Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ALEXANDRESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 56842/08, 56844/08, 56849/08, 56860/08, 696/09, 704/09, 724/09, 11022/09
• EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 56842/08

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 56842/08

  ALEXANDRESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 56842/08

  56860/08, 724/09 and 11022/09.

  56860/08.

  724/09.

  11022/09.

• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 56842/08

  The Court reiterates that ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum level of severity is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, inter alia, Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-IX, Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 91, 22 May 2012, and Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 86, 28 September 2015).
• EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99

  PEREZ c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 56842/08

  As civil-party proceedings constitute a civil action for reparation of damage caused by an offence and the outcome of the criminal investigation is decisive for the "civil right" in question, the proceedings come within the field of application of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, §§ 62-66 and 74-75, ECHR 2004-I, Krumpel and Krumpelová v. Slovakia, no. 56195/00, §§ 45-49, 5 July 2005, and Javor and Javorová v. Slovakia, no. 42360/10, §§ 46-66, 15 September 2015).

• EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 56842/08

  The Court reiterates that ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum level of severity is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, inter alia, Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-IX, Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 91, 22 May 2012, and Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 86, 28 September 2015).
• EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 40756/06

  VLAD AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 56842/08

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case; the conduct of the applicants and of the relevant authorities; and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Vlad and Others v. Romania, nos. 40756/06, 41508/07 and 50806/07, § 131, 26 November 2013).
• EGMR - 45886/07

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 56842/08

  The main facts of these cases concerning the crackdown on anti-government demonstrations between 13 to 15 June 1990 are similar to those presented in Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC] (nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, §§ 14-49, 55-72, 78-110, and 137-168, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 33810/07

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 56842/08

  The facts of the cases, as submitted by the parties, are similar to those presented in Association "21 December 1989" and Others v. Romania (nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, §§ 12-41, 24 May 2011) and in Bosnigeanu and Others v. Romania (nos. 56861/08 and 33 others, §§ 5-15, 4 November 2014).
• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 56195/00

  KRUMPEL AND KRUMPELOVA v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 56842/08

  As civil-party proceedings constitute a civil action for reparation of damage caused by an offence and the outcome of the criminal investigation is decisive for the "civil right" in question, the proceedings come within the field of application of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, §§ 62-66 and 74-75, ECHR 2004-I, Krumpel and Krumpelová v. Slovakia, no. 56195/00, §§ 45-49, 5 July 2005, and Javor and Javorová v. Slovakia, no. 42360/10, §§ 46-66, 15 September 2015).
• EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 42360/10

  JAVOR AND JAVOROVÁ v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 56842/08

  As civil-party proceedings constitute a civil action for reparation of damage caused by an offence and the outcome of the criminal investigation is decisive for the "civil right" in question, the proceedings come within the field of application of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, §§ 62-66 and 74-75, ECHR 2004-I, Krumpel and Krumpelová v. Slovakia, no. 56195/00, §§ 45-49, 5 July 2005, and Javor and Javorová v. Slovakia, no. 42360/10, §§ 46-66, 15 September 2015).
• EGMR - 56849/08 (anhängig)

  BALAS SALCOCI et ROMANESCU c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 56842/08

  56849/08.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 56842/08

  ALEXANDRESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  724/09 and 11022/09;.

  Decides to strike application no. 724/09 lodged by Mr Cristian Paţurcă and application no. 11022/09 lodged by Mrs Laura Veronica Stoica out of its list.