Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 05.09.1988 - 11256/84 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1988,9098) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
EGUE contre la FRANCE
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 13, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
irrecevable (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
EGUE v. FRANCE
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 13, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (4)
- EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 74012/01
GAVRIL YOSIFOV v. BULGARIA
In some cases the Court and the former Commission have found that an action for damages cannot be seen as an effective remedy in respect of complaints under Article 5 § 3 about the excessive length of time spent on remand (see Woukam Moudefo v. France, no. 10868/84, Commission decision of 21 January 1987, DR 51, p. 73; Egue v. France, no. 11256/84, Commission decision of 5 September 1988, DR 57, p. 60; Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, § 79, Series A no. 241-A; YaÄ?cı and Sargın v. Turkey, nos. - EKMR, 18.10.1995 - 23888/94
KREMZOW c. AUTRICHE
4 (Art. 5-4) constitutes the lex specialis in this area, there is no need to examine the case under the further Convention articles invoked by the applicant, in particular Article 13 (Art. 13) (No. 11256/84, Dec. 5.9.88, D.R. 57, p. 47). - EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 25648/94
ROBSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
However, the Commission recalls that the right of access to a lawyer can be subject to restrictions and the question to be considered is whether any questioning of the applicant without his solicitor is in conformity with the general principle of fairness laid down in Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention (see, for example, No. 11256/84, Dec. 5.9.88, D.R. 57 p. 47 and No. 12391/86, Dec. 13.4.89, D.R. 60 p. 182). - EKMR, 18.10.1995 - 25649/94
E. A. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
4 (Art. 5-4) constitutes the lex specialis in the area covered by it and Article 13 (Art. 13) the lex generalis, it is not necessary to examine the complaint under Article 13 (Art. 13) of the Convention (No. 11256/84, Dec. 5.9.88, D.R. 57, p. 47).