Convention (see X and Y v. Romania, nos. 2145/16 and 20607/16, § 171, 19 January 2021; S.V. v. Italy, cited above, § 77; and A.P., Garçon and Nicot, cited above, §§ 158 and 160).

• EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 17767/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2022 - 57864/17

  As regards the Government's objection of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, the Court reiterates that it has already found the lodging of an individual constitutional complaint in Georgia to be an ineffective remedy for the purposes of Article 35 of the Convention, mainly on account of the Constitutional Court's inability, the legal situation which is currently still in force, to set aside individual decisions by the public authorities or courts which directly affect complainants' rights (see Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 35-46, ECHR 2006-XIV; Mumladze v. Georgia, no. 30097/03, § 37, 8 January 2008; and Khoniakina v. Georgia, no. 17767/08, § 59, 19 June 2012).
• EGMR, 10.02.2022 - 73975/16

  A AND B v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2022 - 57864/17

  In these circumstances, the submissions of 1 August 2019 cannot be taken into consideration by the Court (compare, among other authorities, A and B v. Georgia, no. 73975/16, § 58, 10 February 2022, with further references).
• EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 30097/03

  MUMLADZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2022 - 57864/17

  As regards the Government's objection of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, the Court reiterates that it has already found the lodging of an individual constitutional complaint in Georgia to be an ineffective remedy for the purposes of Article 35 of the Convention, mainly on account of the Constitutional Court's inability, the legal situation which is currently still in force, to set aside individual decisions by the public authorities or courts which directly affect complainants' rights (see Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 35-46, ECHR 2006-XIV; Mumladze v. Georgia, no. 30097/03, § 37, 8 January 2008; and Khoniakina v. Georgia, no. 17767/08, § 59, 19 June 2012).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EuGH, 04.10.2024 - C-4/23

  Mirin - Änderungen des Geschlechts und des Vornamens müssen anerkannt werden

  Zudem verfügen die Staaten angesichts der besonderen Bedeutung dieses Rechts in diesem Bereich nur über einen begrenzten Ermessensspielraum (EGMR, 19. Januar 2021, X und Y/Rumänien, CE:ECHR:2021:0119JUD000214516, §§ 146 bis 148 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung, sowie EGMR, 1. Dezember 2022, A. D. u. a./Georgien, CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD005786417, § 71).
• EGMR, 22.06.2023 - 54006/20

  KÖNYVES-TÓTH v. HUNGARY

  It is indeed from the point of view of the latter, very specific positive obligation that the Court will proceed with its task in the present case is to assess whether, in view of the margin of appreciation available to it, the respondent State struck a fair balance between the general interest and the individual interest of the applicants in having their "sex/gender marker" changed in the civil-status records, and by extension in all their official identity documents, to match their gender identity (see A.D. and Others v. Georgia, nos. 57864/17 and 2 others, § 73, 1 December 2022).

  It is evident that the Chamber has limited the scope of the Contracting Parties' obligation on legal gender recognition as clearly formulated in the X. case and reiterated recently in A.D. and Others v. Georgia (nos. 57864/17 and 2 others, § 73, 1 December 2022).

• EGMR - 35066/23 (anhängig)

  I.N.I. c. BULGARIE et 1 autre affaire

  L'absence alléguée d'une réglementation législative en matière de changement de sexe et le refus des tribunaux internes de reconnaître la conversion sexuelle de la requérante, ainsi que de modifier ses nom et prénom, au motif qu'elle n'avait pas établi le caractère complet de sa conversion sexuelle, portent-ils atteinte à son droit au respect de sa vie privée au sens de l'article 8 de la Convention (voir Christine Goodwin c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 28957/95, §§ 76-93, CEDH 2002-VI, Hämäläinen c. Finlande ([GC], no 37359/09, §§ 65-67, CEDH 2014), A.P., Garçon et Nicot c. France, nos 79885/12 et 2 autres, §§ 92-94 et 126-135, 6 avril 2017, X c. l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine, no 29683/16, § 38, 17 janvier 2019, X et Y c. Roumanie, nos 2145/16 et 20607/16, §§ 158-168, 19 janvier 2021, A.D. et autres c. Géorgie, nos 57864/17 et 2 autres, §§ 71-76, 1er décembre 2022, et R.K. c. Hongrie, no 54006/20, § 76, 22 juin 2023) ?.

  L'absence alléguée d'une réglementation législative en matière de changement de sexe, le refus des juridictions internes de reconnaître la réassignation du sexe de la requérante pendant une durée dépassant six ans, et les évènements survenus après l'arrêt de la Cour rendu en faveur de la requérante le 27 septembre 2022, portent-ils atteinte à son droit au respect de sa vie privée au sens de l'article 8 de la Convention (voir Christine Goodwin c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 28957/95, §§ 76-93, CEDH 2002-VI, Hämäläinen c. Finlande ([GC], no 37359/09, §§ 65-67, CEDH 2014), A.P., Garçon et Nicot c. France, nos 79885/12 et 2 autres, §§ 92-94 et 126-135, 6 avril 2017, X c. l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine, no 29683/16, § 38, 17 janvier 2019, X et Y c. Roumanie, nos 2145/16 et 20607/16, §§ 158-168, 19 janvier 2021, A.D. et autres c. Géorgie, nos 57864/17 et 2 autres, §§ 71-76, 1er décembre 2022, et R.K. c. Hongrie, no 54006/20, § 76, 22 juin 2023) ?.

• EGMR, 12.06.2025 - 33037/22

  T.H. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Rn. 49 The Court has already found that it is the States' positive obligation under Article 8 to provide quick, transparent and accessible procedures for changing the registered sex/gender marker of transgender people (see A.D. and Others v. Georgia, nos. 57864/17 and 2 others, 1 December 2022, and R.K. v. Hungary, cited above).
• EGMR, 04.07.2024 - 41701/16

  Y.T. c. BULGARIE

  Elle rappelle que les autorités des États parties, y compris les autorités bulgares, sont soumises à l'obligation de respecter les principes établis dans la jurisprudence en la matière (Fedotova et autres c. Russie [GC], nos 40792/10 et 2 autres, §§ 164 et 178, 17 janvier 2023 et, plus particulièrement, S.V. c. Italie, no 55216/08, 11 octobre 2018, X c. l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine, no 29683/16, 17 janvier 2019, X et Y c. Roumanie, précité, A.D. et autres c. Géorgie, nos 57864/17 et 2 autres, 1er décembre 2022, et R.K. c. Hongrie, no 54006/20, 22 juin 2023, voir aussi Hämäläinen c. Finlande [GC], no 37359/09, §§ 65-67, CEDH 2014, avec les références qui s'y trouvent citées).
• EGMR, 11.07.2024 - 28407/19

  LTD 'BEQANASI' v. GEORGIA

  Rn. 10 As to the second limb of the Government's non-exhaustion objection, which concerned the possibility of the applicant company to complain before the Constitutional Court in parallel and not after the finalisation of the administrative offence proceedings, the Court points out that it has already examined, in previous cases against Georgia, the effectiveness of the individual constitutional complaint for the purposes of Article 35 of the Convention and concluded that the Constitutional Court could not be considered an effective remedy which the applicants had been required to pursue (see A.D. and Others v. Georgia, nos. 57864/17 and 2 others, § 50, 1 December 2022, with further references).
• EGMR, 13.02.2024 - 66078/17

  CSIKÓS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY and 1 other application

  57864/17 and 2 others, 1 December 2022; and X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 29683/16, 17 January 2019).