Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2025,10864
EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22 (https://dejure.org/2025,10864)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15.05.2025 - 3795/22 (https://dejure.org/2025,10864)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. Mai 2025 - 3795/22 (https://dejure.org/2025,10864)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2025,10864) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    VERSACI v. ITALY

    Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

  • beck-aktuell.de (Kurzinformation)

    Was der König unter "zuverlässig" verstand, kostet italienischen Buchmacher die Lizenz

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Zitiert selbst (20)

  • EuGH, 08.09.2009 - C-42/07

    Beschränkung der Dienstleistungsfreiheit durch Internetglücksspiel-Verbote

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
    [2] CJEU, judgment of 8 September 2009, Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional and Bwin International, C-42/07, EU:C:2009:519, § 57, with further references; see also, e.g., the CJEU's judgments of 8 September 2010, Carmen Media Group, C-46/08, EU:C:2010:505, § 59, and 28 February 2018, Sporting Odds Ltd, C-3/17, EU:C:2018:130, §§ 20-21.
  • EuGH, 08.09.2010 - C-46/08

    Carmen Media Group - Art. 49 EG - Freier Dienstleistungsverkehr - Inhaber einer …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
    [2] CJEU, judgment of 8 September 2009, Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional and Bwin International, C-42/07, EU:C:2009:519, § 57, with further references; see also, e.g., the CJEU's judgments of 8 September 2010, Carmen Media Group, C-46/08, EU:C:2010:505, § 59, and 28 February 2018, Sporting Odds Ltd, C-3/17, EU:C:2018:130, §§ 20-21.
  • EuGH, 28.02.2018 - C-3/17

    Die ungarischen Rechtsvorschriften über die Erteilung von Konzessionen zum …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
    [2] CJEU, judgment of 8 September 2009, Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional and Bwin International, C-42/07, EU:C:2009:519, § 57, with further references; see also, e.g., the CJEU's judgments of 8 September 2010, Carmen Media Group, C-46/08, EU:C:2010:505, § 59, and 28 February 2018, Sporting Odds Ltd, C-3/17, EU:C:2018:130, §§ 20-21.
  • EuGH, 12.09.2013 - C-660/11

    Biasci u.a. - Niederlassungsfreiheit - Freier Dienstleistungsverkehr - Art. 43 EG …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
    [9] See, among other authorities, CJEU, judgment of 12 September 2013, Biasci and Others, Joined Cases C-660/11 and C-8/12, EU:C:2013:550, § 23.
  • EuGH - C-8/12 (anhängig)

    Rainone u.a.

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
    [9] See, among other authorities, CJEU, judgment of 12 September 2013, Biasci and Others, Joined Cases C-660/11 and C-8/12, EU:C:2013:550, § 23.
  • EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 50805/14

    NAUMENKO AND SIA RIX SHIPPING v. LATVIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
    It is of fundamental importance that the national authorities state the reason for administrative acts affecting individual interests (see Giuliano Germano, cited above, § 132): it is for the national authorities to make the initial assessment of necessity, while the final evaluation as to whether the reasons cited for the interference are relevant and sufficient remains subject to review by the Court for conformity with the requirements of the Convention (see Ghailan and Others v. Spain, no. 36366/14, § 62, 23 March 2021, and Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, § 50, 23 June 2022).
  • EGMR, 23.03.2021 - 36366/14

    GHAILAN AND OTHERS v. SPAIN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
    It is of fundamental importance that the national authorities state the reason for administrative acts affecting individual interests (see Giuliano Germano, cited above, § 132): it is for the national authorities to make the initial assessment of necessity, while the final evaluation as to whether the reasons cited for the interference are relevant and sufficient remains subject to review by the Court for conformity with the requirements of the Convention (see Ghailan and Others v. Spain, no. 36366/14, § 62, 23 March 2021, and Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, § 50, 23 June 2022).
  • EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 29790/14

    GULIYEV AND SHEINA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
    Moreover, the national authorities must apply standards which are in conformity with the principles embodied in the Convention and base their decisions on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts (see Guliyev and Sheina v. Russia, no. 29790/14, § 52, 17 April 2018).
  • EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 2478/15

    Kein Grundrecht auf assistierten Suizid

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
    2478/15 and 1787/15, § 90, 16 July 2015).
  • EGMR, 28.05.2020 - 29620/07

    FARZALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22
    Rather, the applicant must actually have complained (expressly or in substance) about the violation of the Convention "right" in a manner which leaves no doubt that the same complaint that was subsequently submitted to the Court had indeed been raised at the domestic level (see Peacock v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 52335/12, § 38, 5 January 2016; Farzaliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 29620/07, § 55, 28 May 2020; Grosam v. the Czech Republic, cited above, § 90; and Fu Quan, s.r.o. v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 24827/14, §§ 145 and 172, 1 June 2023).
  • EGMR, 29.04.2025 - 63386/16

    MANSOURI c. ITALIE

  • EGMR, 21.11.2013 - 16882/03

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 27.06.2023 - 27094/20

    BAYRAKTAR v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 22.06.2023 - 10794/12

    GERMANO v. ITALY

  • EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 70489/17

    BUTKEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA

  • EGMR, 22.06.2021 - 76730/12

    BALLIKTA?ž BINGÖLLÜ v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 52335/12

    PEACOCK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 24.11.2020 - 75414/10

    KURBAN v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 06.07.2023 - 54588/13

    GULIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 77546/14

    MAGOMADOVA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 11.06.2026 - 50181/22

    C.P. v. SPAIN

    It reiterates that the courts' role is precisely to dissipate remaining doubts as to interpretation (see Leyla Şahin, cited above, § 91; Sanchez, cited above, § 126; and Versaci v. Italy, no. 3795/22, § 112, 15 May 2025).
  • EGMR, 10.03.2026 - 32283/23

    MANJANI v. ALBANIA

    Rn. 49 In this connection, the Court reiterates the fundamental importance of the obligation to state the reason for administrative acts affecting individual interests (see, among recent authorities, Versaci v. Italy, no. 3795/22, § 141, 15 May 2025).
  • EGMR, 30.06.2026 - 20034/18

    GIKAS v. GREECE

    It follows that the impugned measure cannot be considered to have been grounded in considerations relating to his private life (compare Yokuşlu v. Türkiye, no. 489/24, § 61, 6 January 2026, and contrast Versaci v. Italy, no. 3795/22, § 84, 15 May 2025).
  • EGMR - 19668/19 (anhängig)

    EREK v. TÜRKİYE

    In the affirmative, has there been an interference with the applicant's right to respect for his private life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention on account of his demotion and transfer? Was that interference in accordance with the law and necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2 (see, mutatis mutandis, Versaci v. Italy, no. 3795/22, §§ 148 -158, 15 May 2025; Pişkin, cited above, §§ 201-229; Sodan v. Turkey, no. 18650/05, §§ 43-44, 2 February 2016; and Naidin v. Romania, no. 38162/07, § 54, 21 October 2014)?.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht