Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 06.03.1985 - 10243/83 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1985,12682) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TIMES NEWSPAPER LTD., GILES, KNIGHTLEY et POTTER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TIMES NEWSPAPER LTD., GILES, KNIGHTLEY and POTTER v. the UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 2, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (6)
- EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 50421/08
SIDABRAS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA
So did the former Commission (see Times Newspapers Ltd. and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 10243/83, Commission decision of 6 March 1985, Decisions and Reports (DR) 41, p. 123; Ruiz-Mateos and Others v. Spain, no. 24469/94, Commission decision of 2 December 1994, DR 79-B, p. 141; and Oberschlick v. Austria, nos. - EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 28727/11
KUDESHKINA v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
They further considered that this case was not of a kind where the Court is called upon to examine whether measures taken by a respondent State in execution of one of its judgments are compatible with the substantive clauses of the Convention (referring to Akdivar and Others v. Turkey (Article 50), 1 April 1998, § 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II; Mehemi v. France (no. 2), no. 53470/99, § 43, ECHR 2003-IV; Haase and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 34499/04, 7 February 2008; Wasserman v. Russia (no. 2), no. 21071/05, § 31 in fine, 10 April 2008; Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, § 121, 15 January 2009; and Kafkaris v. Cyprus (no. 2) (dec.), no. 9644/09, 21 June 2011; making further reliance on the Commission decisions Times Newspapers Ltd. and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 10243/83, 6 March 1985, DR 41, p. 123; Ruiz-Mateos and Others v. Spain, no. 24469/94, 2 December 1994, DR 79-B, p. 141; and Oberschlick v. Austria, nos. - EKMR, 16.05.1995 - 23727/94
OBERSCHLICK v. AUSTRIA
The Commission cannot assume any function in relation to the supervision of the execution of the Court's judgment, this supervision being entrusted under Article 54 (Art. 54) of the Convention to the Committee of Ministers (see No. 10243/83, Dec. 6.3.85, D.R. 41 p. 123 at 129; No. 19438/92, Dec. 29.3.93, to be published in D.R.).
- EKMR, 11.01.1995 - 23202/94
PHILIS v. GREECE
The supervision of the Court's judgment is entrusted under Article 54 of the Convention to the Committee of Ministers (see No. 10243/83, Dec. 6.3.85, D.R. 41 p. 123 at 129; No. 19438/92, Dec. 29.3.93, to be published in D.R.). - EKMR, 01.12.1994 - 21830/93
X, Y AND Z v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Article 13 (Art. 13) cannot however be interpreted as guaranteeing a remedy against, or judicial review of, domestic law which is not considered to be in conformity with the Convention (mutatis mutandis, Application No. 10243/83, Dec. 6.3.85, D.R. 41 p. 123 and Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, Comm. Rep. 14.12.79, para. 177, Eur.Court H.R., Series B no. 39, p. 49, paras. 174-178). - EKMR, 16.05.1995 - 21655/93 weist darauf hin, dass gemäß Art. 54 EMRK allein das Ministerkomitee zur Überwachung der Durchführung der Urteile zuständig ist (vgl. EKMR, Bsw. 10243/83, Entsch. v. 6.3.85, DR 41, 129; EKMR, Bsw. 19438/92, Entsch. v. 29.3.93).