Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HERBAI v. HUNGARY

  Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10 - Positive obligations);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  HERBAI v. HUNGARY

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (9)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.01.2013 - 36769/08

  Verhältnis von Urheberrecht und Pressefreiheit

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2019 - 11608/15

  It follows that, where commercial speech is concerned, the standards of scrutiny may be less severe (see, mutatis mutandis, Demuth v. Switzerland, no. 38743/97, §§ 41-42, ECHR 2002-IX, and markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany, 20 November 1989, § 33, Series A no. 165); and the margin of appreciation afforded to the national authorities is broad (see Ashby Donald and Others v. France, no. 36769/08, § 39, 10 January 2013).
• EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2019 - 11608/15

  It follows that, where commercial speech is concerned, the standards of scrutiny may be less severe (see, mutatis mutandis, Demuth v. Switzerland, no. 38743/97, §§ 41-42, ECHR 2002-IX, and markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany, 20 November 1989, § 33, Series A no. 165); and the margin of appreciation afforded to the national authorities is broad (see Ashby Donald and Others v. France, no. 36769/08, § 39, 10 January 2013).
• EGMR, 12.09.2011 - 28955/06

  Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2019 - 11608/15

  In both contexts regard must be had in particular to the fair balance that has to be struck between the competing interests of the individual and of the community as a whole, subject in any event to the margin of appreciation enjoyed by the State (see Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06 and 3 others, §§ 60 and 62, ECHR 2011).
• EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 38743/97

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2019 - 11608/15

  It follows that, where commercial speech is concerned, the standards of scrutiny may be less severe (see, mutatis mutandis, Demuth v. Switzerland, no. 38743/97, §§ 41-42, ECHR 2002-IX, and markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany, 20 November 1989, § 33, Series A no. 165); and the margin of appreciation afforded to the national authorities is broad (see Ashby Donald and Others v. France, no. 36769/08, § 39, 10 January 2013).
• EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 58688/11

  HARABIN v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2019 - 11608/15

  It however also held that comments which lay within the applicant's sphere of employment in the civil service and which had been made pursuant to his official duties did not involve any statements or views in the context of a public debate and did not relate to freedom of expression (see Harabin v. Slovakia, no. 58688/11, §§ 151-153, 20 November 2012).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• BAG, 05.12.2019 - 2 AZR 240/19

  Verhaltensbedingte Kündigung - Meinungsfreiheit - Schmähkritik

  Mit der Bedeutung des Grundrechts auf Meinungsfreiheit wäre es unvereinbar, wenn es in der betrieblichen Arbeitswelt nicht oder nur eingeschränkt anwendbar wäre (…BAG 31. Juli 2014 - 2 AZR 505/13 - aaO; 24. November 2005 - 2 AZR 584/04 - zu B I 2 b aa der Gründe mwN; zu Art. 10 EMRK vgl. EGMR 5. November 2019 - 11608/15 -).
• EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 35786/19

  MELIKE c. TURQUIE

  La Cour rappelle à cet égard que la protection de l'article 10 de la Convention s'étend à la sphère professionnelle en général (Herbai c. Hongrie, no 11608/15, § 36, 5 novembre 2019, voir aussi Koudechkina c. Russie, no 29492/05, § 85, 26 février 2009 et les références qui y figurent) et que cette disposition s'impose non seulement dans les relations entre employeur et employé lorsque celles-ci obéissent au droit public mais peut également s'appliquer lorsque ces relations relèvent, comme en l'espèce, du droit privé (Fuentes Bobo c. Espagne, no 39293/98, § 38, 29 février 2000).
• EGMR, 02.06.2022 - 59402/14

  STRAUME v. LATVIA

  It should also be distinguished from situations in which employees express their own personal opinions, as actions and statements aimed at furthering the interests of trade union members as a whole call for a particularly high level of protection (compare Herbai v. Hungary, no. 11608/15, § 44, 5 November 2019, with respect to the freedom of expression of an employee, and Vellutini and Michel v. France, no. 32820/09, §§ 37-39, 6 October 2011, with respect to the freedom of expression of trade union representatives).

• EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 10271/12

  KILIN v. RUSSIA

  The relevant question is whether the statements belonged to a type of expression entitled to heightened or reduced protection under Article 10 of the Convention, which is ultimately for the Court to decide, while having regard to the findings of the domestic courts in this regard (see, for instance, Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy, cited above, § 174; Bédat, cited above, § 66; and Herbai v. Hungary, no. 11608/15, §§ 43-44, 5 November 2019).
• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 3642/10

  MUKHIN v. RUSSIA

  The relevant question is whether the statements belonged to a type of expression entitled to heightened or reduced protection under Article 10 of the Convention, which is ultimately for the Court to decide, while having regard to the findings of the domestic courts in this regard (see, for instance, Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy, cited above, § 174; Bédat, cited above, § 66; and Herbai v. Hungary, no. 11608/15, §§ 43-44, 5 November 2019).
• EGMR, 08.10.2024 - 41675/12

  AGHAJANYAN v. ARMENIA

  In certain cases, the State has a positive obligation to protect the right to freedom of expression, even against interference by private individuals (see Halet v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 21884/18, § 111, 14 February 2023; Palomo Sánchez and Others, cited above, § 59; and Herbai v. Hungary, no. 11608/15, § 37, 5 November 2019).
• EGMR, 15.10.2024 - 73585/14

  GADZHIYEV v. RUSSIA

  Même si la bonne foi devant être respectée dans le cadre d'un contrat de travail n'implique pas un devoir de loyauté absolue envers l'employeur ni une obligation de réserve entraînant la sujétion du travailleur aux intérêts de l'employeur, certaines manifestations du droit à la liberté d'expression qui pourraient être légitimes dans d'autres contextes ne le sont pas dans le cadre de la relation de travail (Herbai c. Hongrie, no 11608/15, § 38, 5 novembre 2019, et Palomo Sánchez et autres, précité, § 76).
• EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 41752/09

  GORYAYNOVA v. UKRAINE

  In doing so, it takes into account a number of factors, namely the public interest involved, the factual basis of the statements, their actual wording and possible interpretations, the applicant's motive for the statements, whether he or she had any alternative channels for disclosure, the damage suffered by the State authority, if any, and the severity of the sanction applied to the applicant (see Guja, cited above, §§ 73-78, and, as regards private employers, Heinisch, cited above, §§ 65-70, and Herbai v. Hungary, no. 11608/15, § 40, 5 November 2019).
• EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 48340/20

  DEDE c. TURQUIE

  Rn. 37 La Cour rappelle que la protection de l'article 10 de la Convention s'étend à la sphère professionnelle en général (Melike, précité, § 39, et Herbai c. Hongrie, no 11608/15, § 36, 5 novembre 2019) et que cette disposition s'impose non seulement dans les relations entre employeur et employé lorsque celles-ci obéissent au droit public mais peut également s'appliquer lorsque ces relations relèvent, comme en l'espèce, du droit privé (Heinisch, § 44, précité, et Fuentes Bobo c. Espagne, no 39293/98, § 38, 29 février 2000).