Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  POYRAZ c. TURQUIE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
  Partiellement irrecevable Violation de l'art. 6-1 Non-violation de l'art. 10 (französisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• lehofer.at (Kurzinformation)

  Ministerielle "Leaks" nicht durch Art 10 EMRK gerechtfertigt - neuere EGMR-Rechtsprechung zu Art 10 EMRK

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [FRE]

Wird zitiert von ... (8)

• EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 20261/12

  Ungarn verstößt gegen Menschenrechtskonvention

  64119/00 and 76292/01, §§ 77-79, 13 November 2008; Kudeshkina v. Russia, no. 29492/05, § 79, 26 February 2009; Poyraz v. Turkey, no. 15966/06, §§ 55-57, 7 December 2010; and Harabin, cited above, § 149).
• EGMR, 06.07.2023 - 21181/19

  TULEYA v. POLAND

  64119/00 and 76292/01, §§ 77-79, 13 November 2008; Kudeshkina, cited above, § 79; Poyraz v. Turkey, no. 15966/06, §§ 55-57, 7 December 2010; Harabin v. Slovakia, no. 58688/11, 20 November 2012; Baka, cited above, § 140; Miroslava Todorova v. Bulgaria, no. 40072/13, § 153, 19 October 2021; and ?"urek v. Poland, no. 39650/18, § 201, 16 June 2022).
• EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 20261/12

  Rechter Richtersturz nicht rechtens

  64119/00 and 76292/01, §§ 77-79, 13 November 2008; Kudeshkina v. Russia, no. 29492/05, § 79, 26 February 2009; Poyraz v. Turkey, no. 15966/06, §§ 55-57, 7 December 2010; and Harabin v. Slovakia, cited above, § 149).

 
• EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 51160/06

  DI GIOVANNI c. ITALIE

  Ainsi le veulent les impératifs supérieurs de la justice et la grandeur de la fonction judiciaire (voir, mutatis mutandis, Buscemi c. Italie, no 29569/95, § 67, CEDH 1999-VI ; Kayasu, précité, § 100 ; et Poyraz c. Turquie, no 15966/06, § 69, 7 décembre 2010).
• EGMR, 16.06.2022 - 39650/18

  ZUREK v. POLAND

  64119/00 and 76292/01, §§ 77-79, 13 November 2008; Kudeshkina, cited above, § 79; Poyraz v. Turkey, no. 15966/06, §§ 55-57, 7 December 2010; Harabin v. Slovakia, no. 58688/11, 20 November 2012; Baka, cited above, § 140; and Miroslava Todorova v. Bulgaria, no. 40072/13, § 153, 19 October 2021).
• EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 58688/11

  HARABIN v. SLOVAKIA

  64119/00 and 76292/01, §§ 77-79, 13 November 2008; Kudeshkina v. Russia, no. 29492/05, § 79, 26 February 2009; and Poyraz v. Turkey, no. 15966/06, §§ 55-57, 7 December 2010).
• EGMR, 14.06.2018 - 40597/08

  RUNGAINIS v. LATVIA

  In that regard, an important aspect is the privileged position that persons with public responsibilities enjoy in accessing the media owing to their position of authority (see Poyraz v. Turkey, no. 15966/06, § 78, 7 December 2010).
• EGMR, 26.02.2019 - 65717/14

  AUGUSTE v. LITHUANIA

  The Court considers that, as in Harabin v. Slovakia (no. 58688/11, §§ 151-52, 20 November 2012), it was the applicant's professional behaviour in the context of the administration of justice which represented the essential aspect of the case (compare and contrast Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, §§ 48-50, ECHR 1999-VII; Kudeshkina v. Russia, no. 29492/05, § 79, 26 February 2009; Poyraz v. Turkey, no. 15966/06, § 58, 7 December 2010; Baka, cited above, §§ 148-49, where the Court found a link between the measures complained of and the exercise, by the applicants, of their right to freedom of expression).