Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  A.M. v. TURKEY

  Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  A.M. v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 67199/17

  Accordingly, many laws are inevitably couched in terms which, to a greater or lesser extent, are vague, and whose interpretation and application are questions of practice (see, for example, Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 41, ECHR 2007-IV, Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 141, ECHR 2012, and Delfi AS, cited above, § 121).
• EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 346/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 67199/17

  346/04 and 39779/04, § 48, 27 May 2014).
• EGMR, 19.04.2018 - 6477/08

  HAJIBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 67199/17

  In the present case, even assuming that there is a causal link between the damage claimed and the violation found, the Court observes that the applicant did not submit relevant documentary evidence supporting this part of their claim (see, inter alia, Hajibeyli and Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, nos. 6477/08 and 10414/08, § 73, 19 April 2018).

• EGMR, 22.02.2005 - 35839/97

  PAKDEMIRLI c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 67199/17

  (see, for a similar approach, Pakdemirli v. Turkey, no. 35839/97, § 63, 22 February 2005, Mustafa Erdoğan and Others v. Turkey, nos.
• EGMR, 25.01.2005 - 37096/97

  Karademirci u.a. ./. Türkei

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 67199/17

  The applicant could not, therefore, reasonably have foreseen that his statements would be considered to be within the scope of section of the Criminal Code relating to genocide and crimes against humanity (see, for instance, Karademirci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 37096/97 and 37101/97, § 42, ECHR 2005-I).
• EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 8402/17

  MALIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 67199/17

  Since the applicant failed to submit itemised claims or any supporting documents or particulars concerning the costs and expenses incurred in the domestic proceedings or those before the Court, as required under Rule 60 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court, the Court dismisses his claims (see, mutatis mutandis, Malić v. Croatia, Committee judgment no. 8402/17, § 34, 22 April 2021).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 38976/18

  YAZICI v. TÜRKIYE

  37096/97 and 37101/97, § 42, ECHR 2005-I; and A.M. v. Turkey [Committee], no. 67199/17, §§ 35-36, 19 October 2021).