Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  D'AMICO v. ITALY

  Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  D'AMICO c. ITALIE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  [FRE]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 28.10.1999 - 24846/94

  ZIELINSKI ET PRADAL & GONZALEZ ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2022 - 46586/14

  The Court's assessment 33. The Court has repeatedly held that although the legislature is not prevented from enacting new retrospective provisions to regulate rights derived from the laws in force (see, for example, Anagnostopoulos and Others v. Greece, no. 39374/98, § 19, ECHR 2000-XI), the principle of the rule of law and the notion of a fair trial enshrined in Article 6 preclude any interference by the legislature - other than on compelling public-interest grounds - with the administration of justice designed to influence the judicial determination of a dispute (see, among many other authorities, Zielinski and Pradal and Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], nos. 24846/94 and 9 others, § 57, ECHR 1999-VII).
• EGMR, 20.02.2003 - 47316/99

  Rechtssache F.-N. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2022 - 46586/14

  The Government relied on the judgment in Forrer-Niedenthal v. Germany (no. 47316/99, 20 February 2003), arguing that interference by the legislature could be justified by historical generational reasons.
• EGMR, 30.01.2019 - 46286/09

  MAGGIO ET AUTRES CONTRE L'ITALIE ET 2 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2022 - 46586/14

  Respect for the rule of law and the notion of a fair trial require that any reasons adduced to justify such measures be treated with the greatest possible degree of circumspection (see Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286/09 and 4 others, § 45, 31 May 2011).

 
• EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 45175/04

  SHEFER v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2022 - 46586/14

  The assessment of this minimum level is, in the nature of things, relative and depends on all the circumstances of the case (see, among many other authorities, Shefer v. Russia (dec.), no. 45175/04, § 18, 13 March 2012).
• EGMR, 13.04.2006 - 75470/01

  SUKHOBOKOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2022 - 46586/14

  Although statutory pension regulations are liable to change and a judicial decision cannot be relied on as a guarantee against such changes in the future (see Sukhobokov v. Russia, no. 75470/01, § 26, 13 April 2006), even if such changes are to the disadvantage of certain welfare recipients, the State cannot interfere with the process of adjudication in an arbitrary manner (see, mutatis mutandis, Bulgakova v. Russia, no. 69524/01, § 42, 18 January 2007).
• EGMR, 07.11.2000 - 39374/98

  ANAGNOSTOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2022 - 46586/14

  The Court's assessment 33. The Court has repeatedly held that although the legislature is not prevented from enacting new retrospective provisions to regulate rights derived from the laws in force (see, for example, Anagnostopoulos and Others v. Greece, no. 39374/98, § 19, ECHR 2000-XI), the principle of the rule of law and the notion of a fair trial enshrined in Article 6 preclude any interference by the legislature - other than on compelling public-interest grounds - with the administration of justice designed to influence the judicial determination of a dispute (see, among many other authorities, Zielinski and Pradal and Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], nos. 24846/94 and 9 others, § 57, ECHR 1999-VII).
• EGMR, 27.05.2004 - 42219/98

  OGIS-INSTITUT STANISLAS, OGEC ST. PIE X ET BLANCHE DE CASTILLE ET AUTRES c. …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2022 - 46586/14

  They also submitted that the case was comparable to National & Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom (23 October 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VII) and OGIS-Institut Stanislas, OGEC Saint-Pie X and Blanche de Castille and Others v. France (nos. 42219/98 and 54563/00, 27 May 2004), in which the Court had found no violation because the interference was aimed at ensuring respect for the original will of the legislature, and in which the Court had also given weight to the aim of remedying a technical imperfection in the interpreted law.

• EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 38583/13

  ALBANESE ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Les principes généraux concernant la législation rétroactive visant à influencer le dénouement judiciaire d'un litige ont été résumés dans les affaires Vegotex International S.A. c. Belgique [GC], no 49812/09, 3 novembre 2022, D'Amico c. Italie, no 46586/14, 17 février 2022, et Zielinski et Pradal et Gonzalez et autres c. France [GC], nos 24846/94 et 9 autres, CEDH 1999-VII.
• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 15550/11

  VAINIERI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Les principes généraux concernant la législation rétroactive visant à influencer le dénouement judiciaire d'un litige ont été résumés dans les affaires Vegotex International S.A. c. Belgique [GC], no 49812/09, 3 novembre 2022, D'Amico c. Italie, no 46586/14, 17 février 2022, et Zielinski et Pradal et Gonzalez et autres c. France [GC], nos 24846/94 et 9 autres, CEDH 1999-VII.
• EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 65808/13

  CIANCHELLA AND OTHERS v. ITALY

  The circumstances of the case are analogous to those described in D'Amico v. Italy (no. 46586/14, 17 February 2022).