Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 13 MRK
No violation of Art. 6 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 13 MRK
Non-violation de l'art. 6 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 13 (französisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 09.01.1991 - 13071/87
- EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87
Papierfundstellen
- Serie A Nr. 247-B
Wird zitiert von ... (345) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 26.03.1982 - 8269/78
Adolf ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87
La Cour conclut donc que l'instance d'appel a corrigé les déficiences du procès initial (voir, à cet égard, l'arrêt Adolf c. Autriche du 26 mars 1982, série A no 49, pp. 17-18, paras. 38-41, et, mutatis mutandis, l'arrêt De Cubber c. Belgique du 26 octobre 1984, série A no 86, p. 19, par. 33). - EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80
DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87
La Cour conclut donc que l'instance d'appel a corrigé les déficiences du procès initial (voir, à cet égard, l'arrêt Adolf c. Autriche du 26 mars 1982, série A no 49, pp. 17-18, paras. 38-41, et, mutatis mutandis, l'arrêt De Cubber c. Belgique du 26 octobre 1984, série A no 86, p. 19, par. 33). - EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87
La tâche de la Cour consiste à rechercher si la procédure litigieuse, envisagée en bloc, revêtit un caractère équitable, notamment quant au mode d'administration des preuves (voir, entre autres, l'arrêt Vidal c. Belgique du 22 avril 1992, série A no 235-B, pp. 32-33, par. 33). - EGMR, 12.10.1992 - 14104/88
T. c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87
La Cour rappelle que les exigences du paragraphe 3 de l'article 6 (art. 6-3) représentent des aspects particuliers du droit à un procès équitable, garanti par le paragraphe 1 (art. 6-1) (voir, en dernier lieu, l'arrêt T. c. Italie du 12 octobre 1992, série A no 245-C, p. 41, par. 25).
- EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 61496/08
Überwachung privater Chatnachrichten des Arbeitnehmers durch den Arbeitgeber
Where domestic proceedings have taken place, it is not the Court's task to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and it is for the latter to establish the facts on the basis of the evidence before them (see, among other authorities, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 34, Series A no. 247-B). - EuGH, 15.10.2002 - C-238/99
Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij (LVM) / Kommission
DSM hat geltend gemacht, durch das beanstandete Verhalten sei auch gegen Artikel 6 EMRK verstoßen worden, der zwar keine speziellen Vorschriften über die Erlangung und Verwendung von Beweismitteln enthalte, aber nicht an der Prüfung hindere, ob ein Verfahren als Ganzes einschließlich der Art und Weise der Beweiserhebung fair abgelaufen sei (EGMR, Urteile Kostovski vom 20. November 1989, Serie A Nr. 166, § 39, Vidal vom 22. April 1992, Serie A Nr. 235 B, § 33, und Edwards vom 16. Dezember 1992, Serie A Nr. 247 B, § 34). - EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06
Chodorkowski: Moskauer Prozesse sind unfair
The Court reiterates in this respect that, in determining issues of fairness of proceedings for the purposes of Article 6 of the Convention, it must consider the proceedings as a whole, including the decision of the appellate court (see, for example, the Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 34, Series A no. 247-B).
- EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 44787/98
P.G. AND J.H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
En outre, l'article 6 § 1 contient l'obligation - le droit anglais le reconnaît du reste (paragraphe 30 ci-dessus) - pour les autorités de poursuite de communiquer à la défense tous les éléments importants, à charge ou à décharge (arrêt Edwards c. Royaume-Uni, 16 décembre 1992, série A no 247-B, p. 35, § 36). - EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05
KUDREVICIUS ET AUTRES c. LITUANIE
It is not normally within the province of the European Court to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for these courts to assess the evidence before them (see, inter alia, Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 34, Series A no. 247-B; Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, §§ 33-34, Series A no. 235-B; and Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, § 29, Series A no. 269). - EGMR, 25.07.2019 - 1586/15
ROOK v. GERMANY
Ganz abgesehen von der Gelegenheit, Kenntnis von den Stellungnahmen und Beweismitteln der Gegenseite zu nehmen und sich dazu zu äußern (vgl. Rdnrn. 56 bis 57;… vgl. auch Rowe und Davis./. Vereinigtes Königreich [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 28901/95, Rdnr. 60, ECHR 2000-II), erfordert das Recht auf ein kontradiktorisches Verfahren in einer Strafsache auch, dass die Strafverfolgungsbehörden der Verteidigung gegenüber sämtliche in ihrem Besitz befindliche maßgebliche Beweismittel ("material evidence"), die für oder gegen die beschuldigte Person sprechen, offenlegen (siehe Edwards./. Vereinigtes Königreich, 16. Dezember 1992, Rdnr. 36, Serie A Bd. 247-B, und Rowe und Davis, a.a.O., Rdnr. 60). - EGMR, 24.06.2003 - 39482/98
Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (rechtliches Gehör; Waffengleichheit; …
The Government submitted that the proceedings taken as a whole were fair and in accordance with Article 6 § 1. They contended, relying inter alia on Edwards v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B), that the prosecution's failure at first instance to disclose the actions and messages held on the Holmes Computer System and the materials gathered during the fraud inquiry did not deprive the applicant of a fair trial because this material was disclosed in time for the hearing in the Court of Appeal.The Court went on in the following paragraph to distinguish the case of Edwards v. the United Kingdom (judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B) on the grounds that at the appeal stage in that case the defence had received most of the information which had been missing at trial and the Court of Appeal was able to consider the impact of the new material on the safety of the conviction in the light of detailed and informed argument from the defence.
- EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89
KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE
It is further recalled that it is not normally within the province of the European Court to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for these courts to assess the evidence before them (see, inter alia, the Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, p. 12, para. 34, and the Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, paras. 33-34)."... it is not normally within the province of the European Court to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts and, as a general rule, it is for these courts to assess the evidence before them (see, inter alia, the Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, p. 12, para. 34, and the Vidal v. B778elgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, paras. 33-34).".
- EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 28901/95
ROWE AND DAVIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
La Cour rappelle que les exigences du paragraphe 3 de l'article 6 représentent des aspects particuliers du droit à un procès équitable garanti par le paragraphe 1 (arrêt Edwards c. Royaume-Uni du 16 décembre 1992, série A no 247-B, p. 34, § 33). - EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89
SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE
It considers, however, that the Federal Insurance Court remedied this shortcoming by requesting the Board to make all the documents available to the applicant - who was able, among other things, to make copies - and then forwarding the file to the applicant's lawyer (see, as the most recent authority, mutatis mutandis, the Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, paras. 34-39). - EGMR, 24.03.2011 - 23458/02
Tod eines Demonstranten beim G-8-Gipfel in Genua
- EGMR, 14.11.2000 - 35115/97
RIEPAN v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 23.02.1994 - 16757/90
STANFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91
TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 26.09.2023 - 15669/20
YÜKSEL YALÇINKAYA v. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 35289/11
REGNER c. RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE
- EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 16281/10
AYDAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.11.2010 - 926/05
TAXQUET v. BELGIUM
- EGMR, 06.09.2005 - 65518/01
SALOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 06.01.2010 - 74181/01
VERA FERNANDEZ-HUIDOBRO c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 24.04.2007 - 40412/98
V. v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 29777/96
FITT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 25.05.1993 - 14553/89
BRANNIGAN ET McBRIDE c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 27.03.2014 - 58428/10
MATYTSINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.01.2002 - 64050/00
BARRIOS GARCIA contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 22.06.1999 - 39943/98
BONAPART v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EKMR, 17.01.1997 - 29335/95
CANNON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 1049/17
NIKA v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 61503/14
J.M. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 35485/05
