Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KULEVSKIY v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KULEVSKIY v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 02.03.2010 - 61498/08

  AL-SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 20696/12

  Similarly, Article 2 of the Convention prohibits the extradition or deportation of an individual to another State where substantial grounds have been shown for a belief that he or she would face a real risk of being subjected to the death penalty there (see Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, § 123, ECHR 2010 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 71555/01

  EINHORN c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 20696/12

  In the light of the foregoing, the Court considers that the assurance obtained by the Russian authorities was such as to avert the risk of the applicant being subjected to the death penalty in the event of his extradition and conviction (see, with necessary changes made, Abu Salem v. Portugal (dec.), no. 26844/04, 9 May 2006; Saoudi v. Spain (dec.), no. 22871/06, 18 September 2006; Einhorn v. France (dec.), no. 71555/01, 16 October 2001; Nivette v. France (dec.), no. 44190/98, 14 December 2000; Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 24027/07

  Babar Ahmad u.a. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 20696/12

  24027/07, 11949/08 and 36742/08, § 119, 6 July 2010; and Harkins and Edwards v. the United Kingdom, nos.

 
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 9146/07

  HARKINS AND EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 20696/12

  9146/07 and 32650/07, § 91, 17 January 2012; see also, a contrario, Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi, cited above, §§ 43-44, and Bader and Kanbor v. Sweden, no. 13284/04, § 45, ECHR 2005-XI).
• EGMR, 03.07.2001 - 44190/98

  NIVETTE contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 20696/12

  In the light of the foregoing, the Court considers that the assurance obtained by the Russian authorities was such as to avert the risk of the applicant being subjected to the death penalty in the event of his extradition and conviction (see, with necessary changes made, Abu Salem v. Portugal (dec.), no. 26844/04, 9 May 2006; Saoudi v. Spain (dec.), no. 22871/06, 18 September 2006; Einhorn v. France (dec.), no. 71555/01, 16 October 2001; Nivette v. France (dec.), no. 44190/98, 14 December 2000; Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 09.05.2006 - 26844/04

  SALEM c. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 20696/12

  In the light of the foregoing, the Court considers that the assurance obtained by the Russian authorities was such as to avert the risk of the applicant being subjected to the death penalty in the event of his extradition and conviction (see, with necessary changes made, Abu Salem v. Portugal (dec.), no. 26844/04, 9 May 2006; Saoudi v. Spain (dec.), no. 22871/06, 18 September 2006; Einhorn v. France (dec.), no. 71555/01, 16 October 2001; Nivette v. France (dec.), no. 44190/98, 14 December 2000; Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 18.09.2006 - 22871/06

  SAOUDI c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 20696/12

  In the light of the foregoing, the Court considers that the assurance obtained by the Russian authorities was such as to avert the risk of the applicant being subjected to the death penalty in the event of his extradition and conviction (see, with necessary changes made, Abu Salem v. Portugal (dec.), no. 26844/04, 9 May 2006; Saoudi v. Spain (dec.), no. 22871/06, 18 September 2006; Einhorn v. France (dec.), no. 71555/01, 16 October 2001; Nivette v. France (dec.), no. 44190/98, 14 December 2000; Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos.