Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BRONSKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 3229/15

  The Court reiterates that individuals" physical and psychological integrity (see, for example, X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 22, Series A no. 91, and Y.F. v. Turkey, no. 24209/94, § 33, ECHR 2003-IX) as well as their involvement in the choice of medical care provided to them and their consent in that respect (see, for example, Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, §§ 61 and 63, ECHR 2002-III, and Glass v. the United Kingdom, no. 61827/00, § 70, ECHR 2004-II) fall within the scope of the right to respect for one's private life enshrined in Article 8 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00

  Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 3229/15

  The Court has held, in connection with the right to life enshrined in Article 2, that the Contracting States are required to set up an effective independent judicial system so that the cause of death of patients in the care of the medical profession, whether in the public or the private sector, can be determined; it has held that, in the specific sphere of medical negligence, access to proceedings for "civil" liability are sufficient in principle (see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, §§ 48-51, ECHR 2002-I; and Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, §§ 89-91, ECHR 2004-VIII).
• EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

  CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 3229/15

  The Court has held, in connection with the right to life enshrined in Article 2, that the Contracting States are required to set up an effective independent judicial system so that the cause of death of patients in the care of the medical profession, whether in the public or the private sector, can be determined; it has held that, in the specific sphere of medical negligence, access to proceedings for "civil" liability are sufficient in principle (see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, §§ 48-51, ECHR 2002-I; and Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, §§ 89-91, ECHR 2004-VIII).

 
• EGMR, 22.07.2003 - 24209/94

  Y.F. c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 3229/15

  The Court reiterates that individuals" physical and psychological integrity (see, for example, X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 22, Series A no. 91, and Y.F. v. Turkey, no. 24209/94, § 33, ECHR 2003-IX) as well as their involvement in the choice of medical care provided to them and their consent in that respect (see, for example, Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, §§ 61 and 63, ECHR 2002-III, and Glass v. the United Kingdom, no. 61827/00, § 70, ECHR 2004-II) fall within the scope of the right to respect for one's private life enshrined in Article 8 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 75725/01

  TROCELLIER v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 3229/15

  These principles are undoubtedly also applicable in the same context to serious interference with the right to physical integrity falling within the scope of Article 8 of the Convention (see Trocellier v. France (dec.), no. 75725/01, ECHR 2006-XIV; Codarcea v. Romania, no. 31675/04, § 103, 2 June 2009; Yardimci v. Turkey, no. 25266/05, § 57, 5 January 2010; and Spyra and Kranczkowski v. Poland, no. 19764/07, § 82, 25 September 2012).
• EGMR, 05.01.2010 - 25266/05

  YARDIMCI c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 3229/15

  These principles are undoubtedly also applicable in the same context to serious interference with the right to physical integrity falling within the scope of Article 8 of the Convention (see Trocellier v. France (dec.), no. 75725/01, ECHR 2006-XIV; Codarcea v. Romania, no. 31675/04, § 103, 2 June 2009; Yardimci v. Turkey, no. 25266/05, § 57, 5 January 2010; and Spyra and Kranczkowski v. Poland, no. 19764/07, § 82, 25 September 2012).
• EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 19764/07

  SPYRA ET KRANCZKOWSKI c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 3229/15

  These principles are undoubtedly also applicable in the same context to serious interference with the right to physical integrity falling within the scope of Article 8 of the Convention (see Trocellier v. France (dec.), no. 75725/01, ECHR 2006-XIV; Codarcea v. Romania, no. 31675/04, § 103, 2 June 2009; Yardimci v. Turkey, no. 25266/05, § 57, 5 January 2010; and Spyra and Kranczkowski v. Poland, no. 19764/07, § 82, 25 September 2012).