Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 20.12.2022 - 53282/18, 31428/20   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2022,36963
EGMR, 20.12.2022 - 53282/18, 31428/20 (https://dejure.org/2022,36963)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20.12.2022 - 53282/18, 31428/20 (https://dejure.org/2022,36963)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20. Dezember 2022 - 53282/18, 31428/20 (https://dejure.org/2022,36963)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,36963) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MORARU AND MARIN v. ROMANIA

    Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 - General prohibition of discrimination (Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 - General prohibition of discrimination);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

  • EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80

    ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2022 - 53282/18
    For example, States cannot impose traditions deriving from the idea that the man plays a predominant role and the woman a secondary role in the family (see Beeler v. Switzerland [GC], no. 78630/12, § 95, 11 October 2022, with further references, Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 78 in fine, Series A no. 94; Ünal Tekeli v. Turkey, no. 29865/96, § 63, ECHR 2004-X (extracts); Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078/06, §§ 126-127, ECHR 2012 (extracts); and Carvalho Pinto de Sousa Morais v. Portugal, no. 17484/15, § 46, 25 July 2017).
  • EuGH, 26.02.1986 - 152/84

    Marshall / Southampton und South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2022 - 53282/18
    Case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union Marshall v. Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Marshall) 71. The CJEU's judgment of 26 February 1986 in Marshall v Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority (case no. C-152/84, EU:C:1986:84) concerned the non-discrimination clause in Directive no. 76/207 EEC (see paragraph 68 above).
  • EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 27996/06

    SEJDIC ET FINCI c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2022 - 53282/18
    In applying the same term under Article 1 of Protocol No. 12, the Court therefore sees no reason to depart from the established interpretation of "discrimination" (see Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, § 55, ECHR 2009).
  • EuGH, 18.11.2010 - C-356/09

    Kleist - Sozialpolitik - Gleichbehandlung von Männern und Frauen in Arbeits- und

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2022 - 53282/18
    Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v. Christine Kleist (Kleist) 75. On 18 November 2010 the CJEU issued its judgment in the case of Kleist (case no. C-356/09, EU:C:2010:703).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 34369/97

    THLIMMENOS c. GRECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2022 - 53282/18
    Indeed, the right not to be discriminated against in the enjoyment of the rights guaranteed under the Convention is also violated when States, without an objective and reasonable justification, fail to treat differently persons whose situations are significantly different (see Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369/97, § 44, ECHR 2000-IV; Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.
  • EGMR, 12.04.2006 - 65731/01

    STEC ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2022 - 53282/18
    65731/01 and 65900/01, § 51, ECHR 2006-VI; and Guberina v. Croatia, no. 23682/13, § 70, 22 March 2016).
  • EuGH, 12.09.2013 - C-614/11

    Kuso - Sozialpolitik - Gleichbehandlung von Männern und Frauen - Richtlinie

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2022 - 53282/18
    Niederösterreichische Landes-Landwirtschaftskammer v. Anneliese Kuso (Kuso) 78. In addition to the cases mentioned above (see paragraphs 71-77 above), which were referred to in the domestic proceedings (see paragraphs 10 and 13 above), the more recent case of Kuso (case no. C-614/11, EU:C:2013:544) is also of interest in the context of the present case.
  • EuGH, 26.03.2009 - C-559/07

    Kommission / Griechenland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.12.2022 - 53282/18
    Commission v. Greece 74. In the judgment of 26 March 2009 in Commission v. Greece (case no. C-559/07, EU:C:2009:198), the CJEU considered whether the difference between men and women in terms of retirement age and the mandatory period of contribution to a pension scheme was discriminatory under the domestic law of Greece.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht