Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.05.2014 - 25781/94 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CHYPRE c. TURQUIE
Art. 35, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 1, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
Partiellement irrecevable Préjudice moral - réparation (Article 41 - Préjudice moral Satisfaction équitable) (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CYPRUS v. TURKEY
Art. 35, Art. 41, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 1, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
Remainder inadmissible Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage Just satisfaction) (englisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse (4)
- zeit.de (Pressebericht, 12.05.2014)
Türkei muss wegen Besetzung Zyperns Millionen zahlen
- taz.de (Pressebericht, 12.05.2014)
Griechische Zyprioten kriegen Geld
- Telepolis (Pressebericht, 13.05.2014)
90 Millionen für Tötungen und Enteignungungen von Griechen
- juraforum.de (Kurzinformation)
Türkei muss wegen Menschenrechtsverstößen 90 Millionen Schadensersatz an Zypern zahlen
Besprechungen u.ä. (2)
- verfassungsblog.de (Entscheidungsbesprechung)
Straßburg verschafft sich mehr Durchschlagskraft
- verfassungsblog.de (Entscheidungsbesprechung)
Der EGMR als regionaler IGH? Entschädigung und Bestrafung im Staatenbeschwerdeverfahren
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 22.11.1994 - 25781/94
- EKMR, 28.06.1996 - 25781/94
- EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 25781/94
- EGMR, 12.05.2014 - 25781/94
- EGMR, 03.09.2020 - 25781/94
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (17)
- EGMR, 05.04.2000 - 34382/97
DENMARK v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2014 - 25781/94
This category is illustrated by the case of Denmark v. Turkey (application no. 34382/97, ECHR 2000-IV), concerning treatment contrary to Article 3 to which a Danish citizen, Mr Koç, was subjected by Turkish police officers.Denmark v. Turkey (dec.), no. 34382/97, 8 June 1999.
- EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 32772/02
Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VGT) ./. Schweiz
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2014 - 25781/94
Insofar as the Turkish Government have referred to the supervisory proceedings before the Committee of Ministers, the Court reiterates that findings of a violation in its judgments are essentially declaratory, and that, by Article 46 of the Convention, the High Contracting Parties have undertaken to abide by the final judgments of the Court in any case to which they are parties, execution being supervised by the Committee of Ministers (Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, § 61, ECHR 2009).Of course, as the Court held for example in its judgment in Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) ([GC], no. 32772/02, § 67, ECHR 2009), it cannot be said that the powers assigned to the Committee of Ministers by Article 46 are being encroached on where the Court has to deal with relevant new information in the context of a fresh application, especially where the Committee of Ministers has ended its supervision of the execution of the Court's judgment by means of a final resolution.
- EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99
Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2014 - 25781/94
In particular, there was an impasse resulting from different interpretations of the decision in Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec. [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010); unlike Turkey, the Cypriot Government did not consider that it could be interpreted as a finding that Turkey had satisfied its obligations in order to comply with the principal judgment.46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010.
- EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 3843/02
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2014 - 25781/94
In particular, there was an impasse resulting from different interpretations of the decision in Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec. [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010); unlike Turkey, the Cypriot Government did not consider that it could be interpreted as a finding that Turkey had satisfied its obligations in order to comply with the principal judgment.46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010.
- EGMR - 19993/04
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2014 - 25781/94
In particular, there was an impasse resulting from different interpretations of the decision in Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec. [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010); unlike Turkey, the Cypriot Government did not consider that it could be interpreted as a finding that Turkey had satisfied its obligations in order to comply with the principal judgment.46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010.
- EGMR - 21819/04
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2014 - 25781/94
In particular, there was an impasse resulting from different interpretations of the decision in Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec. [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010); unlike Turkey, the Cypriot Government did not consider that it could be interpreted as a finding that Turkey had satisfied its obligations in order to comply with the principal judgment.46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010.
- EGMR - 14163/04
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2014 - 25781/94
In particular, there was an impasse resulting from different interpretations of the decision in Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec. [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010); unlike Turkey, the Cypriot Government did not consider that it could be interpreted as a finding that Turkey had satisfied its obligations in order to comply with the principal judgment.46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010.
- EGMR - 10200/04
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2014 - 25781/94
In particular, there was an impasse resulting from different interpretations of the decision in Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec. [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010); unlike Turkey, the Cypriot Government did not consider that it could be interpreted as a finding that Turkey had satisfied its obligations in order to comply with the principal judgment.46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010.
- EGMR - 13466/03
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2014 - 25781/94
In particular, there was an impasse resulting from different interpretations of the decision in Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec. [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010); unlike Turkey, the Cypriot Government did not consider that it could be interpreted as a finding that Turkey had satisfied its obligations in order to comply with the principal judgment.46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR 2010.
- EGMR, 18.01.1978 - 5310/71
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2014 - 25781/94
The issue is raised only in the operative part; no reference is made to it in the body of the judgment, unlike in the case of Ireland v. the United Kingdom (no. 5310/71, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25), where the Court explained clearly why it had not applied Article 50 (in that case, the Irish Government had not sought compensation for any individual). - EuGH, 10.04.1984 - 79/83
Harz / Deutsche Tradax
- EGMR, 13.06.1994 - 10588/83
BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN (ARTICLE 50)
- EGMR, 23.11.1976 - 5100/71
ENGEL AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS (ARTICLE 50)
- EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 45330/99
S.L. v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 18.12.1984 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE (ARTICLE 50)
- EKMR, 16.05.1995 - 19255/92
OBERSCHLICK v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 45036/98
Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi ./. Irland