Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SALEM v. DENMARK

  No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SALEM v. DENMARK

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 4, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 4 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (46)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.04.2006 - 14474/03

  COMERT v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 77036/11

  Furthermore, as case-law has shown, in such cases the nature and seriousness of the offence committed or the offending history may outweigh the other criteria to take into account (see, for example, Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], cited above, §§ 62-64 and Cömert v. Denmark (dec.), 14474/03, 10 April 2006).
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 77036/11

  The Court reaffirms at the outset that a State is entitled, as a matter of international law and subject to its treaty obligations, to control the entry of aliens into its territory and their residence there (see, among many other authorities, Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 67, Series A no. 94).
• EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 47486/06

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 77036/11

  The Court has held on previous occasions that it understands - in view of the devastating effects drugs have on people's lives - why the authorities show great firmness to those who actively contribute to the spread of this scourge (see, among others, Savasci v. Germany (dec.), 45971/08, § 27, 19 March 2013; Samsonnikov v. Estonia, cited above, § 49; A.W. Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 47486/06, § 40; 12 January 2010; Sezen v. the Netherlands, no. 50252/99, § 43, 31 January 2006; and Amrollahi v. Denmark, no. 56811/00, § 37, 11 July 2002).

• EGMR, 19.03.2013 - 45971/08

  SAVASCI v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 77036/11

  The Court has held on previous occasions that it understands - in view of the devastating effects drugs have on people's lives - why the authorities show great firmness to those who actively contribute to the spread of this scourge (see, among others, Savasci v. Germany (dec.), 45971/08, § 27, 19 March 2013; Samsonnikov v. Estonia, cited above, § 49; A.W. Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 47486/06, § 40; 12 January 2010; Sezen v. the Netherlands, no. 50252/99, § 43, 31 January 2006; and Amrollahi v. Denmark, no. 56811/00, § 37, 11 July 2002).
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 60286/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 77036/11

  The relevant criteria to be applied, in determining whether an interference is necessary in a democratic society, was set out, inter alia, in Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], cited above, §§ 54-55 and 57-58; Maslov v. Austria [GC], cited above, §§ 72-73; Balogun v. the United Kingdom, no. 60286/09, § 46, 10 April 2012; and Samsonnikov v. Estonia, no. 52178/10, § 86, 3 July 2012.
• EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 52178/10

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.12.2016 - 77036/11

  The relevant criteria to be applied, in determining whether an interference is necessary in a democratic society, was set out, inter alia, in Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], cited above, §§ 54-55 and 57-58; Maslov v. Austria [GC], cited above, §§ 72-73; Balogun v. the United Kingdom, no. 60286/09, § 46, 10 April 2012; and Samsonnikov v. Estonia, no. 52178/10, § 86, 3 July 2012.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 09.07.2021 - 6697/18

  Syrien: Wartefrist von 3 Jahren für Familienzusammenführung widerspricht Artikel …

  On the other hand, it appears that they had the possibility of maintaining contact, inter alia, via phone calls and text messages (see paragraph 83 above and also, inter alia, Salem v. Denmark, no. 77036/11, § 81, 1 December 2016).
• EGMR, 20.12.2018 - 18706/16

  In Deutschland geborener Straftäter darf abgeschoben werden

  Der Gerichtshof hat wiederholt zum Ausdruck gebracht, dass er in Anbetracht der verheerenden Auswirkungen von Drogen auf das Leben von Menschen nachvollziehen kann, warum die Behörden mit großer Entschlossenheit gegen diejenigen vorgehen, die aktiv zur Verbreitung dieses Übels beitragen (siehe u. a. Salem ./. Dänemark, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 77036/11, Rdnr. 66, 1. Dezember 2016;… S. /. Deutschland, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 45971/08, Rdnr. 27, 19. März 2013).
• EGMR, 07.07.2026 - 14983/25

  ALLABED v. DENMARK

  Rn. 13 The relevant provisions of the Aliens Act (Udlændingeloven) relating to expulsion have been set out in detail in, for example, Munir Johana v. Denmark (no. 56803/18, §§ 23-26, 12 January 2021), Salem v. Denmark (no. 77036/11, §§ 49-52, 1 December 2016) and Sharafane v. Denmark (no. 5199/23, §§ 11-14, 12 November 2024).

  Rn. 36 The Court finds it established that there has been an interference with the applicant's right to respect for his private and family life within the meaning of Article 8, that the expulsion order and the re-entry ban were "in accordance with the law", and that they pursued the legitimate aim of preventing disorder and crime (see also, for example, Salem v. Denmark, no. 77036/11, § 61, 1 December 2016).

• EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 41697/12

  KRASNIQI v. AUSTRIA

  Furthermore, as case-law has shown, in such cases the nature and seriousness of the offence committed or the offending history may outweigh the other criteria to be taken into account (see, for example, Üner, cited above, §§ 62-64, and Salem v. Denmark, no. 77036/11, § 76, 1 December 2016).
• EGMR, 12.11.2024 - 3645/23

  SAVURAN v. DENMARK

  Rn. 14 The relevant provisions of the Aliens Act (Udlændingeloven) relating to expulsion have been set out in detail in, for example, Munir Johana v. Denmark (no. 56803/18, §§ 23-26, 12 January 2021) and Salem v. Denmark (no. 77036/11, §§ 49-52, 1 December 2016).

  Rn. 26 The Court finds it established that there was an interference with the applicant's right to respect for his private life within the meaning of Article 8, that the expulsion order and the re-entry ban were "in accordance with the law", and that they pursued the legitimate aim of preventing disorder and crime (see also, for example, Salem v. Denmark, no. 77036/11, § 61, 1 December 2016).

• EGMR, 12.11.2024 - 5199/23

  SHARAFANE v. DENMARK

  Rn. 11 The relevant provisions of the Aliens Act (Udlændingeloven) relating to expulsion have been set out in detail in, for example, Munir Johana v. Denmark (no. 56803/18, §§ 23-26, 12 January 2021) and Salem v. Denmark (no. 77036/11, §§ 49-52, 1 December 2016).

  Rn. 48 The Court finds it established that there was an interference with the applicant's right to respect for his private life within the meaning of Article 8, that the expulsion order and the re-entry ban were "in accordance with the law", and that they pursued the legitimate aim of preventing disorder and crime (see also, for example, Salem v. Denmark, no. 77036/11, § 61, 1 December 2016).

• EGMR, 16.05.2017 - 25748/15

  HAMESEVIC v. DENMARK

  The relevant provisions of the Aliens Act (udlændingeloven) relating to expulsion were recently set out in detail in Salem v. Denmark, no. 77036/11, §§ 49-52, 1 December 2016.

  The Court has recently examined the proceedings under section 50, subsection 1, of the Aliens Act and noted (see Salem v. Denmark, no. 77036/11, § 56, 1 December 2016) that this remedy empowers the domestic courts to rescind the expulsion decision included in the original judgment.

• EGMR, 12.11.2024 - 14171/23

  AL-HABEEB v. DENMARK

  Rn. 13 The relevant provisions of the Aliens Act (Udlændingeloven) relating to expulsion have been set out in detail in, for example, Munir Johana v. Denmark (no. 56803/18, §§ 23-26, 12 January 2021) and Salem v. Denmark (no. 77036/11, §§ 49-52, 1 December 2016).

  Rn. 51 The Court finds it established that there was an interference with the applicant's right to respect for his private and family life within the meaning of Article 8, that the expulsion order and the re-entry ban were "in accordance with the law", and that they pursued the legitimate aim of preventing disorder and crime (see also, for example, Salem v. Denmark, no. 77036/11, § 61, 1 December 2016).

• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 16711/15

  MOHAMMAD v. DENMARK

  The relevant provisions of the Aliens Act (Udlændingeloven) relating to expulsion were set out in detail, for example, in Salem v. Denmark, no. 77036/11, §§ 49-52, 1 December 2016.

  The Court considers it established that there was an interference with the applicant's right to respect for his private life within the meaning of Article 8, that the expulsion order was "in accordance with the law", and that it pursued the legitimate aim of preventing disorder and crime (see also, for example, Salem v. Denmark, no. 77036/11, § 61, 1 December 2016).

• EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 19866/21

  SARAC v. DENMARK

  Rn. 14 The relevant provisions of the Aliens Act (Udlændingeloven) relating to expulsion have been set out in detail in, for example, Munir Johana v. Denmark (no. 56803/18, §§ 23-26, 12 January 2021) and Salem v. Denmark (no. 77036/11, §§ 49-52, 1 December 2016).

  Rn. 25 The Court finds it established that there was an interference with the applicant's right to respect for his private life within the meaning of Article 8, that the expulsion order and the re-entry ban were "in accordance with the law" and that they pursued the legitimate aim of preventing disorder and crime (see also, for example, Salem v. Denmark, no. 77036/11, § 61, 1 December 2016).

• EGMR, 15.07.2025 - 2852/24

  MIARI v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 44810/20

  NOORZAE v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 31434/21

  SHARIFI v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 2116/21

  NGUYEN v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 35740/21

  AL-MASUDI v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 28.07.2020 - 25402/14

  PORMES v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30441/09

  KÜLEKCI v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 12.11.2024 - 9588/21

  WINTHER v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 51301/22

  WANGTHAN v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 24379/20

  BAJRAMI v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 18646/22

  GOMA v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 42517/15

  YURDAER v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 7841/14

  LEVAKOVIC v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 18.12.2018 - 76550/13

  SABER ET BOUGHASSAL c. ESPAGNE
• EGMR, 12.01.2021 - 26957/19

  KHAN v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 12.01.2021 - 56803/18

  MUNIR JOHANA v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 11.04.2023 - 57766/19

  LOUKILI v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 41643/19

  ABDI v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 74411/16

  SAID ABDUL SALAM MUBARAK v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 40240/19

  AVCI v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 25593/14

  ASSEM HASSAN ALI v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 06.06.2017 - 33809/15

  ALAM v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 27.09.2022 - 18339/19

  OTITE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 01.02.2022 - 27801/19

  JOHANSEN v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 19.03.2026 - 15860/22

  HUSSAIN v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 31572/19

  HUSSAIN v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 54157/21

  KURLAND v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 21783/22

  CAKMAK v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 60766/19

  FATEH v. DENMARK and 1 other application
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 32739/21

  PAYAM v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 17803/20

  MAVRIC v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 61126/19

  BELGACEM v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 20579/20

  ABDULJI v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 01.02.2022 - 16588/20

  AHMED v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 25.01.2024 - 11093/22

  DAVUD KIBAR v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 56700/15

  SANCHES PINA v. PORTUGAL