Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ARSENIC v. SLOVENIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 34, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 22174/02

  The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 22174/02

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the cases and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the cases, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• OLG Hamburg, 18.01.2010 - 13 W 28/09

  Grundbucheintragung bei Zuerwerb von Wohnungseigentum: Nachverpfändung von …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 22174/02

  29/09/2006.
• EGMR, 31.03.1992 - 18020/91

  X c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 22174/02

  The Court recalls that in various cases where an applicant died in the course of the proceedings it has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or of close members of his family who expressed the wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see, for example, the X. v. France judgment of 31 March 1992, Series A no. 234-C, p. 89, § 26).
• EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 42320/98

  BELINGER v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 22174/02

  The Court notes that the present applications are similar to the cases of Belinger and Lukenda (Belinger v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 42320/98, 2 October 2001, and Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, 6 October 2005).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 23032/02

  LUKENDA AND 263 OTHER CASES AGAINST SLOVENIA

  22174/02.
• EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 2694/08

  REYNOLDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The Court considers that the conditions for striking the case out of its list of pending cases, as defined in Article 37 § 1 of the Convention, are not met and that it must accordingly continue to examine the application at Ms King's request (Arsenic v. Slovenia (nos. 22174/02 and 23666/02, §§ 17-19, 29 June 2006).
• EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 30946/02

  MLAKAR v. SLOVENIA

  Likewise, in Arsenic v. Slovenia, the applicant died in the course of the proceedings before domestic courts and the Court and was substituted by his heirs (see Arsenic v. Slovenia, nos. 22174/02 and 23666/02, §§ 15/19, 29 June 2006).
• EGMR, 23.11.2006 - 9296/02

  ZAGAR v. SLOVENIA

  The Court recalls that in various cases where an applicant died in the course of the proceedings it has taken into account the statements of the applicant's heirs or of close members of his family who expressed the wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see, for example, the X. v. France judgment of 31 March 1992, Series A no. 234-C, p. 89, § 26, and Arsenic v. Slovenia, nos. 22174/02 and 23666/02, §§ 15-19, 29 June 2006).
• EGMR, 08.12.2011 - 37868/06

  T.H. v. IRELAND

  The Court recalls its judgment in Arsenic v. Slovenia (nos. 22174/02 and 23666/02, §§ 17-19, 29 June 2006) and finds nothing in the Government's observations which would indicate that the conditions for striking the case out from its list of pending cases, as defined in Article 37 § 1 of the Convention, are met.