Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 47676/99, 58923/00, 58927/00, 61373/00, 61377/00 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BEET AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 5, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 41, Art. 6 Abs. 1+6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
Violation of Art. 5-1 with regard to one applicant Violation of Art. 5-5 with regard to one applicant Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c with regard to four applicants Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (with regard to one applicant) Non-pecuniary damage - finding of ...
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 26.11.1991 - 13585/88
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 47676/99
Accordingly, the Court concludes that the legal costs and expenses for which the applicants claim reimbursement, pursuant to Article 41 of the Convention, cannot, in all cases, be considered to have been "necessarily" incurred or to be "reasonable as to quantum" (see the Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, pp. 37-38, § 80). - EGMR, 13.06.1994 - 10588/83
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 47676/99
The Court recalls that, as regards claims for pecuniary loss, its case-law establishes that there must be a clear causal connection between the damage claimed by the applicant and the violation of the Convention and that this may, in the appropriate case, include compensation in respect of loss of earnings (see, amongst other authorities, Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain (former Article 50), judgment of 13 June 1994, Series A no. 285-C, pp. - EGMR, 09.04.1984 - 8966/80
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 47676/99
As regards violations of Article 6, the Court's case-law indicates that it will not speculate as to what might have occurred had there been no breach of the procedural guarantees of this provision (the above-cited Benham judgment, § 68, and Findlay v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 February 1997, Reports 1997-I, §§ 84-88) unless it finds special features in the case amounting to a "real loss of opportunity" (Perks, §§ 80-81, and Goddi v. Italy, judgment of 9 April 1984, Series A no. 76, § 35). - EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 29798/96
LLOYD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 47676/99
29798/96 and others, judgment of 1 March 2005, §§ 35-87; hereinafter "Lloyd"). - EGMR, 21.10.2003 - 47675/99
McANDREW and 10 OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 47676/99
The Court has set out the relevant facts pertaining to each applicant in the table which appears at the end of the decision on admissibility (47675/99, McAndrew and Others v. the United Kingdom, decision of 21 October 2003).
- EGMR, 21.10.2003 - 47675/99
McANDREW and 10 OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
1. Julie BEET (47676/99).(i) Julie BEET (47676/99).
Beet (47676/99).
Fogg (58923/00).
Telfer (61373/00).
Moore (58927/00).
Rigby (61377/00).
Fogg (58923/00), Moore (58927/00), Telfer (61373/00), Rigby (61377/00) and Dann (3859/02).
McAndrew (47675/99), Beet (47676/99), Daldry (58896/00), Ryan (61370/00), Broadhurst (69187/01) and Parkes (3766/02).
(ii) Stephen MOORE (58927/00).
(iii) Edward TELFER (61373/00).
(iv) Josephine RIGBY (61377/00).
No further representations in relation to Article 6 of the Convention were made on behalf of McAndrew (47675/99), Beet (47676/99), Fogg (58923/00), Ryan (61370/00) or Parkes (3766/02).
(a) The complaints under Article 6 of the applicants Daldry (58896/00) and Moore (58927/00) that their committal orders were issued in their absence.
The Court observes that, in their submissions in response to those of the Government about the admissibility and merits of these applications, the applicants Daldry (58896/00) and Moore (58927/00), whose committal orders were issued in their absence, complained that the fact of their absence constituted or contributed towards a violation of Article 6.
Fogg (58923/00).
Telfer (61373/00).
Moore (58927/00).
Rigby (61377/00).
Beet (47676/99).
Beet (47676/99).
Fogg (58923/00).
Telfer (61373/00).
Moore (58927/00).
Rigby (61377/00).
Fogg (58923/00).
Telfer (61373/00).
Moore (58927/00).
Rigby (61377/00).
Beet (47676/99).
Declares inadmissible the complaint under Article 6 of the applicants Daldry (58896/00) and Moore (58927/00) that their committal orders were issued in their absence;.
47676/99.
58923/00.
58927/00.
61373/00.
61377/00.
- EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 6773/02
DAMIAN-BURUEANA ET DAMIAN c. ROUMANIE
La Cour estime que les montants octroyés par les juridictions internes, bien qu'inférieurs à ceux que les requérants avaient demandés, ne semblent pas déraisonnables, eu égard aux circonstances et à la jurisprudence de la Cour en la matière (voir, parmi d'autres, Castravet c. Moldova, no 23393/05, 13 mars 2007, D.P. c. Pologne, no 34221/96, 20 janvier 2004, G.K. c. Pologne, no 38816/97, 20 janvier 2004, Beet et autres c. Royaume-Uni, nos 47676/99, 58923/00, 58927/00, 61373/00 et 61377/00, 1er mars 2005 et Asenov c. Bulgarie, no 42026/98, 15 juillet 2005) et ne permet pas de conclure que les tribunaux ont rendu le droit garanti par l'article 5 § 5 de la Convention « théorique ou illusoire'(Attard c. Malte (déc.), no 46750/99, 28 septembre 2000 et Stoianova et Nedelcu, précitée).
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".