HUSEYN AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EKMR, 21.10.1998 - 36986/97
DU BOIS v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 28743/03
MELNITCHOUK c. UKRAINE
- EuGH, 15.10.2002 - C-251/99
Enichem / Kommission
- EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 45291/06
PREVITI c. ITALIE
- Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 25.10.2001 - C-244/99
DSM und DSM Kunststoffen / Kommission
- EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 15319/09
HANSEN v. NORWAY
- EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 19955/05
GRAYSON AND BARNHAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 02.05.2000 - 35718/97
CONDRON c. ROYAUME-UNI
- EGMR, 18.01.2000 - 27618/95
PESTI AND FRODL v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 26.04.2007 - 71525/01
DUMITRU POPESCU c. ROUMANIE (N° 2)
- EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 39846/98
BRENNAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 22.07.2014 - 50275/08
ATAYKAYA c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 20496/02
SILICKIENE v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 6293/04
MIRILASHVILI v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 26986/03
GALSTYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2006 - 65859/01
SHEYDAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 26260/02
GOLUBEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.03.2005 - 60861/00
MANOILESCU AND DOBRESCU v. ROMANIA AND RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.11.2014 - 50388/06
ELINÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 68939/12
CEROVSEK AND BOZICNIK v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 14974/09
GRAMADA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 28.04.2009 - 38886/05
RASMUSSEN v. POLAND
- EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 27052/95
JASPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 22574/08
KASHLEV v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 17.07.2012 - 14337/04
RADU POP v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 19.10.2006 - 65550/01
KOVAL v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 72000/01
GÖÇMEN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 26937/04
TRESKA c. ALBANIE ET ITALIE
- EGMR, 19.09.2023 - 64144/14
COSTA SANTOS c. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 4904/20
AL c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 49756/09
YÜKSEL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 01.03.2011 - 15924/05
WELKE AND BIALEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 44023/02
CAKA v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 839/02
MASLOVA AND NALBANDOV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 19.06.2003 - 28490/95
HULKI GÜNES v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 24.10.2017 - 24016/05
EKER c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 6684/05
MCKEOWN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 30251/03
ROMAN KARASEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 1883/03
VAQUERO HERNANDEZ ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 24.04.2007 - 38184/03
MATYJEK c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 44069/98
G.B. v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 23.04.1998 - 22885/93
BERNARD v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 19.02.1996 - 16206/90
BOTTEN v. NORWAY
- EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 9390/05
ALEKSANDRA DMITRIYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.11.2007 - 30779/04
PATSURIA v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 28.02.2006 - 51277/99
Konfrontationsrecht (Verwertungsverbot hinsichtlich einer entscheidenden …
- EGMR, 06.09.2005 - 61406/00
GUREPKA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 02.03.1999 - 32492/96
COEME ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 20.09.1993 - 14647/89
SAÏDI v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 59173/08
URFANI YILDIZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 12951/11
VEITS v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 22965/10
YURTSEVER ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 25.02.2014 - 651/10
MAKBULE KAYMAZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 25330/07
JOKSAS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 41130/06
KELLY v. IRELAND
- EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 21022/04
NATUNEN v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 15.01.2008 - 37469/05
LUBOCH v. POLAND
- EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 46503/99
KLIMENTYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 45801/19
TUNÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.12.2019 - 46435/09
MAKEYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 14.06.2016 - 61808/08
GÜVENER c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.06.2013 - 22875/02
ROMENSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 5605/04
KARPENKO v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 59577/08
LEAS v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 45140/05
BAYAV v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 30.06.2011 - 25041/07
MESSIER c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 28924/04
CHUYKINA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 26.01.2010 - 36822/06
EBANKS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 03.09.2009 - 56305/08
GETOS-MAGDIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 20292/04
ANANYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.08.2006 - 16469/05
OVLISEN v. DENMARK
- EGMR, 31.03.2005 - 10508/02
GJONBOCARI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 58263/00
TIMOFEYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.09.2000 - 29522/95
I.J.L., G.M.R. AND A.K.P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 22.11.2022 - 74017/17
MARTINS PEREIRA PENEDOS c. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 47711/19
KUTSAROVI c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 17.12.2019 - 44240/12
YAKOVLEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.01.2018 - 59040/08
OKTAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 39966/09
GILLISSEN v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 30582/04
KARPYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 30942/04
MIHAYLOVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 29474/09
TAUTKUS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 35389/04
NITSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.08.2011 - 5598/03
LISICHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 16.09.2010 - 75472/01
TIGRAN AYRAPETYAN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.03.2010 - 18299/03
FINOGENOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.03.2010 - 20808/02
SHALIMOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 2638/05
PETRU ROSCA v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 54091/08
PERVUSHIN AND OTHERS v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 15737/02
ÖNGÜN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 25.11.2008 - 1767/03
DAGDELEN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 10309/03
ARAT v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 20817/04
NART v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.08.2006 - 7352/03
BESHIRI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 1414/03
MARES c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 14.06.2005 - 34044/02
DEPALLE c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 14.06.2005 - 34078/02
BROSSET TRIBOULET ET AUTRE c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 7508/02
L.L. c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 11.05.2004 - 74587/01
LACAS contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 18.03.2003 - 61139/00
LE DUIGOU contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 30.01.2003 - 57836/00
MELLORS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 42297/98
McMULLEN v. IRELAND
- EGMR, 30.04.2002 - 34090/96
W.B. v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2001 - 61133/00
LOPEZ SOLE Y MARTIN DE VARGAS contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 04.12.2001 - 59072/00
GONZALEZ DORIA DURAN DE QUIROGA contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 50720/99
ALVAREZ SANCHEZ contre l'ESPAGNE
- EKMR, 21.05.1997 - 24530/94
VODENICAROV v. THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 39979/08
TSAREV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.03.2017 - 16980/06
PALCHIK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 40/14
AUSTIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 09.06.2016 - 2308/06
SARANCHOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 19.05.2016 - 42684/06
UMNIKOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 02.06.2015 - 44103/05
NEDYALKOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 30.09.2014 - 50135/12
KOVÁCS v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 34783/06
IZET HAXHIA v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 696/10
EKICI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 15499/10
BEGGS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 04.09.2012 - 13567/08
YAVUZKAPLAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 38623/05
PLOTNICOVA v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 42799/05
SOLOMON v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 26866/05
SHKALLA v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 18061/08
ALMEIDA E VASCONCELOS DE MELO c. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 2573/03
HACIOGLU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 29.06.2010 - 12976/05
KARADAG c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 29512/08
TELEVANTOU v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 29517/08
CONSTANTINOU v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 28439/03
HAKAN DUMAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 25083/05
MAMIKONYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 31792/06
EVCIMEN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 28961/03
KOLCHINAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 37363/05
YURTSEVER AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 20.10.2009 - 18308/02
DIKICI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 30282/06
CHRISTODOULOU v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 30.06.2009 - 17064/06
SHUB v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 34030/07
JALOWIECKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 16.12.2008 - 23510/02
VITRENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 18.11.2008 - 1991/04
GUNES v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 25.03.2008 - 3460/03
SHEIDL v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 66446/01
GÖKTAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 11.09.2007 - 39656/03
ERDOGAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 30.08.2007 - 30461/02
CAGLAYAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 56891/00
BORISOVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 77361/01
DILDAR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 35698/03
TENGERAKIS v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 23.10.2006 - 9457/03
BACA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 15071/03
UCMA v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 31.08.2006 - 42086/02
YURTSEVER v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 7198/04
IOSUB CARAS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 46213/99
ÖRS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.01.2006 - 8036/02
SAGAT AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 8768/03
ZOUHAR c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 51796/99
SPASOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 25.08.2005 - 431/04
ARANDA SERRANO c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 23.06.2005 - 38261/03
PAPALIA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 28.10.2004 - 47153/99
VANPRAET c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 07.10.2004 - 76809/01
BAUMANN v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 14.09.2004 - 32447/02
PIRINEN v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 59028/00
STANCA contre la ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 46825/99
CLAES, COËME, DASSAULT, PUELINCKX, WALLYN, HERMANUS et DELANGHE contre la …
- EGMR, 04.11.2003 - 31548/02
BELLERIN LAGARES c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 24.06.2003 - 61178/00
GAUTHIER contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 20.05.2003 - 32456/96
DINDAR contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 68416/01
STEEL and MORRIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 46170/99
ZIROVNICKY contre la REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 63486/00
POSOKHOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.06.2002 - 45689/99
VAUGHAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 14.05.2002 - 39482/98
DOWSETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 30.04.2002 - 58116/00
PFLEGER contre la REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 16.04.2002 - 64935/01
CHMELIR contre la REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 16.04.2002 - 63250/00
VAQUE RAFART contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 05.03.2002 - 61281/00
MENDEZ GUTIERREZ et PINDADO MARTINEZ contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 19.02.2002 - 65892/01
RAMOS RUIZ contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 18.09.2001 - 49104/99
PUELINCKX contre la BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 21.06.2001 - 45132/98
GAUDER v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 15.03.2001 - 48629/99
ARANITI contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.06.2000 - 45441/99
PULLICINO v. MALTA
- EGMR, 06.01.2000 - 42916/98
TORRENTS BAUZA, BORRALLO RUBIO, BALTIERREZ ALTIER ET PRATS SANROMA contre …
- EKMR, 15.09.1997 - 27052/95
JASPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 15.09.1997 - 29777/96
FITT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 27.02.1995 - 23229/94
H.H. v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 66355/11
SEVASTYANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.01.2018 - 6427/05
GASANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 13039/11
KOLOSOV v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 39813/04
AKYÜZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 34564/06
ÖZTAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.04.2014 - 28334/08
R.E. c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 60449/08
ÖZER v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 59651/13
DORCA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 19.11.2013 - 60375/11
ASLAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 37768/08
BEZNEA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 53337/11
AYDIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 44977/09
KISLYAK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 33872/05
STEPANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 15651/08
OZAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 39105/09
KARAKASOGLU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 7039/04
CHERKASOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.06.2011 - 30754/03
KLOUVI c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 50399/07
GORNY v. POLAND
- EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 32456/04
KOPECKÝ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 28680/06
A.D. AND O.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 21.01.2010 - 35064/04
TYURIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 28552/05
JANATUINEN v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 27577/04
SENTÜRK v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 7618/07
MINHAS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 28.07.2009 - 74307/01
GÖK AND GÜLER v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 8883/02
KIRICHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 25.11.2008 - 31338/04
BOYARCHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 18.11.2008 - 17857/03
NEATA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 30698/04
VAVRENYUK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 39453/02
TARASYUK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 39084/02
VOVK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 37294/04
HAYES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 5197/03
DEMIR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 68761/01
BOBEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 15187/03
BOTMEH AND ALAMI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 33675/02
SEVER AND ASLAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.11.2006 - 57656/00
PORYAZOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 70786/01
ROSENGREN v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 17.01.2006 - 74831/01
TRUSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 12710/04
BETSON AND COCKRAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 4591/04
GUNNARSSON v. ICELAND
- EGMR, 13.10.2005 - 20131/02
KUPPAR c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 65167/01
PRONINA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 16.06.2005 - 35450/02
ARVANITIS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 12141/04
LATIMER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 71047/01
BERKOUCHE c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 21581/02
SKONDRIANOU c. GRECE
- EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 59457/00
RAJCOOMAR v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 31.08.2004 - 410/02
JOHANS v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 23.03.2004 - 41588/98
CAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 10.02.2004 - 18905/02
CARNDUFF v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 27.01.2004 - 44484/98
LORSE v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 18.11.2003 - 54109/00
CHADWICK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 30.09.2003 - 77245/01
AVIA FERRER contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 02.09.2003 - 14180/03
RANSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 08.07.2003 - 43791/98
NOVÁK c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 20.05.2003 - 74208/01
RIEKWEL v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 04.03.2003 - 28231/02
DENTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 21.01.2003 - 4491/02
NOYE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 07.11.2002 - 74760/01
GIORDANO et TARANTINO contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 27.10.2002 - 35361/02
AKGÜN contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 08.10.2002 - 44305/98
SNOOKS and DOWSE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 12.09.2002 - 42585/98
INTIBA contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 44696/98
MUJEA contre la ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 24541/94
WIERZBICKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.01.2002 - 43467/98
TURQUIN c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 19.12.2001 - 43373/98
C.G. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 11.10.2001 - 58916/00
J.M. P.U. contre ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 20.09.2001 - 53610/99
VAZQUEZ BARRENO contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 21.11.2000 - 34547/97
KASPERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 14.09.2000 - 48729/99
NVONO ECORO contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 43286/98
ECHEVERRI RODRIGUEZ v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 16.05.2000 - 40042/98
GEORGIOU v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 46253/99
UBACH MORTES v. ANDORRA
- EGMR, 23.03.2000 - 45249/99
CONDE CONDE contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 16.03.2000 - 51760/99
CAMILLERI v. MALTA
- EGMR, 10.02.2000 - 45238/99
PEROTE PELLON contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 46290/99
A.J.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 05.10.1999 - 45253/99
FOLLA GOMEZ contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 24.08.1999 - 42186/98
OMAR v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 12.07.1999 - 27665/95
LANTTO v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 01.06.1999 - 41777/98
R.K. contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 01.06.1999 - 43828/98
KANGASNIEMI v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 11.05.1999 - 39661/98
A.J. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 09.03.1999 - 33399/96
KOSTU contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 02.03.1999 - 41539/98
NUNEZ VILLANUEVA contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 12.01.1999 - 40379/98
LAGO GARCIA ET OUBINA PINEIRO contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 15.12.1998 - 40180/98
A.E.D.L.G. contre l'ESPAGNE
- EKMR, 15.09.1997 - 38901/95
ROWE AND DAVIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 11.09.1997 - 32874/96
MOORE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 09.04.1997 - 27837/95
KINGSTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 09.04.1997 - 29522/95
I.J.L., G.M.R. AND A.K.P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 17.01.1997 - 30539/96
SMITH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 29424/95
REES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 24399/94
MENNIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 15.01.1996 - 25982/94
FLANDERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EKMR, 05.07.1994 - 21921/93
R.A.G. v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 12.11.2019 - 20391/16
MURRAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 18428/10
KRSTIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 31777/05
O'FARRELL AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 30542/04
D. v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 32671/02
SKORIK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 27740/03
SEVK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.05.2006 - 8035/05
PINEIRO NOGUEIRA c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 40412/98
V. v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 17.01.2006 - 45830/99
JUHA NUUTINEN v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 03.02.2005 - 19247/02
FEHR v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 02.12.2004 - 32219/02
MILAN c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 03.09.2002 - 43185/98
PRICE and LOWE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 11.04.2001 - 43373/98
C.G. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 31.08.1999 - 35253/97
VERDAM v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 38759/12
YOUNG v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 47720/08
DURMAZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 25745/07
AYDOGDU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 34865/07
STICHTING VOOR EDUCATIE EN BEROEPSONDERWIJS ZADKINE v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 14198/02
TATENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 04.09.2006 - 942/05
MONEDERO MARTIN c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 10.05.2005 - 19354/02
THOMAS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 21.01.2003 - 60590/00
MANSELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 03.12.2002 - 78023/01
SALA I GRISO contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 23.04.2002 - 48040/99
ZHELEZOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 29.11.2001 - 42246/98
JOHNSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 42965/98
BERISHA v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 43550/98
MATO JARA contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 13.01.2000 - 45138/98
GEORGIOU v. GREECE
- EGMR, 14.09.1999 - 32523/96
HILDEN v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 06.07.1999 - 30550/96
O'KANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 12.01.1999 - 36686/97
S.E. contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.12.1998 - 43472/98
FERRARI contre l'ITALIE
- EKMR, 21.10.1998 - 38061/97
CAVLUN v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EKMR, 09.09.1998 - 33995/96
MAMBRO AND FIORAVANTI v. ITALY
- EKMR, 22.10.1997 - 26304/95
LINDQVIST v. SWEDEN
- EKMR, 09.04.1997 - 30551/96
CARTLEDGE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 27.11.1996 - 24238/94
PIAZZI v. ITALY
- EKMR, 06.04.1995 - 24774/94
A.K. v. THE NETHERLANDS