Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DUBOWSKA AND SKUP v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 14, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 20.09.1994 - 13470/87

  OTTO-PREMINGER-INSTITUT v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 18.04.1997 - 33490/96

  Thus, the respect for the religious feelings of believers as guaranteed in Article 9 (Art. 9) may in some cases be violated by provocative portrayals of objects of religious veneration (see Eur. Court HR, Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria judgment of 20 September 1994, Series A no. 295-A, p. 18, para. 47).
• EKMR, 05.03.1991 - 17439/90

  CHOUDHURY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 18.04.1997 - 33490/96

  1 (Art. 9-1) of the Convention does not necessarily and in all circumstances imply a right to bring any specific form of proceedings against those who, by authorship or publication, offend the sensitivities of an individual or of a group of individuals (see mutatis mutandis No. 17439/90, Dec. 5.3.91, unpublished).
• EKMR, 14.07.1983 - 9777/82

  T. c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 18.04.1997 - 33490/96

  1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention does not guarantee a right to have criminal proceedings instituted against a third person (No. 9777/82, Dec. 14.7.83, D.R. 34 p. 158).

• EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 22604/18

  ASOCIACIÓN DE ABOGADOS CRISTIANOS v. SPAIN

  Moreover, the fact that the authorities eventually found that no offence had been committed does not in itself amount to a failure to protect the applicants' rights guaranteed under Article 9 of the Convention (see Dubowska and Skup v. Poland, nos. 33490/96 and 34055/96, Commission decision of 18 April 1997, Decisions and Reports 89, p. 156).