Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 14.07.1987 - 12587/86 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1987,12897) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CHAPPELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 2, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 13 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CHAPPELL c. ROYAUME-UNI
Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 2, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 13 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (3)
- EKMR, 19.10.1998 - 31416/96
PENDRAGON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
The Commission recalls that it has previously declared inadmissible a case concerning druidic access to Stonehenge (Chappell v. the United Kingdom, No. 12587/86, Dec. 14.7.97, D.R. 53, p. 241).Finally, the Commission recalls its decision in No. 12587/86 (cited above) where individuals and organisations interested in Stonehenge consulted with the authorities to try to find alternative solutions to the ban.
- EKMR, 11.04.1996 - 24019/94
FINSKA FÖRSAMLINGEN I STOCKHOLM AND HAUTANIEMI v. SWEDEN
It recalls that a church body or an association with religious and philosophical aims is capable of possessing and exercising the right to freedom of religion, since an application by such a body is in reality lodged on behalf of its members (see, e.g., No. 12587/86, Dec. 14.7.87, D.R. 53 pp. 241 et seq., at p. 246, and the further references therein). - EGMR, 29.06.1999 - 32549/96
VEREIN NETZWERK v. AUSTRIA
Again assuming exhaustion of domestic remedies, the Court recalls that an association with religious or philosophical objectives is capable of exercising the rights contained in Article 9 (cf. no. 12587/86, Dec. 14.7.87, D.R. 53, p. 241 with further references).