Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SAMARDZIC v. CROATIA

  No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SAMARDZIC v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 32486/14

  The right of access, namely the right to institute proceedings before a court in civil matters, constitutes one aspect of this "right to court" (see, notably, Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, §§ 28-36, Series A no. 18).
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  STANEV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 32486/14

  However, the right of access to a court is not absolute, but may be subject to limitations; these are permitted by implication since the right of access by its very nature calls for regulation by the State, regulation which may vary in time and in place according to the needs and resources of the community and of individuals (see Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others, cited above, § 89, and Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 230, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 18.02.2009 - 55707/00

  Andrejeva ./. Lettland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 32486/14

  However, where such courts do exist, the guarantees of Article 6 must be complied with, for instance in that it guarantees to litigants an effective right of access to the courts for the determination of their "civil rights and obligations" (see, among many other authorities, Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707/00, § 97, ECHR 2009; Egic v. Croatia, no. 32806/09, § 46, 5 June 2014, and Shamoyan v. Armenia, no. 18499/08, § 29, 7 July 2015).

 
• EGMR, 28.06.1990 - 11761/85

  Obermeier ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 32486/14

  In this connection, it is true that the right of access to a court requires that disputes concerning civil rights and obligations be examined by a "tribunal" which has full jurisdiction, that is, jurisdiction to examine all questions of fact and law relevant to the dispute before it (see Terra Woningen B.V. v. the Netherlands, 17 December 1996, § 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI; Beaumartin v. France, 24 November 1994, § 38, Series A no. 296-B, and Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, § 70, Series A no. 179).
• EGMR, 26.07.2002 - 32911/96

  MEFTAH AND OTHERS v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 32486/14

  As regards the courts of cassation appeal, the Court has held that given the special nature of their role, which is limited to reviewing whether the law has been correctly applied, the procedure followed in such courts may be more formal (see Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96, 35237/97 and 34595/97, § 41, ECHR 2002 VII).
• EGMR, 24.11.1994 - 15287/89

  BEAUMARTIN c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 32486/14

  In this connection, it is true that the right of access to a court requires that disputes concerning civil rights and obligations be examined by a "tribunal" which has full jurisdiction, that is, jurisdiction to examine all questions of fact and law relevant to the dispute before it (see Terra Woningen B.V. v. the Netherlands, 17 December 1996, § 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI; Beaumartin v. France, 24 November 1994, § 38, Series A no. 296-B, and Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, § 70, Series A no. 179).
• EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 20482/03

  CIBICKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 32486/14

  Indeed, the Court has stressed that there is no right under Article 6 to lodge an appeal in civil matters (see Cibicki v. Poland, no. 20482/03, § 30, 3 March 2009).