Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ÖZALP AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 2 with regard to death Violation of Art. 2 with regard to effectiveness of investigation No violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 Violation of Art. 13 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 31.08.2000 - 32457/96
• EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 32457/96

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 32457/96

  The fact remains, nonetheless, that the applicants did necessarily incur costs for the work done by their lawyer to represent them in both the written and oral proceedings before the Court (see, mutatis mutandis, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 210, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 32457/96

  The Court would also observe that serious doubts arise as to the ability of the administrative authorities concerned to carry out an independent investigation, as required by Article 2 of the Convention, having regard to their nature and composition (see Oğur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 91, ECHR 1999-III, and Güleç v. Turkey, judgment of 27 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV, pp.
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 32457/96

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII).

• EGMR, 13.06.1994 - 10588/83

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 32457/96

  The Court recalls that there must be a casual connection between the damage alleged by the applicants and violation of the Convention and that this may, if appropriate, include compensation in respect of loss of earnings (see amongst other authorities, Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain (Article 50), judgment of 13 June 1994, Series A no. 285-C, pp.
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 32457/96

  The applicants' complaints in this regard are therefore "arguable" for the purposes of Article 13 (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52, and Kaya, cited above, § 107).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

  TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 32457/96

  The Court reiterates that the obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 of the Convention to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force (see Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 101, ECHR 1999-IV).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR - 27913/21 (anhängig)

  ZIL v. TÜRKIYE and 3 other applications

  - Did the public prosecutor from the office for investigating offences allegedly committed by civil servants (Memur Suçları Soruşturma Bürosu), attached to the Istanbul public prosecutor's office, duly collect and assess all the relevant evidence, including the testimonies of eyewitnesses, within the scope of the criminal investigation (see Özalp and Others v. Turkey, no. 32457/96, §§ 42-47, 8 April 2004; and İkincisoy v. Turkey, no. 26144/95, §§ 76-78, 27 July 2004)?.