Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 66157/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,46834) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
YUSUPOVA v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
YUSUPOVA v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90
KEEGAN v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 66157/14
There may also be positive obligations inherent in an effective "respect" for family life (see Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 49, Series A no. 290). - EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92
HOKKANEN v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 66157/14
In cases where contact and residence disputes concerning children arise between parents and/or other members of the children's family (see, for example, Zawadka v. Poland, no. 48542/99, § 55, 23 June 2005, and Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, § 55, Series A no. 299-A), the Court's case-law has consistently held that this Convention provision includes, among other things, a right for a parent to have measures taken with a view to his or her being reunited with their child, and an obligation on the national authorities to take such measures. - EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 53377/13
STRUMIA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 66157/14
Whilst the national authorities must do their utmost to facilitate such cooperation, any obligation to apply coercion in this area must be limited, since the interests as well as the rights and freedoms of all concerned must be taken into account, as should be, more particularly, the best interests of the child and his or her rights under Article 8 of the Convention (see Strumia v. Italy, no. 53377/13, § 111, 23 June 2016; P.P. v. Poland, no. 8677/03, § 82, 8 January 2008; Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 96, ECHR 2000-I; and Hokkanen, cited above, § 53).