Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 3150/05   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2007,59209
EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 3150/05 (https://dejure.org/2007,59209)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17.07.2007 - 3150/05 (https://dejure.org/2007,59209)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17. Juli 2007 - 3150/05 (https://dejure.org/2007,59209)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,59209) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung




Kontextvorschau:





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (7)  

  • EGMR, 05.09.2018 - 58559/12

    BOROVIC ET 4 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA SERBIE

    Recalling that the question of the general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the group of cases Jevremovic (Application No. 3150/05) and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee's evaluation of the general measures in relation to the excessive length of judicial proceedings and an effective domestic remedy;.
  • EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 18650/09

    TOMIC AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO

    The Court has already held that, given its nature, an appeal on points of law must, in principle and whenever available in accordance with the relevant civil procedure rules, be considered an effective domestic remedy within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Jevremovic v. Serbia, no. 3150/05, § 41, 17 July 2007; Ilic v. Serbia, no. 30132/04, §§ 20 and 21, 9 October 2007; and, mutatis mutandis, Debelic v. Croatia, no. 2448/03, §§ 20 and 21, 26 May 2005).
  • EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 47460/07

    RAKIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

    The Court considers that, given its nature, an appeal on points of law must, in principle and whenever available in accordance with the relevant civil procedure rules, be considered an effective domestic remedy within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see paragraphs 24-27 above; see also Jevremovic v. Serbia, no. 3150/05, § 41, 17 July 2007; Ilic v. Serbia, no. 30132/04, §§ 20 and 21, 9 October 2007; and, mutatis mutandis, Debelic v. Croatia, no. 2448/03, §§ 20 and 21, 26 May 2005).
  • EGMR, 13.04.2010 - 42559/08

    KRIVOSEJ v. SERBIA

    Lastly, the Court considers that the Government should, with particular diligence and by appropriate means, secure the effective and speedy enforcement of the final access order of 7 October 2002, as modified on 21 May 2003 (see, mutatis mutandis, Jevremovic v. Serbia, no. 3150/05, § 135, 17 July 2007).
  • EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 63206/10

    JÜSSI OSAWE v. ESTONIA

    The Court has held on numerous occasions that Article 6 was applicable to paternity proceedings (see paragraph 36 above and also, for example, Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, §§ 35-46, ECHR 2002-I, and Jevremovic v. Serbia, no. 3150/05, §§ 66-86, 17 July 2007).
  • EGMR, 07.05.2009 - 3451/05

    KALACHEVA v. RUSSIA

    The Court recalls that, according to Article 8 of the Convention, in ruling on an application to have paternity established, the courts should have special regard to the best interests of the child at issue (see Jevremovic v. Serbia, no. 3150/05, § 109, 17 July 2007).
  • EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 45251/07

    M.V. v. SERBIA

    Moreover, having regard to its findings in respect of Article 6 § 1 and its prior judgments on the issue (see, mutatis mutandis, Jevremovic v. Serbia, no. 3150/05, § 120-122, 17 July 2007), the Court considers that, at the relevant time, there was indeed no effective remedy under domestic law for the applicant's complaint about the length of the proceedings in question.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht