Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GJINI v. SERBIA

  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GJINI v. SERBIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 1128/16
• EGMR, 04.06.2020 - 1128/16

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (19)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 1128/16

  Article 3 of the Convention enshrines one of the most fundamental values of democratic societies (see, among other authorities, Selmouni [GC], cited above, § 95; Labita v Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV; and Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 81, ECHR 2015).

  Thus, it has used evidence arising from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, 6 April 2000), from primary facts, or contextual facts or sequences of events which can form the basis for inferences about the primary facts, and also from statements by international observers (see Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508/13, § 317, 28 November 2017).

• EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 44973/04

  PREMININY v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 1128/16

  In such circumstances, the absence of any direct State involvement in acts of violence that meet the condition of severity such as to engage Article 3 of the Convention does not absolve the State from its obligations under this provision (see Premininy v. Russia, no. 44973/04, § 71, 10 February 2011).

  Unfortunately, this aspect of the issue is absent from the majority's analysis, in disregard of the Court's case-law on the subject (see Premininy v. Russia, no. 44973/04, § 87, 10 February 2011, and Rodić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 22893/05, §§ 69-71, 27 May 2008).

• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

  M.C. c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 1128/16

  By virtue of the said two provisions, States are required to ensure that individuals within their jurisdiction are not subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, including ill-treatment administered by private individuals (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 149, ECHR 2003-XII, and Premininy, cited above, § 72).

• EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94

  Mord an James Bulger

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 1128/16

  The Court has considered treatment to be degrading where it humiliated or debased an individual, showing a lack of respect for, or diminishing, his or her human dignity, or aroused feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual's moral and physical resistance and debasing them (V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX).
• EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 71156/01

  Mitglieder der Versammlung von Gldani der Zeugen Jehovas u.a. ./. Georgien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 1128/16

  Article 3 of the Convention additionally requires that an official investigation be conducted even in the absence of an express complaint, if there are sufficiently clear indications that ill-treatment might have occurred (see, for example, Members of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and Others v. Georgia, no. 71156/01, § 97, 3 May 2007; and also Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos.
• EGMR, 24.07.2008 - 41461/02

  VLADIMIR ROMANOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 1128/16

  Where allegations are made under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court must apply particularly thorough scrutiny and those allegations must be supported by appropriate evidence (see Matko v. Slovenia, no. 43393/98, § 100, 2 November 2006, and Vladimir Romanov v. Russia, no. 41461/02, § 59, 24 July 2008).
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 1128/16

  33097/96 and 57834/00, § 133, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 26.01.2006 - 77617/01

  MIKHEYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 1128/16

  It would thus be more appropriately examined at the merits stage (see Tahirova v. Azerbaijan, no. 47137/07, § 50, 3 October 2013, and Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, § 88, 26 January 2006).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 1128/16

  33097/96 and 57834/00, § 133, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 02.04.2009 - 22684/05

  MURADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 1128/16

  In previous cases, such an obligation has arisen on the basis of various explicit or implicit indications, such as: facts implied in complaints made by an applicant during criminal proceedings against him (see J.L. v. Latvia, no. 23893/06, §§ 11-13 and 73-75, 17 April 2012); a letter from an applicant to a county court in relation to civil proceedings concerning his involuntary admission to a psychiatric hospital (see M.S. v. Croatia (no. 2), cited above, §§ 82-83); the presentation of evidence of ill-treatment by an applicant in civil proceedings (see Muradova v. Azerbaijan, no. 22684/05, §§ 122-126, 2 April 2009); and an allegation of ill-treatment in an applicant's appeal against a first-instance judgment and in his constitutional complaint (see Mađer v. Croatia, no. 56185/07, §§ 88-89, 21 June 2011).
• EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 56185/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 19796/14

  KRSMANOVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 47137/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Einstufung des in französischer Haft zugefügten Übels als Folter - Verpflichtung …
• RG, 12.02.1910 - V 72/09

  Öffentlicher Glaube des Grundbuchs.
• OLG Hamburg, 22.04.2010 - 12 WF 75/10

  Verfahrenskostenhilfe für ein einstweiliges Anordnungsverfahren zum …
• EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 46248/07

  SHESTOPALOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 29.01.2009 - 22107/03

  ANTROPOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 62798/09

  IVANOV v. RUSSIA and 1 other application

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 27.02.2020 - C-18/19

  Stadt Frankfurt am Main - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Raum der Freiheit, der …

  {FN:66} Unter Anwendung von Art. 3 der Europäischen Konvention zum Schutz der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten (im Folgenden: EMRK), der ein absolutes Verbot von Folter und unmenschlicher oder erniedrigender Strafen oder Behandlungen ausspricht, hat der EGMR klargestellt, dass sich inhaftierte Personen in einer verletzlichen Situation befinden und dass die Behörden die Pflicht haben, sie zu schützen, insbesondere vor gewalttätigem oder unangemessenem Verhalten von Mitgefangenen (EGMR, 15. Januar 2019, Gjini/Serbien, CE:ECHR:2019:0115JUD000112816).