Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NARBUTAS v. LITHUANIA

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  NARBUTAS v. LITHUANIA

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (14)Zitiert selbst (45)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.12.2023 - 14139/21

  40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 95-107, ECHR 2012, and Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France [GC], no. 40454/07, §§ 90-93, ECHR 2015 (extracts)), are applicable in the present case.
• EGMR, 28.06.2018 - 60798/10

  Namen der Sedlmayr-Mörder bleiben im Netz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.12.2023 - 14139/21

  It emphasises that the risk of harm posed by content and communications on the Internet to the exercise and enjoyment of human rights and freedoms, particularly the right to respect for private life, is certainly higher than that posed by the press, particularly on account of the important role of search engines (see M.L. and W.W. v. Germany, nos. 60798/10 and 65599/10, § 91, 28 June 2018, and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.12.2023 - 14139/21

  Rn. 291 The general principles for assessing the necessity of an interference with the exercise of freedom of expression, which have been frequently reaffirmed by the Court since the judgment in Handyside v. the United Kingdom (7 December 1976, Series A no. 24), have been summarised in, among other authorities, Stoll v. Switzerland ([GC], no. 69698/01, § 101, ECHR 2007-V), Morice (cited above, § 124) and Bédat (cited above, § 48).

• EGMR, 04.12.2015 - 47143/06

  EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen geheimer Telefonüberwachung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.12.2023 - 14139/21

  Rn. 326 In this connection, the Court reiterates that, according to its well-established case-law, its task is not normally to review the relevant law and practice in abstracto, but to determine whether the manner in which they were applied to, or affected, the applicant gave rise to a violation of the Convention (see Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, § 164, ECHR 2015, and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 28.10.1999 - 28396/95

  Nichtberufung eines liechtensteiner Richters in das Amt des Gerichtspräsidenten …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.12.2023 - 14139/21

  To answer this question, the scope of the measure must be determined by putting it in the context of the facts of the case and of the relevant legislation (see Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 43, ECHR 1999-VII).
• EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 51405/12

  Deutsche Medien scheitern

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.12.2023 - 14139/21

  Indeed, the applicant did not voluntarily expose himself to the public but was forced to attend the hearing, and, under these circumstances, he had no means to protect his privacy and to prevent journalists from obtaining the images of him being led by police officers in a position which made it seem as if he was handcuffed (see, mutatis mutandis, Axel Springer SE and RTL Television GmbH v. Germany, no. 51405/12, § 52, 21 September 2017).
• EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 32772/02

  Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VGT) ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.12.2023 - 14139/21

  In such circumstances, the Court considers that the domestic authorities were given an opportunity to address his complaint subsequently raised before the Court and that this complaint cannot be dismissed for failure to exhaust domestic remedies (see, mutatis mutandis, Vladimir Romanov v. Russia, no. 41461/02, § 52, 24 July 2008, and Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, §§ 43-45, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 23.01.2023 - 61435/19

  Verstoß gegen Meinungsfreiheit: Geschichten über gleichgeschlechtliche …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.12.2023 - 14139/21

  He did not submit that the amount claimed in respect of costs and expenses had not been covered by the funds raised or that he had undertaken to return those donations (see, mutatis mutandis, Macatė v. Lithuania [GC], no. 61435/19, § 229, 23 January 2023).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.12.2023 - 14139/21

  Rn. 219 The Court, being the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, §§ 114 and 126, 20 March 2018) considers that this complaint falls to be examined solely under Article 8 of the Convention, which reads as follows:.
• EGMR, 05.05.2020 - 3594/19

  KÖVESI v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.12.2023 - 14139/21

  Rn. 248 The Court has recognised in its case-law that the protection of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention extends to civil servants and members of the judiciary (see Kövesi v. Romania, no. 3594/19, § 179, 5 May 2020, and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 24.07.2008 - 41461/02

  VLADIMIR ROMANOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 26.03.2002 - 48297/99

  BUTKEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 23.07.2009 - 12268/03
• EGMR, 16.04.2009 - 34438/04
• EGMR, 26.04.2022 - 37713/18

