Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VERSACI v. ITALY
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- beck-aktuell.de (Kurzinformation)
Was der König unter "zuverlässig" verstand, kostet italienischen Buchmacher die Lizenz
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
VERSACI v. ITALY
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (4) Zitiert selbst (20)
- EuGH, 08.09.2009 - C-42/07
Beschränkung der Dienstleistungsfreiheit durch Internetglücksspiel-Verbote
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
[2] CJEU, judgment of 8 September 2009, Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional and Bwin International, C-42/07, EU:C:2009:519, § 57, with further references; see also, e.g., the CJEU's judgments of 8 September 2010, Carmen Media Group, C-46/08, EU:C:2010:505, § 59, and 28 February 2018, Sporting Odds Ltd, C-3/17, EU:C:2018:130, §§ 20-21. - EuGH, 08.09.2010 - C-46/08
Carmen Media Group - Art. 49 EG - Freier Dienstleistungsverkehr - Inhaber einer …
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
[2] CJEU, judgment of 8 September 2009, Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional and Bwin International, C-42/07, EU:C:2009:519, § 57, with further references; see also, e.g., the CJEU's judgments of 8 September 2010, Carmen Media Group, C-46/08, EU:C:2010:505, § 59, and 28 February 2018, Sporting Odds Ltd, C-3/17, EU:C:2018:130, §§ 20-21. - EuGH, 28.02.2018 - C-3/17
Die ungarischen Rechtsvorschriften über die Erteilung von Konzessionen zum …
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
[2] CJEU, judgment of 8 September 2009, Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional and Bwin International, C-42/07, EU:C:2009:519, § 57, with further references; see also, e.g., the CJEU's judgments of 8 September 2010, Carmen Media Group, C-46/08, EU:C:2010:505, § 59, and 28 February 2018, Sporting Odds Ltd, C-3/17, EU:C:2018:130, §§ 20-21.
- EuGH, 12.09.2013 - C-660/11
Biasci u.a. - Niederlassungsfreiheit - Freier Dienstleistungsverkehr - Art. 43 EG …
- EuGH - C-8/12 (anhängig)
Rainone u.a.
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
[9] See, among other authorities, CJEU, judgment of 12 September 2013, Biasci and Others, Joined Cases C-660/11 and C-8/12, EU:C:2013:550, § 23. - EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 50805/14
NAUMENKO AND SIA RIX SHIPPING v. LATVIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
It is of fundamental importance that the national authorities state the reason for administrative acts affecting individual interests (see Giuliano Germano, cited above, § 132): it is for the national authorities to make the initial assessment of necessity, while the final evaluation as to whether the reasons cited for the interference are relevant and sufficient remains subject to review by the Court for conformity with the requirements of the Convention (see Ghailan and Others v. Spain, no. 36366/14, § 62, 23 March 2021, and Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, § 50, 23 June 2022). - EGMR, 23.03.2021 - 36366/14
GHAILAN AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
It is of fundamental importance that the national authorities state the reason for administrative acts affecting individual interests (see Giuliano Germano, cited above, § 132): it is for the national authorities to make the initial assessment of necessity, while the final evaluation as to whether the reasons cited for the interference are relevant and sufficient remains subject to review by the Court for conformity with the requirements of the Convention (see Ghailan and Others v. Spain, no. 36366/14, § 62, 23 March 2021, and Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, § 50, 23 June 2022). - EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 29790/14
GULIYEV AND SHEINA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
Moreover, the national authorities must apply standards which are in conformity with the principles embodied in the Convention and base their decisions on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts (see Guliyev and Sheina v. Russia, no. 29790/14, § 52, 17 April 2018). - EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 2478/15
Kein Grundrecht auf assistierten Suizid
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
2478/15 and 1787/15, § 90, 16 July 2015). - EGMR, 28.05.2020 - 29620/07
FARZALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
Rather, the applicant must actually have complained (expressly or in substance) about the violation of the Convention "right" in a manner which leaves no doubt that the same complaint that was subsequently submitted to the Court had indeed been raised at the domestic level (see Peacock v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 52335/12, § 38, 5 January 2016; Farzaliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 29620/07, § 55, 28 May 2020; Grosam v. the Czech Republic, cited above, § 90; and Fu Quan, s.r.o. v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 24827/14, §§ 145 and 172, 1 June 2023). - EGMR, 29.04.2025 - 63386/16
MANSOURI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 21.11.2013 - 16882/03
[ENG]
- EGMR, 27.06.2023 - 27094/20
BAYRAKTAR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.06.2023 - 10794/12
GERMANO v. ITALY
- EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 70489/17
BUTKEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 76730/12
BALLIKTA?ž BINGÖLLÜ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 52335/12
PEACOCK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 24.11.2020 - 75414/10
KURBAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 06.07.2023 - 54588/13
GULIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 77546/14
MAGOMADOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.06.2026 - 50181/22
C.P. v. SPAIN
It reiterates that the courts' role is precisely to dissipate remaining doubts as to interpretation (see Leyla Şahin, cited above, § 91; Sanchez, cited above, § 126; and Versaci v. Italy, no. 3795/22, § 112, 15 May 2025). - EGMR, 10.03.2026 - 32283/23
MANJANI v. ALBANIA
Rn. 49 In this connection, the Court reiterates the fundamental importance of the obligation to state the reason for administrative acts affecting individual interests (see, among recent authorities, Versaci v. Italy, no. 3795/22, § 141, 15 May 2025). - EGMR, 30.06.2026 - 20034/18
GIKAS v. GREECE
It follows that the impugned measure cannot be considered to have been grounded in considerations relating to his private life (compare Yokuşlu v. Türkiye, no. 489/24, § 61, 6 January 2026, and contrast Versaci v. Italy, no. 3795/22, § 84, 15 May 2025). - EGMR - 19668/19 (anhängig)
EREK v. TÜRKİYE
In the affirmative, has there been an interference with the applicant's right to respect for his private life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention on account of his demotion and transfer? Was that interference in accordance with the law and necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2 (see, mutatis mutandis, Versaci v. Italy, no. 3795/22, §§ 148 -158, 15 May 2025; Pişkin, cited above, §§ 201-229; Sodan v. Turkey, no. 18650/05, §§ 43-44, 2 February 2016; and Naidin v. Romania, no. 38162/07, § 54, 21 October 2014)?.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".