Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 42969/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,61201) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71
Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 42969/98
That provision entitles individuals to contend that a law in itself violates their rights, without any individual measure of implementation, if they are directly affected by it or run a risk of being directly affected by it (see, inter alia, Klass and Others v. Germany, judgment of 6 September 1976, Series A no. 28, § 33). - EGMR, 18.07.1994 - 13580/88
KARLHEINZ SCHMIDT v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 42969/98
Although the application of Article 14 does not presuppose a breach of those provisions - and to this extent it is autonomous -, there can be no room for its application unless the facts at issue fall within the ambit of one or more of the latter (see, among many other authorities, the Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany, judgment of 18 July 1994, Series A no. 291-B, § 22, and the Van Raalte v. the Netherlands, judgment of 21 February 1997, Reports 1997-I, § 33). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 42969/98
According to the Court's case-law, Article 13 applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52).