  MEDIENGRUPPE ÖSTERREICH GMBH v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 21392/08

  KARAHASANOGLU v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 03.09.2019 - 69717/14

  JANUSKEVICIENÄ- v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 10.09.2013 - 663/11

  NEDYALKOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 26238/10

  BRISC v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 20.06.2023 - 36705/16

  MARGARI v. GREECE
• EGMR, 11.06.2020 - 17483/10

  MARKUS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 03.11.2022 - 9487/19

  MAMALADZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 57435/09

  PAULIKAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 31634/18

  RIMSÄ'VICS v. LATVIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 05.05.2022 - 19362/18

  MESIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 32644/09

  APOSTOLOVI v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 30.10.2018 - 1759/08

  KABOGLU ET ORAN c. TURQUIE et 2 autres affaires
• EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 14888/03

  GODLEVSKIY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.11.2019 - 68995/13

  SCHWEIZERISCHE RADIO- UND FERNSEHGESELLSCHAFT ET AUTRES c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 24.06.2021 - 77668/14

  IMERI v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 05.04.2022 - 54491/14

  CALIN v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 15.09.2020 - 21218/12

  CIVINSKAITÄ- v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 03.03.2022 - 51853/19

  SHORAZOVA v. MALTA
• EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 18925/09

  JISHKARIANI v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 02.02.2023 - 30352/11

  GARAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 02.03.2023 - 70572/16

  DZERKHORASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 05.07.2022 - 42315/15

  DROUSIOTIS v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 07.07.2020 - 11398/18

  GALAKVO? CIUS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 20.12.2016 - 14737/08

  USPASKICH v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 28.02.2023 - 911/16

  CAPA?¢ÎNA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 15.11.2022 - 24919/20

  MARCINKEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 59076/08

  A.C. v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 48183/99
• EGMR, 08.08.2006 - 23042/02

  CABALA v. POLAND

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 23.06.2026 - 25916/18

  MARINAKIS c. GRÈCE

  La Cour a déjà admis dans des circonstances similaires qu'un recours civil pouvait en principe fournir un redressement adéquat et suffisant au requérant (à rapprocher avec Okropiridze c. Géorgie, nos 43627/16 et 71667/16, § 114, 7 septembre 2023, Narbutas c. Lituanie, no 14139/21, §§ 213-214, 19 décembre 2023, et à contraster avec Konstas, précité, §§ 29 et 40, dans lequel le requérant a soulevé le grief tiré d'une violation de son droit à la présomption d'innocence en tant que garantie du procès équitable à raison des déclarations des hauts fonctionnaires de l'État faites au moment de l'appel de sa condamnation).

  Rn. 4 L'approche adoptée dans l'arrêt Konstas, en ce qui concerne l'épuisement des voies de recours, n'est plus étayée par notre jurisprudence actuelle: une jurisprudence plus récente a précisé que les recours civils peuvent en principe être effectifs relativement à des déclarations préjudiciables faites par des autorités non judiciaires en dehors d'une procédure pénale formelle (Okropiridze c. Géorgie, nos 43627/16 et 71667/16, § 113, 7 septembre 2023 ; Narbutas c. Lituanie, no 14139/21, § 214, 19 décembre 2023 ; Januškevičienė c. Lituanie, no 69717/14, § 59, 3 septembre 2019).

• EGMR, 03.04.2025 - 52302/19

  FEDERICI c. FRANCE

  La Cour rappelle qu'elle n'a pas pour tâche d'examiner dans l'abstrait la législation et la pratique pertinentes, mais de rechercher si la manière dont elles ont été appliquées au requérant ou l'ont touché a donné lieu à une violation de la Convention (voir, par exemple, Narbutas c. Lituanie, no 14139/21, § 326, 19 décembre 2023, et la jurisprudence y citée).
• EGMR, 02.07.2026 - 22126/15

  BASTOVOI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Moreover, the Court has found on numerous occasions that a civil-law remedy could be an effective way of addressing a complaint about allegedly prejudicial statements made in respect of ongoing criminal proceedings, either alone or in combination with raising the issue within the criminal proceedings against the applicant in that case (see Rytikov v. Ukraine, no. 52855/19, §§ 42-46, 23 May 2024; Kezerashvili v. Georgia, no. 11027/22, §§ 67-68, 5 December 2024; and Narbutas v. Lithuania, no. 14139/21, §§ 210-17, 19 December 2023).

• EGMR, 27.11.2025 - 43050/22

  VUJOVIC AND LIPA DOO v. MONTENEGRO

  It has no reason to doubt that the applicants sustained non-pecuniary damage on account of those violations (see, mutatis mutandis, Narbutas v. Lithuania, no. 14139/21, § 343, 19 December 2023).
• EGMR, 09.10.2025 - 1986/09

  PETRUZZO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Rn. 60 La Cour rappelle que, si une personne a plusieurs recours internes à sa disposition, elle est en droit, aux fins de l'épuisement des voies de recours internes, d'en choisir un susceptible d'aboutir au redressement de son grief principal (Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase c. Roumanie [GC], no 41720/13, § 177, 25 juin 2019 ; voir aussi, récemment, Narbutas c. Lituanie, no 14139/21, § 164, 19 décembre 2023).
• EGMR, 13.01.2026 - 54353/20

  VOVK v. UKRAINE

  43627/16 and 71667/16, §§ 111-15, 7 September 2023; and Narbutas v. Lithuania, no. 14139/21, §§ 210-17, 19 December 2023).
• EGMR, 08.04.2025 - 22077/19

  GREEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  While the Court is not prevented from examining this question of its own motion (see Béláné Nagy v. Hungary [GC], no. 53080/13, § 71, 13 December 2016, and Vegotex International S.A. v. Belgium [GC], no. 49812/09, § 59, 3 November 2022), it sees no reason to doubt that the disclosure of the applicant's name in the House of Lords, linking him to allegations of "serious and repeated sexual harassment, racist abuse and bullying" (see paragraph 14 above) in defiance of an interim injunction and anonymity order granted by the Court of Appeal, attained a sufficient level of seriousness as to harm his reputation (see, for example, Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 83, 7 February 2012; see also Narbutas v. Lithuania, no. 14139/21, § 224, 19 December 2023).
• EGMR, 09.10.2025 - 74009/16

  GAHRAMANLI v. AZERBAIJAN

  Rn. 14 The Court notes the absence of information about the domestic legal instruments or examples of well-established case-law which could lead it to believe that the domestic courts called upon to decide on the applicant's pre-trial detention were also entitled to assess the public statement in question (compare, among other authorities, Narbutas v. Lithuania, no. 14139/21, §§ 211 and 213, 19 December 2023).
• EGMR, 11.02.2025 - 34582/16

  BAGIROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Rn. 22 The Court notes the absence of information about the domestic legal instruments or examples of well-established case-law which could lead it to believe that the domestic courts called upon to decide on his pre-trial detention were also entitled to assess the joint public statement in question (compare, among other authorities, Narbutas v. Lithuania, no. 14139/21, §§ 211 and 213, 19 December 2023).
• EGMR, 20.06.2024 - 38129/15

  TEMPORALE c. ITALIE

  En d'autres termes, lorsqu'une voie de recours a été utilisée, l'usage d'une autre voie dont le but est pratiquement le même n'est pas exigé (Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase c. Roumanie [GC], no 41720/13, § 177, 25 juin 2019 ; voir aussi, récemment, Narbutas c. Lithuanie, no 14139/21, § 164, 19 décembre 2023).
• EGMR, 05.02.2026 - 17242/22

  FORAI v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR - 5988/24 (anhängig)

  JUCIUS v. LITHUANIA and 1 other application
• EGMR - 15526/24 (anhängig)

  LOPEZ LOPEZ v. SPAIN
• EGMR, 29.01.2026 - 40478/22

  IVANOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA