Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 67318/09, 22226/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,12041) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TWOMEY, CAMERON AND GUTHRIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 16.02.2000 - 28901/95
ROWE AND DAVIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 67318/09
Instead, it must scrutinise the decision-making procedure to ensure that, as far as possible, the procedure complied with the requirements to provide adversarial proceedings and equality of arms and incorporated adequate safeguards to protect the interests of the accused (see Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, §§ 60-62, ECHR 2000-II; Jasper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27052/95, § 53, 16 February 2000; Edwards and Lewis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39647/98 and 40461/98, § 46, ECHR 2004-X). - EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 40461/98
LEWIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 67318/09
Instead, it must scrutinise the decision-making procedure to ensure that, as far as possible, the procedure complied with the requirements to provide adversarial proceedings and equality of arms and incorporated adequate safeguards to protect the interests of the accused (see Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, §§ 60-62, ECHR 2000-II; Jasper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27052/95, § 53, 16 February 2000; Edwards and Lewis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39647/98 and 40461/98, § 46, ECHR 2004-X).
- EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 15269/13
RUSISHVILI v. GEORGIA
67318/09 and 22226/12, § 30, 28 May 2013). - EGMR, 12.12.2013 - 19165/08
DONOHOE v. IRELAND
67318/09 and 22226/12, 28 May 2013).