Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.08.2013 - 690/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,24928) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
URBAN v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Partly struck out of the list Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99
MAJEWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.2013 - 690/12
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against the Czech Republic, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Golha v. the Czech Republic, no. 7051/06, 26 May 2011). - EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 56026/00
WENDE AND KUKOWKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.2013 - 690/12
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against the Czech Republic, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Golha v. the Czech Republic, no. 7051/06, 26 May 2011). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.2013 - 690/12
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI); WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03). - EGMR, 26.05.2011 - 7051/06
GOLHA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.2013 - 690/12
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against the Czech Republic, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Golha v. the Czech Republic, no. 7051/06, 26 May 2011). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.2013 - 690/12
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against the Czech Republic, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Golha v. the Czech Republic, no. 7051/06, 26 May 2011).