Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KABKOV v. RUSSIA

  (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 12377/03
• EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 12377/03

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 12377/03

  The Court reiterates that the procedural guarantees laid down in Article 6 secure to everyone the right to have any claim relating to his civil rights and obligations brought before a court or tribunal; in this way it embodies the "right to a court", of which the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters, constitutes one aspect (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, pp. 13-18, §§ 28-36).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 12377/03

  Moreover, the outcome of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the civil right in question (see, among others, Stojakovic v. Austria, no. 30003/02, § 38, 9 November 2006, and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 27, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92

  HOKKANEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 12377/03

  The Court further notes that the Convention entered into force in respect of the Russian Federation on 5 May 1998 and it will limit its examination of the present application to the question as to whether the events occurring after that date disclosed a breach of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Hokkanen v. Finland, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, p. 19, § 52).

• EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90

  YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 12377/03

  However, it must take into account the state of the proceedings by this critical date (see YaÄŸcı and Sargın v. Turkey, judgment of 8 June 1995, Series A no. 319-A, p. 20, § 58).
• EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 4856/03

  DUBINSKAYA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 12377/03

  In this connection the Court observes that after the applicant's employment dispute had been remitted for a fresh examination at first instance and the file had been lost, there was no judicial decision which would determine the merits of the dispute or discontinue the proceedings regarding it (see Dubinskaya v. Russia, no. 4856/03, § 30, 13 July 2006).
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 30003/02

  STOJAKOVIC v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 12377/03

  Moreover, the outcome of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the civil right in question (see, among others, Stojakovic v. Austria, no. 30003/02, § 38, 9 November 2006, and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 27, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 3354/02

  GORBACHEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 12377/03

  Having regard to the submissions of the parties, the Court considers that the application foremost raises an issue as to the applicant's right of access to a court (see Gorbachev v. Russia, no. 3354/02, § 40, 15 February 2007) which it will examine first.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen