Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MISHGJONI v. ALBANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13+6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13+6-1 (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 07.12.2010 - 18381/05
• EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 18381/05

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 10508/02

  GJONBOCARI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2010 - 18381/05

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, for example, Gjonbocari and Others v. Albania, no. 10508/02, § 61, 23 October 2007).

  The Court has moreover found similar violations of Article 13 of the Convention concerning the length of the proceedings in respect of Albania (see, for example, Gjonbocari and Others v. Albania, no. 10508/02, §§ 73-82, 23 October 2007, and Marini v. Albania, no. 3738/02, §§ 147-158, ECHR 2007-XIV (extracts)).

• EGMR, 19.10.2005 - 32555/96

  ROCHE c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2010 - 18381/05

  The Court reiterates that only legal costs and expenses found to have been actually and necessarily incurred (in the case of domestic proceedings, in seeking redress for the violations of the Convention found or preventing a violation occurring) and which are reasonable as to quantum are recoverable under Article 41 of the Convention (see, for example, Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 79, ECHR 1999-II; Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-VI; and Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 182, ECHR 2005-X).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2010 - 18381/05

  Article 13 of the Convention guarantees the availability at a national level of a remedy to enforce the substance of the Convention rights and freedoms in whatever form they may happen to be secured in the domestic legal order (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI).

 
• EGMR, 19.04.2007 - 63235/00

  VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2010 - 18381/05

  The applicant maintained that the domestic proceedings concerned a "civil" right in the light of this Court's judgment in Gjyli v. Albania, no. 32907/07, § 37, 29 September 2009 and Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 62, ECHR 2007-IV, § 62, 8 August 2006.
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2010 - 18381/05

  The Court recalls that in order for Article 13 to apply, an applicant must have an "arguable claim" that he has been subjected to a violation of the Convention rights (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 55, Series A no. 131).
• EGMR, 08.02.2001 - 47936/99

  PITKEVICH v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2010 - 18381/05

  The Government relied on the "functional" criterion as provided for in Pellegrin v. France [GC], no. 28541/95, § 66-67, ECHR 1999-VIII and Pitkevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 47936/99, 8 February 2001 in that a judge "participates directly in the exercise of powers conferred by public law and performs duties designed to safeguard the general interests of the State".
• EGMR, 01.10.2009 - 23554/03

  MAKAROVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2010 - 18381/05

  Moreover, the Court recalls that it is for the Contracting States to organise their legal systems in such a way that the competent authorities can meet the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention, including the obligation to hear cases within a reasonable time (see Makarova v. Russia, no. 23554/03, § 42, 1 October 2009).