Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CANEPA v. ITALY

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2, Art. 6, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 43572/98

  The assessment of this minimum is, in the nature of things, relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical or mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see the Ireland v. United Kingdom judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 65, § 162 et the Tyrer v. United Kingdom judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, pp. 14-15, §§ 29-30).
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

  GUZZARDI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 43572/98

  In this context, it is not sufficient that certain aspects of the situation complained of were unpleasant or even irksome (see the Guzzardi v. Italy judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, p. 40, § 107).
• EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10730/84

  BERREHAB v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 43572/98

  The Court recalls that the mutual enjoyment by parent and child of each other's company constitutes a fundamental element of family life and that the family life of parents with their children does not cease to exist following the separation of the parents or the divorce of a married couple (the Berrehab v. the Netherlands judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 138, p. 14, § 21).

 
• EGMR, 24.03.1988 - 10465/83

  OLSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 43572/98

  Finally, as to the procedural requirements implicit in Article 8 (cf. the Olsson v. Sweden judgment of 24 March 1988, Series A no. 130, p. 33 § 71), the Court finds that the applicant, assisted by counsel, was involved in the decision-making process on his request for access to a degree sufficient to provide him with the requisite protection of his interests.
• EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87

  PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 43572/98

  The effectiveness of a remedy, for the purposes of Article 13 of the Convention, does not depend on the certainty of a favourable outcome (see the Pine Valley Developments Ltd and others v. Ireland judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 27, § 66).
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92

  HOKKANEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 43572/98

  Moreover, the State enjoys a certain margin of appreciation (see, for example, the Hokkanen v. Finland judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, p. 20 § 55).
• EGMR, 27.11.1992 - 13441/87

  OLSSON c. SUÈDE (N° 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 43572/98

  The Court recalls that a fair balance must be struck between the interests of the child and those of the parent (see, for example, the Olsson v. Sweden judgment (no. 2) of 27 November 1992, Series A no. 250, pp.