Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GABLISHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GABLISHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 73235/12

  IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 7088/11

  In the instant case, notwithstanding the fact that the authorities promptly arranged a forensic examination of the applicants" injuries, even if it was not unproblematic, the Court cannot overlook the length of time it took before an official investigation got under way and statements from pertinent witnesses were obtained (see paragraphs 18-24 above; see also Identoba and Others v. Georgia, no. 73235/12, § 66, 12 May 2015, and Timurta?? v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 89, ECHR 2000-VI).
• EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95

  REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 7088/11

  These circumstances count heavily against the applicants concerned, with the result that the burden placed on the Government to prove that the use of force was not excessive in this case is less stringent (see Spinov v. Ukraine, no. 34331/03, § 49, 27 November 2008; Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 65-78, ECHR 2000-XII; and Barta v. Hungary, no. 26137/04, § 71, 10 April 2007).
• EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

  TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 7088/11

  In the instant case, notwithstanding the fact that the authorities promptly arranged a forensic examination of the applicants" injuries, even if it was not unproblematic, the Court cannot overlook the length of time it took before an official investigation got under way and statements from pertinent witnesses were obtained (see paragraphs 18-24 above; see also Identoba and Others v. Georgia, no. 73235/12, § 66, 12 May 2015, and Timurta?? v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 89, ECHR 2000-VI).

 
• EGMR, 13.02.2014 - 66393/10

  TALI v. ESTONIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 7088/11

  The Court is mindful of the difficulties States may encounter in maintaining order and discipline in penal institutions and that a simple case of disobedience by detainees may quickly degenerate into a riot (see Gömi and Others v. Turkey, no. 35962/97, § 77, 21 December 2006; Sapozkovs v. Latvia, no. 8550/03, § 64, 11 February 2014; and Tali v. Estonia, no. 66393/10, § 75, 13 February 2014).
• EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 52442/09

  DURDEVIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 7088/11

  The fact that the prosecutor made no attempts to scrutinise the investigator's account of the incident further undermines the effectiveness of the investigation (see Matko v. Slovenia, no. 43393/98, § 90, 2 November 2006, and urÄ?evic v. Croatia, no. 52442/09, §§ 89-90, ECHR 2011 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 09.07.2015 - 32325/13

  MAFALANI v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 7088/11

  Regarding the general principles concerning the application of the six-month rule within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention, the Court refers to its relevant case-law (see, in particular, El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630/09, §§ 134-36, ECHR 2012; Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09 and 2 others, §§ 258-60, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Mafalani v. Croatia, no. 32325/13, §§ 75-83, 9 July 2015; and Akhvlediani and Others v. Georgia (dec.), no. 22026/10, 9 April 2013).
• EGMR, 15.05.2008 - 7178/03

  DEDOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 7088/11

  It observes that the three arresting officers sustained a variety of injuries during the incident (see Dilek Aslan v. Turkey, no. 34364/08, § 48, 20 October 2015, and, a contrario, Dedovskiy and Others v. Russia, no. 7178/03, § 82, ECHR 2008 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 21.12.2006 - 35962/97

  GÖMI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 7088/11

  The Court is mindful of the difficulties States may encounter in maintaining order and discipline in penal institutions and that a simple case of disobedience by detainees may quickly degenerate into a riot (see Gömi and Others v. Turkey, no. 35962/97, § 77, 21 December 2006; Sapozkovs v. Latvia, no. 8550/03, § 64, 11 February 2014; and Tali v. Estonia, no. 66393/10, § 75, 13 February 2014).
• EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 24164/07

  TÜZÜN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 7088/11

  The injuries sustained by the two applicants, on the other hand, were classified cumulatively as minor ones with no long-lasting effects on their health (see Spinov, cited above, § 50, and Tüzün v. Turkey, no. 24164/07, § 37, 5 November 2013; also compare Mikiashvili and Dvalishvili, both cited above, in which, in addition to bruising and abrasions, the applicants were diagnosed with head injuries and concussion with a long-term impact on their health).
• EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 34364/08

  DILEK ASLAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 7088/11

  It observes that the three arresting officers sustained a variety of injuries during the incident (see Dilek Aslan v. Turkey, no. 34364/08, § 48, 20 October 2015, and, a contrario, Dedovskiy and Others v. Russia, no. 7178/03, § 82, ECHR 2008 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 34331/03

  SPINOV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 10.04.2007 - 26137/04

  BARTA v. HUNGARY

• EGMR, 12.10.2023 - 60865/16

  MOLOKOV v. UKRAINE

  The Court is mindful of the difficulties States may encounter in maintaining order and discipline in penal institutions (see Gablishvili and Others v. Georgia, no. 7088/11, § 62, 21 February 2019, and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 16.02.2023 - 14142/15

  OCHIGAVA v. GEORGIA

  Moreover, there are findings by domestic and international observers about the fact that prison officers systematically resorted to violent or otherwise unlawful measures to prevent the abuse being reported (see paragraphs 42 and 43 above, and compare Gablishvili and Others v. Georgia, no. 7088/11, §§ 36 and 37, 21 February 2019).