Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PLOTNICOVA v. MOLDOVA

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) ...

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 38623/05

  The Court reiterates that, according to its case-law, ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum level is, in the nature of things, relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI, and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 38623/05

  The Court reiterates that, according to its case-law, ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum level is, in the nature of things, relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI, and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

  EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 38623/05

  However, it recalls that "... it is a requirement of fairness under paragraph 1 of Article 6... that the prosecution authorities disclose to the defence all material evidence for or against the accused" (see Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 36, Series A no. 247-B).
• EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93

  NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 38623/05

  The Court observes that in order for costs and expenses to be included in an award under Article 41 it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-VIII).
• EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86

  VIDAL c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 38623/05

  However, the absence of any decision by the domestic courts in response to the applicant's request to hear O.G. raises in itself a serious issue under Article 6 of the Convention since it deprived the applicant of possibly an important means of defence (see, for instance, Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, § 34, Series A no. 235-B).

• EGMR - 42646/14 (anhängig)

  EL CHABAB c. BELGIQUE

  Le requérant a-t-il bénéficié d'un procès équitable conformément à l'article 6 §§ 1 et 3 de la Convention ? Plus précisément, dans les circonstances de l'espèce, le requérant a-t-il disposé des facilités nécessaires à la préparation de sa défense au regard de l'article 6 § 3 b) de la Convention (Plotnicova c. Moldova, no 38623/05, § 47, 15 mai 2012) ? Par ailleurs, le requérant a-t-il sollicité et obtenu l'assistance gratuite d'un interprète au sens de l'article 6 § 3 e) de la Convention au cours de la procédure pénale (comp. Kamasinski c. Autriche, 19 décembre 1989, §§ 74 et suiv., série A no 168, H.K. c. Belgique (déc.), no 22738/08, 12 janvier 2010, et Vizgirda c. Slovénie, no 59868/08, §§ 76 et suiv., 28 août 2018) ?.