Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BASU v. GERMANY

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for ...

• doev.de

  Basu/Deutschland - Verpflichtung zur unabhängigen Überprüfung von Racial-Profiling-Vorwürfen

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• lto.de (Kurzinformation)

  Diskriminierung: Deutschland hat Racial-Profiling-Vorwurf nicht genug geprüft

Besprechungen u.ä.

• verfassungsblog.de (Entscheidungsbesprechung)

  Ohne Beweislastumkehr doch kein Knaller für Racial-Profiling Prozesse

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BASU v. GERMANY

  Art. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 14Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Papierfundstellen

• NJW 2023, 139
• NVwZ 2022, 1883

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 55762/00

  TIMISHEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 215/19

  24. The Court further reiterates that racial discrimination is a particularly egregious kind of discrimination and, in view of its perilous consequences, requires from the authorities special vigilance and a vigorous reaction (see, in the context of Article 14, Timishev v. Russia, nos. 55762/00 and 55974/00, § 56, ECHR 2005-XII, and Sejdi and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos.

  a rule, it is for the applicant to show a difference in treatment and for the Government to show that it was justified (see Timishev v. Russia, nos. 55762/00 and 55974/00, § 57, 13 December 2015; D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic, no. 57325/00, § 177, 13 November 2007; and Di Trizio v. Switzerland, no. 7186/09, § 84, 2 February 2016).

• OVG Nordrhein-Westfalen, 07.08.2018 - 5 A 294/16

  An die Hautfarbe anknüpfende Identitätsfeststellung durch die Bundespolizei am …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 215/19

  3 See, respectively, Higher Administrative Court Baden-Württemberg, 1 S 1469/17, 13 February 2018; and Higher Administrative Court Nordrhein-Westfalen, 5 A 294/16, 7 August 2018, § 74-75.4 Court of Justice of the European Union, C-9/16, 21 June 2017 (EU:C:2017:483).
• EuGH, 21.06.2017 - C-9/16

  Grenzkontrollen: Schleierfahndung nur mit Einschränkungen erlaubt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 215/19

  3 See, respectively, Higher Administrative Court Baden-Württemberg, 1 S 1469/17, 13 February 2018; and Higher Administrative Court Nordrhein-Westfalen, 5 A 294/16, 7 August 2018, § 74-75.4 Court of Justice of the European Union, C-9/16, 21 June 2017 (EU:C:2017:483).

 
• VGH Baden-Württemberg, 13.02.2018 - 1 S 1469/17

  Ausübung der Befugnis zur Durchführung von Identitätskontrollen im Grenzraum …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 215/19

  3 See, respectively, Higher Administrative Court Baden-Württemberg, 1 S 1469/17, 13 February 2018; and Higher Administrative Court Nordrhein-Westfalen, 5 A 294/16, 7 August 2018, § 74-75.4 Court of Justice of the European Union, C-9/16, 21 June 2017 (EU:C:2017:483).
• EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 27996/06

  SEJDIC ET FINCI c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 215/19

  27996/06 and 34836/06, § 43, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11

  DENISOV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 215/19

  23. In certain contexts, the Court has considered it necessary to specifically examine whether the effects of the act in question attained a threshold of severity ­ that is, had serious negative effects on the individual's private life ­ in order for Article 8 to be applicable (see, in particular, Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, §§ 110-13, 25 September 2018).
• BVerfG, 19.06.2018 - 1 BvR 3196/15

  Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 215/19

  9. On 19 June 2018 the Federal Constitutional Court declined to consider a constitutional complaint by the applicant (file no. 1 BvR 3196/15), in which the applicant had alleged a breach of his right to effective judicial protection, taken together with his right to selfdetermination in the sphere of information, his right to freedom of movement and the prohibition on discrimination.
• EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 64320/01

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 215/19

  41138/98 and 64320/01, § 96, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts), and Burlya and Others v. Ukraine, no. 3289/10, §§ 161 and 169-70, 6 November 2018).
• EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 3289/10

  BURLYA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 215/19

  41138/98 and 64320/01, § 96, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts), and Burlya and Others v. Ukraine, no. 3289/10, §§ 161 and 169-70, 6 November 2018).
• EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 29555/13

  F.O. v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 215/19

  In this context, it is important to reiterate that the State enjoys a margin of appreciation in determining the manner in which to organise its system to ensure compliance with the Convention (compare, mutatis mutandis, F.O. v. Croatia, no. 29555/13, § 91, 22 April 2021).
• EKMR, 09.09.1992 - 16810/90

  REYNTJENS contre la BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 14.01.2021 - 59648/13

  VIG v. HUNGARY

• EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 43868/18

  WA BAILE c. SUISSE

  La Cour précise que dans le cadre de la requête no 43868/18, le requérant invoque à l'appui d'une violation de l'article 14 non seulement l'article 8, mais aussi l'article 6 § 2. Toutefois, à la lumière des arrêts rendus récemment en matière de profilage racial (Basu c. Allemagne, no 215/19, 18 octobre 2022, et Muhammad c. Espagne, no 34085/17, 18 octobre 2022), la Cour estime opportun d'examiner le présent grief sous l'angle de l'article 14 combiné seulement avec l'article 8 de la Convention.
• EGMR, 18.10.2022 - 34085/17

  MUHAMMAD v. SPAIN

  The two cases which the Chamber of the Third Section has decided on the same day - Muhammad v. Spain (no. 34085/17) and Basu v. Germany (no. 215/19) - followed the Court's case-law as set out in Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria ([GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 157, ECHR 2005-VII), Stoica v. Romania (no. 42722/02 § 126, 4 March 2008), and the more recent cases quoted in both judgments delivered today (see Basu, cited above, §§ 38-41, and paragraphs 91-95 of the present judgment).
• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 24225/19

  GEORGIAN MUSLIM RELATIONS AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  In addition, the Court has recognised that a duty of the authorities to investigate possible discriminatory attitudes may be implicit in their responsibilities under Article 14 of the Convention in certain circumstances, including when such attitudes resulting in the stigmatisation of the person concerned are at issue in the context of Article 8 (see Basu v. Germany, no. 215/19, § 33, 18 October 2022).