Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NAGIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NAGIYEV c. AZERBAÏDJAN

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et à la sûreté (Article 5-1 - Arrestation ou détention régulière) (französisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  NAGIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (19)Zitiert selbst (4)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.04.2015 - 16499/09

  What is at stake here is not only the "right to liberty" but also the "right to security of person" (see, among other authorities, Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111, and Wassink v. the Netherlands, 27 September 1990, § 24, Series A no. 185-A).
• EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

  ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.04.2015 - 16499/09

  The absence of a record of such matters as the date, time and location of detention, the name of the detainee, the reasons for the detention, and the name of the person effecting it, must be seen as incompatible with the requirement of lawfulness and with the very purpose of Article 5 of the Convention (see Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, § 125, Reports 1998-III, and Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 154, ECHR 2002-IV).
• EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 37138/06

  FARHAD ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.04.2015 - 16499/09

  The relevant provisions of the CCrP concerning pre-trial detention, the application of the preventive measure of remand in custody, and the extension of detention periods pending criminal proceedings, are described in detail in the Court's judgments in Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 37138/06, §§ 83-102, 9 November 2010), and Muradverdiyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 16966/06, §§ 35-49, 9 December 2010).
• EGMR, 09.12.2010 - 16966/06

  MURADVERDIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.04.2015 - 16499/09

  The relevant provisions of the CCrP concerning pre-trial detention, the application of the preventive measure of remand in custody, and the extension of detention periods pending criminal proceedings, are described in detail in the Court's judgments in Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 37138/06, §§ 83-102, 9 November 2010), and Muradverdiyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 16966/06, §§ 35-49, 9 December 2010).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 7077/06

  FORTALNOV v. RUSSIA

  The absence of a record of such matters as the date, time and location of detention, the name of the detainee, the reasons for his detention and the name of the person effecting it must be seen as incompatible with the requirement of lawfulness and with the very purpose of Article 5 of the Convention (see, inter alia, Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 87, ECHR 2006-III; Aleksandr Sokolov v. Russia, no. 20364/05, 4 November 2010, §§ 70-73; Ivan Kuzmin, cited above, §§ 81-84; Smolik v. Ukraine, no. 11778/05, §§ 46-48, 19 January 2012; Grinenko v. Ukraine, no. 33627/06, §§ 75-78, 15 November 2012; Venskutė v. Lithuania, no. 10645/08, § 80, 11 December 2012; Rakhimberdiyev v. Russia, no. 47837/06, §§ 35-36, 18 September 2014; Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, §§ 57 and 64, 23 April 2015; and Birulev and Shishkin v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 09.10.2025 - 31581/16

  JABBAROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Rn. 9 In the leading cases of Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, 23 April 2015; Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, 7 May 2015; and Mammadov and Abbasov v. Azerbaijan, no. 1172/12, 8 July 2021, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

  Unlawful deprivation of liberty as a result of unrecorded and/or unacknowledged detention (see Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, §§ 54-68, 23 April 2015; Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, §§ 81-88, 7 May 2015; and Mammadov and Abbasov v. Azerbaijan, no. 1172/12, §§ 42-54, 8 July 2021).

• EGMR, 30.04.2025 - 9747/14

  MURADVERDIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Rn. 9 In the leading cases of Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, 23 April 2015; Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, 7 May 2015; and Mammadov and Abbasov v. Azerbaijan, no. 1172/12, 8 July 2021, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present cases.

  Unlawful deprivation of liberty as a result of unrecorded and/or unacknowledged detention (see Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, §§ 54-68, 23 April 2015; Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59135/09, §§ 81-88, 7 May 2015; and Mammadov and Abbasov v. Azerbaijan, no. 1172/12, §§ 42-54, 8 July 2021).

• EGMR, 11.06.2026 - 24427/15

  VARVA v. UKRAINE

  Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, § 57, 23 April 2015,.
• EGMR, 05.09.2024 - 39503/17

  MUKHTARLI v. AZERBAIJAN AND GEORGIA

  Rn. 194 The Court refers to the general principles established in its case-law set out in the judgment Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 16499/09, §§ 54-57, 23 April 2015), which are equally pertinent to the present case.
• EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 35432/07

  MAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  The Court refers to the general principles established in its case-law set out in the judgment Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 16499/09, §§ 54-57, 23 April 2015), which are equally pertinent to the present case.
• EGMR, 20.02.2020 - 58717/10

  NASIROV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  The absence of a record of such matters as the date, time and location of detention, the name of the detainee, the reasons for the detention and the name of the person effecting it must be seen as incompatible with the requirement of lawfulness and with the very purpose of Article 5 of the Convention (see Aleksandr Sokolov v. Russia, no. 20364/05, §§ 71-72, 4 November 2010; and Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, § 57, 23 April 2015; see also Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, § 125, Reports 1998-III; and Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 157, ECHR 2002-IV).
• EGMR, 19.03.2020 - 22004/11

  SATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  The Court reiterates in this connection that the unrecorded detention of an individual constitutes a complete negation of the fundamentally important guarantees contained in Article 5 of the Convention, and discloses a grave violation of that provision (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 154, ECHR 2002-IV; Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, § 64, 23 April 2015; and Mammadov and Others, cited above, § 89).
• EGMR, 28.04.2016 - 42906/12

  CAMANS AND OTHERS v. LATVIA

  The absence of a record of such matters as the date, time and location of detention, the name of the detainee, the reasons for the detention and the name of the person effecting it must be seen as incompatible with the requirement of lawfulness and with the very purpose of Article 5 of the Convention (see, for example, Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, §§ 57 and 64, 23 April 2015; Rakhimberdiyev v. Russia, no. 47837/06, § 35, 18 September 2014; and Venskutė v. Lithuania, no. 10645/08, § 80, 11 December 2012).
• EGMR, 08.07.2021 - 1172/12

  MAMMADOV AND ABBASOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application

  The Court reiterates in this connection that the unrecorded detention of an individual is a complete negation of the fundamentally important guarantees contained in Article 5 of the Convention, and discloses a grave violation of that provision (see Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 154, ECHR 2002-IV; Nagiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16499/09, § 64, 23 April 2015; and Mammadov and Others, cited above, § 89).
• EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 41168/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 18322/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 08.07.2025 - 81028/17

  RAFIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 09.09.2021 - 30133/12

  HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR - 24420/20 (anhängig)

  SULEYMANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 20.01.2026 - 37457/09

  GASIMOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 4 other applications
• EGMR, 09.10.2025 - 31340/13

  MUKHTARLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 19.10.2017 - 60873/09

  VANCHEV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR - 47984/19 (anhängig)

  BAGIROV v. AZERBAIJAN