Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.04.2011 - 50869/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,53425) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2011 - 50869/08
Nevertheless, the only remedies which Article 35 of the Convention requires to be exhausted are those that relate to the breaches alleged and at the same time are available and sufficient (see, among many other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, §§ 74-75, ECHR 1999-V; Giacometti and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 34939/97, ECHR 2001-XII; Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, §§ 43-45, ECHR 2006-II; McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, §§ 107-108, ECHR 2010-...; and recently, Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 34932/04, § 75, 6 January 2011). - EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06
McFARLANE v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2011 - 50869/08
Nevertheless, the only remedies which Article 35 of the Convention requires to be exhausted are those that relate to the breaches alleged and at the same time are available and sufficient (see, among many other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, §§ 74-75, ECHR 1999-V; Giacometti and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 34939/97, ECHR 2001-XII; Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, §§ 43-45, ECHR 2006-II; McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, §§ 107-108, ECHR 2010-...; and recently, Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 34932/04, § 75, 6 January 2011).