Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SECIC v. CROATIA

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 1 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 40116/02
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 40116/02

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 18.12.1996 - 21987/93

  AKSOY c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 40116/02

  Article 35 § 1 also requires that the complaints intended to be brought subsequently before the Court should have been made to the appropriate domestic body, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements laid down in domestic law, but not that recourse should be had to remedies which are inadequate or ineffective (see Aksoy v. Turkey, no. 21987/93, §§ 51-52, ECHR 1996-VI, and Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, no. 21893/93, §§ 65-67, ECHR 1996-IV).
• EGMR, 25.03.1993 - 13134/87

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 40116/02

  The applicants rely on the Costello-Roberts case, where the Court concluded that the abuse suffered by the applicant did not amount to ill-treatment within the meaning of Article 3, but considered it as possibly interfering with his physical integrity under Article 8 (see Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 March 1993, Series A no. 247-C, p. 60, § 34).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 40116/02

  Before the Court, allegations of ill-treatment must be supported by appropriate evidence, to the standard of proof "beyond reasonable doubt" (see Labita v. Italy, no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV), but such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact.

 
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 40116/02

  According to the Court's case-law, Article 13 only applies where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52).
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 33394/96

  PRICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 40116/02

  The Court recalls that ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum is relative: it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the nature and context of the treatment, its duration, its physical and mental effects and, in some instances, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII).
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 40116/02

  They rely on the Nachova case and on the assumption that a complaint of racist violence should be accorded utmost priority, as they are particularly destructive of fundamental rights (see Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, ECHR 2005-...).
• EGMR, 14.05.2002 - 38621/97

  ZEHNALOVÁ ET ZEHNAL c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 40116/02

  It is incumbent on the individual concerned to demonstrate the existence of a special link between the situation complained of and the particular needs of his or her private life (see Zehnalovà and Zehnal v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 38621/97, ECHR 2002-V).