Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 22182/10   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2015,33667
EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 22182/10 (https://dejure.org/2015,33667)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17.11.2015 - 22182/10 (https://dejure.org/2015,33667)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17. November 2015 - 22182/10 (https://dejure.org/2015,33667)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,33667) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    SEYFETTIN GÜNES v. TURKEY

    Violation of Article 6+6-1 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (englisch)

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 4860/09

    TURGUT ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 22182/10
    The relevant domestic law and practice in force at the material time can be found in the following judgments: Bati and Others v. Turkey, (nos. 33097/06 and 57834/00 §§ 95-99, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)); Salduz v. Turkey [GC], (no. 36391/02, §§ 27-31, 27 November 2008); and Turgut and Others v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 4860/09, §§ 19-26 26 March 2013).

    Subsequently, in its decision in Turgut and Others v. Turkey (no. 4860/09, 26 March 2013), the Court declared a new application inadmissible on the ground that the applicants had failed to exhaust domestic remedies once the new domestic remedy had come into being.

  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

    ILHAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 22182/10
    The national authorities however failed to initiate an investigation into the applicant's claim that he had been coerced by the police into signing his statements and his allegations of ill-treatment despite the fact that under Article 153 of the former Code of Criminal Procedure, in force at the material time, a public prosecutor who had been informed of a situation that gave rise to a suspicion that an offence had been committed was obliged to investigate the facts by conducting the inquiries necessary to identify the perpetrators (see Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 36, ECHR 2000-VII; and Mocanu and Others, cited above, § 265).
  • EGMR - 45886/07

    [FRE]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 22182/10
    The Court reiterates at the outset that in cases concerning an investigation into ill-treatment, applicants are expected to take steps to keep track of its progress, or lack thereof, and to lodge their applications with due expedition once they are, or should have become, aware of the lack of any effective criminal investigation (see Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 263, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

    KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.11.2015 - 22182/10
    The relevant domestic law and practice in force at the material time can be found in the following judgments: Bati and Others v. Turkey, (nos. 33097/06 and 57834/00 §§ 95-99, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)); Salduz v. Turkey [GC], (no. 36391/02, §§ 27-31, 27 November 2008); and Turgut and Others v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 4860/09, §§ 19-26 26 March 2013).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht