Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GEÇGEL AND ÇELIK v. TURKEY

  (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 8747/02
• EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 8747/02, 34509/03

Wird zitiert von ... (10)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 20.04.2004 - 35070/97

  TEZCAN UZUNHASANOGLU v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 8747/02

  Finally, having regard to its finding of a violation of Article 6 § 1 in conjunction with Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention, the Court considers that it is unnecessary to examine a further complaint by the second applicant under Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention (Tezcan UzunhasanoÄŸlu v. Turkey, no. 35070/97, § 23, 20 April 2004).
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 8747/02

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 77845/01

  DERECI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 8747/02

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in cases raising similar issues to those in the present application (see, for example, Atıcı v. Turkey, no. 19735/02, 10 May 2007; Dereci v. Turkey, no. 77845/01, 24 May 2005).

• EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 28496/95

  E.K. c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 8747/02

  The Court reiterates that it has already examined and rejected this preliminary objection by the Government's in cases similar to the present application (see, E.K. v. Turkey (dec.), no. 28496/95, 28 November 2000 as regards the first objection, and Mahmut Aslan v. Turkey, no. 74507/01, § 15, 2 October 2007 as regards the second).
• EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 19735/02

  ATICI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 8747/02

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in cases raising similar issues to those in the present application (see, for example, Atıcı v. Turkey, no. 19735/02, 10 May 2007; Dereci v. Turkey, no. 77845/01, 24 May 2005).
• EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 74507/01

  MAHMUT ASLAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 8747/02

  The Court reiterates that it has already examined and rejected this preliminary objection by the Government's in cases similar to the present application (see, E.K. v. Turkey (dec.), no. 28496/95, 28 November 2000 as regards the first objection, and Mahmut Aslan v. Turkey, no. 74507/01, § 15, 2 October 2007 as regards the second).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 23.01.2018 - 15185/05

  ÇELIK v. TURKEY

  8747/02 and 34509/03, § 16, 13 October 2009).
• EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 72174/10

  YIGITDOGAN v. TURKEY

  Having regard to its findings above and referring to paragraph 73 below, the Court, without taking a position on the remaining complaints raised by the applicant regarding the fairness of the proceedings, considers that it is unnecessary to examine them (see Geçgel and Çelik v. Turkey, nos. 8747/02 and 34509/03, § 16, 13 October 2009, and Hikmet Yılmaz v. Turkey, no. 11022/05, § 24, 4 June 2013).
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 44767/06

  [FRE]

  Au vu de l'ensemble des éléments en sa possession, et à la lumière de ses conclusions aux paragraphes 24 et 30, 1a Cour considère, qu'il n'y a pas lieu d'examiner ni la recevabilité ni le fond de ceux-ci (Hikmet Yilmaz c. Turquie, no 11022/05, § 24, 4 juin 2013, Geçgel et Çelik c. Turquie, nos 8747/02 et 34509/03, § 16, 13 octobre 2009).

• EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 21163/08

  [FRE]

  8747/02 and 34509/03, § 16, 13 October 2009; and Türk v. Turkey, no. 22744/07, §§ 60-61, 5 September 2017).
• EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 24820/05

  FAZLI KAYA v. TURKEY

  Having regard to its finding above and referring to paragraph 31 below, the Court, without taking a position on the remaining complaint raised by the applicant regarding the fairness of the proceedings, considers that it is unnecessary to examine it (see Geçgel and Çelik v. Turkey, nos. 8747/02 and 34509/03, § 16, 13 October 2009, Tezcan UzunhasanoÄŸlu v. Turkey, no. 35070/97, § 23, 20 April 2004).
• EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 11022/05

  [ENG]

  Having regard to its finding above and referring to paragraph 28 below, the Court, without taking a position on the remaining complaints raised by the applicant regarding the fairness of the proceedings, considers that it is unnecessary to examine them (see Geçgel and Çelik v. Turkey, nos. 8747/02 and 34509/03, § 16, 13 October 2009, Tezcan UzunhasanoÄŸlu v. Turkey, no. 35070/97, § 23, 20 April 2004).
• EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 23501/07

  [FRE]

  Quant aux autres griefs, tels qu'ils ont été présentés par le requérant, au vu de l'ensemble des éléments en sa possession et à la lumière de ses conclusions aux paragraphes 25 et 34, 1a Cour considère qu'il n'y a pas lieu d'en examiner ni la recevabilité ni le fond (Yılmaz Demir c. Turquie, no 44767/06, § 25, 15 octobre 2013, Hikmet Yılmaz c. Turquie, no 11022/05, § 24, 4 juin 2013, et Geçgel et Çelik c. Turquie, nos 8747/02 et 34509/03, § 16, 13 octobre 2009).
• EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 31535/04

  [ENG]

  Having regard to its findings above and referring to paragraph 36 below, the Court, without taking a position on the remaining complaint raised by the applicant regarding the fairness of the proceedings, considers that it is unnecessary to examine it (see Geçgel and Çelik v. Turkey, nos. 8747/02 and 34509/03, § 16, 13 October 2009; Hikmet Yılmaz v. Turkey, no. 11022/05, § 24, 4 June 2013; and Fazlı Kaya v. Turkey, no. 24820/05, § 27, 17 September 2013).
• EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 29724/08

  [ENG]

  The reopening of the proceedings, as being the most appropriate form of redress, would allow the clarification of all these circumstances (see Geçgel and Çelik v. Turkey, nos. 8747/02 and 34509/03, § 16, 13 October 2009, and Tezcan UzunhasanoÄŸlu v. Turkey, no. 35070/97, § 23, 20 April 2004).
• EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 3042/05

  [ENG]

  Having regard to its finding above and referring to paragraph 26 below, the Court, without taking a position on the remaining complaints raised by the applicant regarding the fairness of the proceedings, considers that it is unnecessary to examine them (see Geçgel and Çelik v. Turkey, nos. 8747/02 and 34509/03, § 16, 13 October 2009, and Tezcan UzunhasanoÄŸlu v. Turkey, no. 35070/97, § 23, 20 April 2004).