Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  WEJRUP contre la DANEMARK

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 34 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  WEJRUP v. DENMARK

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 34 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (10)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2002 - 49126/99

  From a general point of view the reasonableness of the length of the proceedings must be assessed with reference to the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and that of the authorities before which the case was brought (cf. Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

  SCHENK c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2002 - 49126/99

  The Court refers, on this point, to the established case-law of the Convention organs (cf. Schenk v. Switzerland, judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 25, § 45).
• EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

  Eckle ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2002 - 49126/99

  However, this general rule is subject to an exception when the national authorities have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way the failure to observe the reasonable time requirement and have afforded redress by reducing the sentence in an express and measurable manner (see the Eckle v. Germany judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66 and Beck v. Norway, no. 26390/95, 26 June 2001, § 27).

• EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 54447/10

  MICHELIOUDAKIS c. GRÈCE

  Outre l'adoption d'un recours indemnitaire qui doit correspondre aux critères d'effectivité prévue par la jurisprudence (voir, en ce sens, Scordino (no 1), précité, §§ 194-206, et Bourdov (no 2), précité, § 99), la Cour relève qu'en cas de condamnation de l'intéressé, la réduction de la peine imposée en raison de la durée excessive d'une procédure pénale d'une manière expresse et mesurable peut aussi constituer une réparation satisfaisante à cet égard (voir, entre autres, Scordino c. Italie (no 1), précité, § 186 ; Malkov c. Estonie, no 31407/07, §§ 60-61, 4 février 2010 ; Freimanis et Lidums c. Lettonie, nos 73443/01 et 74860/01, § 68, 9 février 2006 ; Beck c. Norvège, no 26390/95, § 27, 26 juin 2001, Wejrup c. Danemark (déc.), no 49126/99, CEDH 2002-IV).
• EGMR, 09.02.2006 - 73443/01

  FREIMANIS ET LIDUMS c. LETTONIE

  Cette règle générale peut notamment souffrir une exception lorsque les autorités nationales ont reconnu de façon suffisamment explicite le non-respect de l'exigence du délai raisonnable et ont accordé une réparation en réduisant la peine d'une manière expresse et mesurable (voir Beck c. Norvège, no 26390/95, § 27, 26 juin 2001, Wejrup c. Danemark (déc.), no 49126/99, CEDH 2002-IV, et Morby c. Luxembourg (déc.), no 27156/02, CEDH 2003-XI).
• EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 32848/06

  MOESGAARD PETERSEN v. DENMARK

  The Court reiterates that the scale and complexity of a criminal case concerning fraud, which is often compounded further by the involvement of several suspects, may justify the extensive length of proceedings (see, among other authorities, C.P. and Others v. France, no. 36009/97, § 30, 1 August 2000; Hozee v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, p. 1102, § 52; Wejrup v. Denmark (dec.), no. 49126/99, ECHR 2002-IV, Petersen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 6315/02, 13 May 2004; and Frederiksen v. Denmark (dec.), 23012/02, 16 September 2004).

 
• EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 42585/98

  INTIBA c. TURQUIE

  Dès lors, aux fins de l'article 6 de la Convention, l'affaire revêtait sans aucun doute un caractère complexe (Wejrup c. Danemark (déc.), no 49126/99, CEDH 2002-IV) et le nombre d'accusés qui s'élevait à douze n'aurait pu qu'accentuer cette complexité (voir dans le même sens, Eckle, précité, § 89 ; Lacour c. France (déc.), no 32026/96, 10 septembre 1997).
• EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 36244/06

  HASSLUND v. DENMARK

  The Court reiterates that the scale and complexity of a criminal case concerning fraud, which is often compounded further by the involvement of several suspects, may justify the extensive length of proceedings (see, among other authorities, C.P. and Others v. France, no. 36009/97, § 30, 1 August 2000; Hozee v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, p. 1102, § 52; Wejrup v. Denmark (dec.), no. 49126/99, ECHR 2002-IV, Petersen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 6315/02, 13 May 2004; and Frederiksen v. Denmark (dec.), 23012/02, 16 September 2004).
• EGMR, 16.09.2004 - 23012/02

  FREDERIKSEN v. DENMARK

  The Court reiterates that the scale and complexity of a criminal case concerning fraud, which is often compounded further by the involvement of several suspects, may justify the extensive length of proceedings (see, among other authorities, C.P. and Others v. France, no. 36009/97, § 30, 1 August 2000; Hozee v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, p. 1102, § 52; Wejrup v. Denmark (dec.), no. 49126/99, ECHR 2002-IV, and Petersen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 6315/02, 13 May 2004).
• EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 23523/05

  FISMANAS AND GRIFLIT LTD. v. LITHUANIA

  It should also be noted that according to the Court's case-law, in certain circumstances length of proceedings exceeding five or six years can still be considered as not excessive (see Ivashchenko v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 23728/03, 24 March 2009; Wejrup v. Denmark (dec.), no. 49126/99, ECHR 2002-IV).
• EGMR, 01.02.2005 - 23523/02

  WALLIN KARLSEN v. DENMARK

  The Court reiterates that the scale and complexity of a criminal case concerning fraud, which is often compounded further by the involvement of several suspects, may justify the extensive length of proceedings (see, among other authorities, C.P. and Others v. France, no. 36009/97, § 30, 1 August 2000; Hozee v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, p. 1102, § 52; Wejrup v. Denmark (dec.), no. 49126/99, ECHR 2002-IV, Petersen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 6315/02, 13 May 2004 and Frederiksen v. Denmark (dec.), 23012/02, 16 September 2004 ).
• EGMR, 09.10.2007 - 3103/05

  MAKSIMOVIC v. SERBIA

  The Court recalls at the outset that proceedings concerning economic offences, such as fraud and tax offences, may be rather complex and may justify lengthy proceedings (see e.g. Hozee v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, p. 1102, § 52, and Wejrup v. Denmark (dec.), no. 49126/99, ECHR 2002-IV).
• EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 70072/01

  NAMND v. SWEDEN

  The Court reiterates that the scale and complexity of a criminal case concerning financial crimes, like fraud, may justify the extensive length of proceedings (see, among other authorities, C.P. and Others v. France, no. 36009/97, § 30, 1 August 2000, Hozee v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, p. 1102, § 52; Wejrup v. Denmark (dec.), no. 49126/99, ECHR 2002-IV, Petersen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 6315/02, 13 May 2004, Frederiksen v. Denmark (dec.), 23012/02, 16 September 2004, and Wallin Karlsen (dec.), no. 23523/02, 1 February 2005).