Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HOLLAND v. IRELAND

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HOLLAND c. IRLANDE

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72

  SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.04.1998 - 24827/94

  As regards the Golder and Silver judgments of the European Court of Human Rights to which the High Court was referred "in passing" (Eur. Court HR, Golder v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18 and Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61), the High Court noted that the facts of those cases were very different from those of the Kearney case.

  While the applicant invokes Articles 8 and 10 (Art. 8, 10) of the Convention, the Commission considers that this complaint falls to be considered under Article 8 (Art. 8) of the Convention (Eur. Court HR, Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, p. 41, para. 107).

• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.04.1998 - 24827/94

  As regards the Golder and Silver judgments of the European Court of Human Rights to which the High Court was referred "in passing" (Eur. Court HR, Golder v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18 and Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61), the High Court noted that the facts of those cases were very different from those of the Kearney case.
• EGMR, 25.03.1992 - 13590/88

  CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 14.04.1998 - 24827/94

  In this respect, the Commission recalls that since that judgment there have been further developments in the jurisprudence under the Convention and refers, in particular, to the Campbell judgment decided six years after the Kearney case (Eur. Court HR, Campbell v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1992, Series A no. 233) and specifically to paragraphs 44-54 thereof.

• EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 27996/06

  SEJDIC ET FINCI c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE

  [30] Holland v. Ireland, no. 24827/94, Commission decision of 14 April 1998, (DR) 93, p. 15.
• EGMR, 16.03.2006 - 58278/00

  ZDANOKA v. LATVIA

  The Convention institutions have also held that it was open to the legislature to remove political rights from persons convicted of serious or financial crimes (see Holland v. Ireland, no. 24827/94, Commission decision of 14 April 1998, DR 93-A, p. 15, and M.D.U. v. Italy (dec.), no. 58540/00, 28 January 2003).
• EGMR, 17.06.2004 - 58278/00

  ZDANOKA c. LETTONIE

  [15] Holland c. Irlande, no 24827/94, déc.