Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SAVOVI v. BULGARIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) Non-pecuniary damage - award ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Savovi v. Bulgaria

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (3)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 02.08.1984 - 8691/79

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 7222/05

  Although the lawfulness of the surveillance under the national law was not fully examined by the domestic courts, the lack of clarity which emerges from the present case as to the circumstances in which the use of surveillance measures may be requested and granted, the persons who have the authority to request such measures, and their powers and obligations, sits ill, in the Court's opinion, with the requirements of paragraph 2 of Article 8 and the Court's case-law, according to which the relevant law must lay down with reasonable clarity the essential elements of the authorities" powers in the domain of secret surveillance (see Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, § 79, Series A no. 82).
• EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 27798/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 7222/05

  Consequently, the law must indicate the scope of any discretion conferred on the authorities and the manner of its exercise with sufficient clarity, having regard to the legitimate aim of the measure in question, to give the individual adequate protection against arbitrary interference (see Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 56, ECHR 2000-II, and Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, § 62, 1 July 2008).
• EGMR, 01.07.2008 - 58243/00

  LIBERTY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 7222/05

  Consequently, the law must indicate the scope of any discretion conferred on the authorities and the manner of its exercise with sufficient clarity, having regard to the legitimate aim of the measure in question, to give the individual adequate protection against arbitrary interference (see Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 56, ECHR 2000-II, and Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, § 62, 1 July 2008).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 16.11.2021 - 7610/15

  VASILEV v. BULGARIA

  Until late 2012, there were no final judgments under section 2(1)(7) (see Hadzhiev, cited above, § 30 in fine; Savovi v. Bulgaria, no. 7222/05, § 40 in fine, 27 November 2012; and Lenev, cited above, § 86 in fine).
• EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 53626/14

  HARIZANOV c. BULGARIE

  La Cour a réitéré ce même constat dans une série d'affaires subséquentes contre la Bulgarie concernant des faits qui étaient survenus avant 2009 (Hadzhiev c. Bulgarie, no 22373/04, §§ 53 et 54, 23 octobre 2012, Savovi c. Bulgarie, no 7222/05, § 65, 27 novembre 2012, et Lenev c. Bulgarie, no 41452/07, § 138, 4 décembre 2012).